Advanced BioFuels USA

Ethanol Producers to Electric Car Makers: We’re Greener than You Are

by Chuck Abbott (Successful Farming) With automakers shifting toward the production of electric cars and trucks, the ethanol industry said on Wednesday that biofuels will be an important tool against global warming, and arguably create less pollution than battery-powered vehicles. The comparison was based on life-cycle costs for the power sources, starting at power stations for electricity and cornfields for ethanol.

“The upstream emissions associated with electricity generation and battery manufacturing are often overlooked, giving the false impression that electric vehicles are zero-emission vehicles,” said Geoff Cooper of the Renewable Fuels Association, a trade group. “These overlooked emissions can be quite significant.”

An RFA analysis showed that a pickup truck using fuel that is 85% ethanol and 15% gasoline would generate far fewer greenhouse gas emissions over its lifetime than the same-size pickup truck “running on fossil-generated electricity,” said Cooper at a House Agriculture Committee hearing on the implications of electric vehicles on rural America.

…

At the hearing, Rep. Abigail Spanberger announced a bipartisan bill to modify the USDA’s cost-sharing Rural Energy for America Program to include the installation of charging stations for electric vehicles, including pickup trucks, combines, and farm tractors. “We need to prevent rural America from getting left behind in the conversation,” the Virginia Democrat said in a statement. “Electric vehicles of the future are not just for cities — they also stand to deliver major benefits to farms, agribusinesses, and rural communities in Virginia and across the country.”

…

Electric vehicles figure prominently in the plan as a way to reduce tailpipe emissions. “The future of ground transportation is electrification,” said David Strickland of General Motors, which unveiled an electric pickup truck last week.

“We believe any future decarbonization policy should take a technology-neutral, performance-based approach that focuses strictly on greenhouse emission reduction and increasing fuel efficiency without dictating the use of specific fuels and vehicles to achieve those reductions,” said the RFA’s Cooper. At the current adoption rate of electric vehicles, he said, ethanol will be a clean-burning option for motor vehicles for years to come.

…

Also at the hearing, a representative of the National Association of Convenience Stores said charging stations will not become common unless the stores can sell electricity at competitive rates. At present, they must pay “very high demand charges” to utilities for the electricity, the group said.

To watch a video of the hearing, click here.

To read the written testimony of witnesses, click here. READ MORE

Beyond Cities: Breaking Through Barriers to Rural Electric Vehicle Adoption (Environmental and Energy Study Institute)

Electric vehicles pose hurdles in rural America (Farm Progress)

House Agriculture Committee holds a hearing on Electric Vehicles (RFD TV; includes VIDEO)

Sheetz VP Testifies on EVs at House Ag Committee Hearing — Walter, on behalf of NACS, shared how fuel retailers can help bring EV charging to rural America (NACS)

HOUSE AG TALKS EV IN RURAL AREAS: (Politico’s Morning Energy)

Excerpt from Farm Progress: Mark Mills, senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, says electric vehicles will reduce oil only slightly, and have an even smaller impact on carbon dioxide emissions. Mills also states that the increased demand for EV batteries will lead to increases in the price for batteries, rather than decrease prices over time. Raw materials and minerals consist of 60-70% of the cost to fabricate a battery, and new mines take a minimum of 16 years to bring online.

…

Trevor Walter, vice president of petroleum supply management for Sheetz on behalf of the National Association of Convenience Stores, also warned if a ban is made on internal combustion engines, the ban sets renewable fuels on a path to elimination. “Those farmers have made long-term policy decisions to gear for production.” To pull the rug out from under them now would be detrimental, he said.

This is why it is important for lawmakers to focus on reducing carbon emissions with technology-neutral goals that account for the lifecycle of carbon emissions – including electrician generation – as the foundation for sound policies, he added.

Walter noted fuel retailers are well-positioned to play an important role in decarbonizing vehicles by offering chargers at their sites. “When drivers are able to readily get electricity the same way as they fuel now, the availability of chargers is no longer an impediment.” He added that 86% of rural America is 10 minutes from a convenience store. READ MORE

Excerpt from RFD TV: Several lawmakers expressed concerns about the additional power draw on rural electric grids. Lincoln Wood, the Electrification Policy Manager for the Georgia Southern Company says they are planning to invest $1.3 billion to improve resiliency and cyber security.

“Utilities are constantly looking at the electric grid to upgrade or make more resilient for all these reasons, but a couple specific activities that we’re working on. Might be automated line devices. And so we can isolate the source of that and make a smaller impact to the grid itself. It could be maintenance at a substation or rebuilding the entire substation if needed to increase reliability. It could be even for our transmission system, rebuilding even the structures if those who needed.” READ MORE

Excerpt from NACS: Walter also shared several barriers to developing a competitive market that exist today that make it difficult for fuel retailers to offer EV charging to their customers.

“For our industry to play this important role, and for charging to be good for consumers, the sale of electricity must be reformed such that a functioning competitive retail market for selling electricity to vehicle drivers emerges,” Walter said. “We have several impediments to that today. First, utilities hit commercial users of electricity, such as convenience and fuel retailers, with punitive demand charges. Given the large electricity demands associated with fast chargers, these demand charges overwhelm the cost of electricity and make it impossible for retailers to sell electricity and make a profit.

“Second, many utilities have had the rates they charge adjusted so that residential and business customers pay higher rates in order to underwrite the construction and operation of EV chargers. This too creates an unlevel playing field and prevents a competitive market from emerging because other businesses that deploy chargers must try to recover construction and operating costs from vehicle drivers themselves,” he said.

“Third, a handful of states still prohibit businesses from selling electricity to vehicle drivers—they only allow regulated utilities to do that. This makes businesses with chargers engage in awkward practices such as renting the chargers based on time spent at the charger rather than selling electricity. This makes for confusing experiences and stunts the growth of the market,” Walter said.

Several members of Congress in their statements and questions recognized the important role the convenience industry plays in their communities and echoed many points in Walter’s testimony. Rep. David Scott (D-GA), chairman of the House Agriculture Committee, in his opening statement stated, “As anyone who lives in a rural community knows, gas stations and convenience stores are often a pillar of these communities and are sometimes the only place for us to get food. With the ongoing investment and transition to electric vehicles, we must know what the long-term impact to these businesses will be.”

Rep. Glenn “GT” Thompson (R-PA), ranking member of the House Agriculture Committee, referenced Walter’s testimony when he said that any alternatives, including electricity, should be offered in an open, competitive market and that Congress should not pick winners or losers for transportation energy. When Rep. Thompson asked Walter why it was important that any new motor vehicle fuel and energy technology is subject to an open and competitive market, Walter responded that an open market provides the lowest cost and more choice to consumers.

Several other members of the House Agriculture Committee shared the same concerns highlighted by Walter, including Rep. Randy Feenstra’s (R-IA) comments on creating an even playing field for EV charging, Rep. Sanford Bishop’s (D-GA) question on range anxiety, Rep. Julia Letlow’s (R-LA) concerns on who pays for EV charging and how can businesses make a profit, and finally Rep. Ann Kuster’s (D-NH) concerns and questions regarding creating a rate for electricity for EV charging to eliminate demand charges and excess fees on electricity. READ MORE

Excerpt from Politico’s Morning Energy: HOUSE AG TALKS EV IN RURAL AREAS: Members of the House Agriculture Committee discussed the feasibility of electric vehicle expansion specifically in rural areas during a hearing Wednesday. Lawmakers in both parties raised questions over availability, cost and practical use in remote areas with limited electric resources. Rep. Doug LaMalfa (R-Calif.) expressed concerns over time periods when power is reduced in states like California to avoid wildfires and extreme heat.

“Electric vehicles won’t all charge at the same time,” responded Lincoln Wood, electrification policy manager at Southern Company, adding that there are similar issues with limited gas as folks look to evacuate areas in the South due to incoming hurricanes.

New legislation: Rep. Abigail Spanberger (D-Va.) introduced a bill Wednesday afternoon following the hearing to expand USDA’s Rural Energy for America Program to include electric vehicle supply equipment. Currently REAP can’t be used for electric vehicle charging infrastructure. READ MORE

Exclusive-Biden Weighing Cuts to 2022 Ethanol Blending Mandate Proposal- Sources

by Jarrett Renshaw and Stephanie Kelly (Reuters) The Biden administration is considering lowering the 2022 ethanol blending mandate below the proposed 15 billion gallons amid backlash from the oil refining lobby and unions arguing the shrinking U.S. ethanol industry can no longer support the target, according to two sources familiar with the administration’s thinking.

…

The COVID-19 pandemic has dampened fuel consumption and triggered a handful of ethanol plant shutdowns. Higher regulatory costs have refiners threatening to close refineries and shed high-paying union jobs.

In December, the Environmental Protection Agency issued a long-awaited biofuel blending mandate proposal that cut ethanol requirements for 2020 and 2021 but restored them to 15 billion gallons for 2022. Farmers and biofuel producers criticized the rollbacks but welcomed the restoration this year.

But, in recent weeks, administration officials have considered rolling back the 15 billion gallon mandate when the final rule is issued later this year, the two sources told Reuters.

…

Merchant refiners like PBF Energy (PBF.N) and Monroe Energy have long complained that the cost of purchasing RINs threatens their plants.

While cuts to the 2020 and 2021 ethanol mandate briefly lowered RIN costs, they have since rebounded.

…

Merchant refiners like PBF Energy (PBF.N) and Monroe Energy have long complained that the cost of purchasing RINs threatens their plants.

While cuts to the 2020 and 2021 ethanol mandate briefly lowered RIN costs, they have since rebounded. READ MORE

Report: Biden Considers More RFS Cuts: Biden Administration Weighs Potential 2022 RFS Cuts to Corn Ethanol (DTN Progressive Farmer)

NEW YEAR, NEW RFS PUSHBACK: (Politico’s Morning Energy)

Excerpt from DTN Progressive Farmer: “We have plenty of experience with rumors being reported in the news, sometimes not quite accurately,” Cooper (Renewable Fuels Association CEO, Geoff Cooper) said, “but we would be greatly concerned if EPA is backtracking on its very recent proposal to make sure that we return to that 15-billion-gallon statutory requirement for conventional fuels renewable fuels in 2022.

“We’re going to try and get to the bottom of those rumors and will be absolutely insisting that EPA and this administration follow through on their commitment to restore that 15-billion-gallon commitment for 2022 and beyond.”

Growth Energy CEO Emily Skor said in a statement to DTN she believes the administration will stick to its recent proposal.

“Rumors like these — if true — would only run counter to making meaningful progress on lowering carbon emissions and investing in important clean energy jobs across rural America,” she said.

“The administration has indicated blending requirements will remain strong and at 15 billion gallons for 2022, and we have every expectation that they will deliver on that promise.”

If the report is true, it would coincide with what petroleum industry representatives were asking from the EPA in a Jan. 4 public hearing on the agency’s latest proposals.

In addition, agriculture and biofuels industry representatives called for the agency to pull the proposal to retroactively cut RFS volumes for 2020. READ MORE

Excerpt from Politico’s Morning Energy: NEW YEAR, NEW RFS PUSHBACK: The ethanol industry was on the defensive Wednesday after Reuters reported the Biden administration is considering lowering the 2022 ethanol blending mandate below the proposed 15 billion gallons as part of its final rule. ME readers will recall the administration proposed retroactively reducing 2020 biofuel blending requirements and setting the 2021 volume near the actual demand level, but called for ramping the levels up for 2022 in what was seen as an attempt by the administration to walk the fine line between farming and refining interests.

But Reuters reported Wednesday that the administration is seeing strong backlash from the refining lobby and unions over the 2022 proposal, which argue that the U.S. ethanol industry can’t support the target. Unions and refiner groups repeatedly pushed back against the proposed 2022 levels during a virtual public hearing last week, arguing the proposal was too high and would negate the benefits of the 2020 and 2021 proposals.

Asked about the report during Wednesday’s House Agriculture hearing on EVs, Renewable Fuels Association President and CEO Geoff Cooper said the group “would be greatly concerned” if EPA is backtracking on the 2022 proposal. “We’re going to try and get to the bottom of those rumors and will be absolutely insisting that EPA and this administration follow through on their commitment to restore that 15-billion-gallon commitment for 2022 and beyond,” he said.

Grain of salt: Asked about the report, one person in the refining industry told Kelsey there’s “some nervousness” given the extensive union pushback, as well as concerns over gas prices and jobs, but the person cautioned there haven’t been any definitive signals one way or another on whether the administration will act.

In the meantime, union leaders continue to press their case. There was a call earlier this week during which several union leaders from the Philadelphia area voiced their concerns about the proposal to EPA and White House officials, a person with knowledge of the call told Kelsey. EPA later confirmed there were two calls — one with national unions and a second call with unions and companies — but the agency did not provide any readouts or confirm any details.

“EPA remains committed to the growth of biofuels in America,” EPA spokesperson Nick Conger said. “We look forward to reviewing the robust comments that we receive from all stakeholders before finalizing our rulemaking later this year.” Comments on the proposal are due Feb. 4. READ MORE

QUOTE OF THE WEEK — Neville Fernandes

“With this climate crisis we’re in, we need to reduce the carbon intensity of diesel as much as possible, as quickly as possible, by replacing petroleum with biofuels including biodiesel, renewable diesel and blends of these two low-carbon, clean-burning renewable fuels.” – Neville Fernandes, REG quote in S&P Global Platts article READ MORE

Online Course: Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) — starts February 14, 2022

Master the technology pathways, its business drivers, economics and deployment strategies — This course is intended for those in business,