(National Algae Association) 2016 Algae Year in Review – Nothing has Changed -- 2016 (U.S. Department of Energy) Funding Opportunities: ...
• Global Algae Innovations (San Diego, California)— ...
• Algenol Biotech LLC (Ft. Myers, Florida)-- ...
• MicroBio Engineering, Inc. (San Luis Obispo, California)—
...
None of the projects mentioned above are in commercial production. How many more requests for information from the DOE for more ‘innovative technologies’, and how much more money will go to universities and government labs to get this job done? For how long will the US taxpayer continue to pay salaries and fund projects if the DoE doesn’t know what to do with the results? Algae fuels were proven for automobiles and commercial airlines years ago. We witnessed a test flight during which the pilots did not want to land the plane because of the excellent flight they were having claiming better lubricity and better mileage. Industrial standards were written by university researchers and were promoted by lobbyists. So…how many more technologies do we need to line the shelves at the Department of Energy? Where are the promised algae fuels?
Opinions from commercially-minded algae researchers, algae producers and equipment companies around the world are that these are nothing more than false hopes for the commercial deployment of algae fuels, coupled with opportunities to continue to provide funding to universities and to give the government labs a reason to exist, and a reason to continue to pay salaries to people who have proven their inability to take this project to fruition. Some former DOE algae program employees tried to change the direction of the DOE algae research program; out of frustration and not wanting to be a part of what some call a fraud have left the world of bureaucratic mismanagement. Opinions from researchers around the world is that the current DOE algae research program is little more than an excuse to continue to provide federal funds to universities and to support government laboratories, and that its leadership, a group of researches that the lobbyists and the favored few love, needs to be replaced, starting at the top. At least one individual started working on this as an intern and she has worked her way to the top, never being held accountable for the failures of the program.
The consensus is that the US DOE Algae program/BETO, because of its leadership, is incapable of commercialization and deployment, but have kept their jobs by touting the latest and greatest algae technology and need for additional research rather than admit their failures and misplaced grant awards. Algae fuels have been researched to death for decades with no commercial deployment of fuels to date. Recommendations have been made over the years to take proven parts of algae fuel technologies derived from past algae pilot and demonstration facilities and use them in the commercial production deployment of algae fuels. Private industry has been asking the DOE for over a decade to test the technologies paid for by the taxpayers that will work in commercial production of algae fuels with no success. To our knowledge, none have successfully scaled outside of laboratory settings. While the FOAs imply that commercialization is on the horizon, this has not been a priority of the DOE algae research program. Even past secretaries of energy ignored the facts that algae fuels were successfully tested in automobiles and commercial airlines, choosing to spend money on other feedstocks, and now a lot of the corn grown in the US is not fit for human or animal consumption. This endeavor should not require lobbyists, just common sense – something that has been lacking for years.
We have all reviewed the pristine algae fuel powerpoint presentations and projected high cost of algae fuel for decades including the 2010 Roadmap that has yet to be followed to the presentations describing projects that were 100% funded but, in some cases, less than 50% completed. University algae researchers have maintained for decades that algae fuels were too expensive and could not be achieved, all the while being given additional federal funds to bolster their claim that we need more research. None of which have ever been in commercial deployment of algae fuels. Private industry, private investment and the general public have never had any opportunities to witness past US taxpayer paid-for algae fuel pilot projects to be able to confirm the production let alone any of the purported costs.
Hopefully, the new Secretary of Energy and new President, a proven businessman, will take a no-nonsense business approach and redeploy the funds to allow private industry to take over the task that the government employees have failed to complete. Algae producers (not government research programs) have the ability, skills and experience to lower the projected CAPEX for fuels and to develop their own industrial standards.
We have learned over the last decade that there is a huge learning curve and perspective between university researchers working in labs and commercially-minded algae researchers working with private industry, and it is amazing that the DOE has yet to figure out that what works in a lab rarely scales to a commercial basis – it just keeps throwing money into the labs, allowing them to purchase millions of dollars of equipment from other grant recipients that they later discard.
Mindsets at the DOE Algae Program/BETO must change if the US really wants to see algae fuels as one solution to get off foreign oil. Instead of hijacking algae technologies at government labs we need to take the proven parts of algae fuel technologies which have no value today and use them in deployment of commercial/industrial fuel production. This would create far more value than shelving the technologies and spending more money to create more technologies.
Commercially-minded algae researchers, algae producers, private industry and private investment are in favor of an Algae Manhattan Project for Fuels, bringing together the best minds and using the proven algae fuel technologies all in one place. The consensus is that such a project would reveal the truth of the Biomass Program, and that is something the DOE will go out of its way to prevent.
If the DOE really wants to help reduce US dependency on foreign oil, a statement that is now being doubted by many, the Biomass Program leadership and the Algae Caucus, if it is more than another group created to create an illusion, both need to take a common sense business approach and use proven parts of algae fuel technologies and not dole out more money for more algae research until we know what is really needed. It’s time to give private industry the rights and benefits that the universities have been unsuccessful with.
With regard to algae co-products, research should not be a function of the DOE. Algae co-products were not the DOE’s original energy mission, do not involve energy and should be handled by other more competent government departments. The Biomass Program has proven its incompetence with the fuel program so why should they be given more?
DOE algae program research should focus on all the rooms and rooms of existing algae fuel technologies sitting on shelves for decades. There is no value in any algae fuel IP to date because no one is using them in commercial production today. Thanks to the DOE leadership and the Algae Caucus, our tax dollars are being used to make these technologies obsolete.
DOE’s algae programs leadership ability to pick winners and losers is very questionable when looking at past results. There is a huge difference between a research mentality and commercialization. Current leadership at the DOE algae research program needs to be replaced with commercially-minded algae researchers, algae producers, private industry and private investment produce industrial algae fuels. We can no longer afford more algae research grants without using existing proven algae fuel technologies today. We need commercially-minded algae researchers, algae producers and equipment companies to take over the algae fuel program, put the algae fuel puzzle together and get the job done. Otherwise they have wasted $2.5 billion in taxpayer dollars over the last 70 years.
The DOE algae research program leadership claimed that they had rooms and rooms of algae technologies sitting on shelves decades ago and that, due to a 1976 Congressional Mandate, could only support more algae research but were prohibited from commercial production of fuels. Algae producers understood that 12 years ago and moved into producing co-products, but nobody at the DOE is willing to approach Congress to amend that mandate. Questions arise by many people around the world on why the DOE Algae Program and Algae Caucus didn’t react when the price of oil was over $100 a barrel? Until things drastically change at the DOE Biomass/BETO/NREL to allow private industry to use, test and scale-up proven parts of algae fuel technologies they will continue to sit on shelves and the tests using algae fuels in automobiles and commercial airlines will be all for naught, and this has been an exercise in how to waste money and not be held accountable.
After spending hundreds of millions on algae fuels research the last decade, where are the promised algae biofuels from all DOE selected companies like Sapphire Energy (“the golden child”) who in 2009 claimed they would be producing 1 million gallons of diesel and jet fuel per year and in January 2010 were awarded a $50 million grant by DOE and a $54.5 million loan guarantee from USDA to substantiate these claims), Solazyme, General Atomics, Algenol, Solix Biofuels, Aurora Biofuels, Synthetic Genomics, Phycal, the government labs like NREL and Sandia, and the universities? In 2010, Solazyme was able to deliver 100% algae-based jet fuel to the Department of Defense and received millions from the DoE for the construction of an integrated biorefinery project. The fuel allegedly met all of the requirements for Naval renewable fuel, aviation fuel, and purportedly met the fuel requirements of the US Air Force and the standards for commercial jet fuel. So, where is it 7 years later? Several companies have replaced all or most of their management teams and have been liquidated, but, with all due respect, we still don’t have commercial production.
Commercial algae producers along with private investment were precluded from the deployment of algae fuels due to the DOE Algae Programs leadership’s unwillingness or inability to go to Congress with proven parts of algae fuel technologies in hand to tell them it was time for commercial deployment. Deployment by commercially-minded algae researchers, algae producers and equipment companies using proven parts of algae fuel technologies would have been profitable when the price of oil was over $100 a barrel. Due to a dysfunctional DOE algae biofuel program there have been more US public sector and government jobs created than ever in the private sector. Private industry and the investment community can only hope the new Secretary of Energy along with our new president-elect can ‘drain the swamp’ and allow private industry to deploy the purported ‘proven’ algae technologies in commercial deployment and scale-up. Once accomplished will finally create value in algae fuel IP/fuel technologies that currently does not exist.
DOE algae research grant programs, lobbyists and the pay-for-play media claims need to be held to a higher standard, accountability and most importantly provide results. Greed, avarice and self-serving interests on the part of those who have access to government grants have not produced commercial deployment of algae fuels to date.
We continue to propose an Algae Manhattan Project for Fuels using the proven parts of algae fuel technologies to make algae fuels a reality. We are confident that the new Secretary of Energy and the new president will take a no-nonsense common sense approach to allow private industry working with select algae fuel experts put all of the proven algae fuel technologies commercial deployment and fuel production. If not, all the algae fuel technologies we have heard about for decades will continue to sit on shelves collecting dust.
ALGAE BIOPRODUCTS: Given the decades of failures in deployment of any algae fuels technologies the DOE has changed its direction to algae co-products.
...
National Algae Association’s Incubator Program - Update
We established the first Algae Incubator Program in the world for algaepreneurs and private industry interested in the emerging commercial algae production industry, and was told a year or two ago that NAA had more algae growing at one of its incubator facilities than at 4 labs funded by the DoE combined.
Both students and private industry learn and receive hands-on training on methods and technologies used in commercial algae cultivation, harvesting, extraction for potential co-products, and to experience the challenges, solutions, markets and opportunities. We currently have new Algae Production Incubator Programs starting throughout the country , but due to the DOE requirements, we cannot let them view our sites. In the new year, NAA plans are to continue working with commercial algae producers throughout the world producing algae co-products. READ MORE
More than 50,000 articles in our online library!
Use the categories and tags listed below to access the nearly 50,000 articles indexed on this website.
Advanced Biofuels USA Policy Statements and Handouts!
- For Kids: Carbon Cycle Puzzle Page
- Why Ethanol? Why E85?
- Just A Minute 3-5 Minute Educational Videos
- 30/30 Online Presentations
- “Disappearing” Carbon Tax for Non-Renewable Fuels
- What’s the Difference between Biodiesel and Renewable (Green) Diesel? 2020 revision
- How to De-Fossilize Your Fleet: Suggestions for Fleet Managers Working on Sustainability Programs
- New Engine Technologies Could Produce Similar Mileage for All Ethanol Fuel Mixtures
- Action Plan for a Sustainable Advanced Biofuel Economy
- The Interaction of the Clean Air Act, California’s CAA Waiver, Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards, Renewable Fuel Standards and California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard
- Latest Data on Fuel Mileage and GHG Benefits of E30
- What Can I Do?
Donate
DonateARCHIVES
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- June 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- October 2006
- April 2006
- January 2006
- April 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- December 1987
CATEGORIES
- About Us
- Advanced Biofuels Call to Action
- Aviation Fuel/Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF)
- BioChemicals/Renewable Chemicals
- BioRefineries/Renewable Fuel Production
- Business News/Analysis
- Cooking Fuel
- Education
- 30/30 Online Presentations
- Competitions, Contests
- Earth Day 2021
- Earth Day 2022
- Earth Day 2023
- Earth Day 2024
- Executive Training
- Featured Study Programs
- Instagram TikTok Short Videos
- Internships
- Just a Minute
- K-12 Activities
- Mechanics training
- Online Courses
- Podcasts
- Scholarships/Fellowships
- Teacher Resources
- Technical Training
- Technician Training
- University/College Programs
- Events
- Coming Events
- Completed Events
- More Coming Events
- Requests for Speakers, Presentations, Posters
- Requests for Speakers, Presentations, Posters Completed
- Webinars/Online
- Webinars/Online Completed; often available on-demand
- Federal Agency/Executive Branch
- Agency for International Development (USAID)
- Agriculture (USDA)
- Commerce Department
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission
- Congressional Budget Office
- Defense (DOD)
- Air Force
- Army
- DARPA (Defense Advance Research Projects Agency)
- Defense Logistics Agency
- Marines
- Navy
- Education Department
- Energy (DOE)
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
- Federal Reserve System
- Federal Trade Commission
- Food and Drug Administration
- General Services Administration
- Government Accountability Office (GAO)
- Health and Human Services (HHS)
- Homeland Security
- Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
- Interior Department
- International Trade Commission
- Joint Office of Energy and Transportation
- Justice (DOJ)
- Labor Department
- National Academy of Sciences
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- National Research Council
- National Science Foundation
- National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Overseas Private Investment Corporation
- Patent and Trademark Office
- Securities and Exchange Commission
- State Department
- Surface Transportation Board
- Transportation (DOT)
- Federal Aviation Administration
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
- Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Admin (PHMSA)
- Treasury Department
- U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)
- White House
- Federal Legislation
- Federal Litigation
- Federal Regulation
- Feedstocks
- Agriculture/Food Processing Residues nonfield crop
- Alcohol/Ethanol/Isobutanol
- Algae/Other Aquatic Organisms/Seaweed
- Atmosphere
- Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
- Field/Orchard/Plantation Crops/Residues
- Forestry/Wood/Residues/Waste
- hydrogen
- Manure
- Methane/Biogas
- methanol/bio-/renewable methanol
- Not Agriculture
- RFNBO (Renewable Fuels of Non-Biological Origin)
- Seawater
- Sugars
- water
- Funding/Financing/Investing
- grants
- Green Jobs
- Green Racing
- Health Concerns/Benefits
- Heating Oil/Fuel
- History of Advanced Biofuels
- Infrastructure
- Aggregation
- Biofuels Engine Design
- Biorefinery/Fuel Production Infrastructure
- Carbon Capture/Storage/Use
- certification
- Deliver Dispense
- Farming/Growing
- Precursors/Biointermediates
- Preprocessing
- Pretreatment
- Terminals Transport Pipelines
- International
- Abu Dhabi
- Afghanistan
- Africa
- Albania
- Algeria
- Angola
- Antarctica
- Argentina
- Armenia
- Aruba
- Asia
- Asia Pacific
- Australia
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
- Bahamas
- Bahrain
- Bangladesh
- Barbados
- Belarus
- Belgium
- Beliz
- Benin
- Bermuda
- Bhutan
- Bolivia
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Botswana
- Brazil
- Brunei
- Bulgaria
- Burkina Faso
- Burundi
- Cambodia
- Cameroon
- Canada
- Caribbean
- Central African Republic
- Central America
- Chad
- Chile
- China
- Colombia
- Congo, Democratic Republic of
- Costa Rica
- Croatia
- Cuba
- Cyprus
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Dominican Republic
- Dubai
- Ecuador
- El Salvador
- Equatorial Guinea
- Eqypt
- Estonia
- Ethiopia
- European Union (EU)
- Fiji
- Finland
- France
- French Guiana
- Gabon
- Georgia
- Germany
- Ghana
- Global South
- Greece
- Greenland
- Guatemala
- Guinea
- Guyana
- Haiti
- Honduras
- Hong Kong
- Hungary
- Iceland
- India
- Indonesia
- Iran
- Iraq
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Ivory Coast
- Jamaica
- Japan
- Jersey
- Jordan
- Kazakhstan
- Kenya
- Korea
- Kosovo
- Kuwait
- Laos
- Latin America
- Latvia
- Lebanon
- Liberia
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Macedonia
- Madagascar
- Malawi
- Malaysia
- Maldives
- Mali
- Malta
- Marshall Islands
- Mauritania
- Mauritius
- Mexico
- Middle East
- Monaco
- Mongolia
- Morocco
- Mozambique
- Myanmar/Burma
- Namibia
- Nepal
- Netherlands
- New Guinea
- New Zealand
- Nicaragua
- Niger
- Nigeria
- North Africa
- North Korea
- Northern Ireland
- Norway
- Oman
- Pakistan
- Panama
- Papua New Guinea
- Paraguay
- Peru
- Philippines
- Poland
- Portugal
- Qatar
- Romania
- Russia
- Rwanda
- Saudi Arabia
- Scotland
- Senegal
- Serbia
- Sierra Leone
- Singapore
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Solomon Islands
- South Africa
- South America
- South Korea
- South Sudan
- Southeast Asia
- Spain
- Sri Lanka
- Sudan
- Suriname
- Swaziland
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Taiwan
- Tanzania
- Thailand
- Timor-Leste
- Togo
- Trinidad and Tobago
- Tunisia
- Turkey
- Uganda
- UK (United Kingdom)
- Ukraine
- United Arab Emirates UAE
- Uruguay
- Uzbekistan
- Vatican
- Venezuela
- Vietnam
- Wales
- Zambia
- Zanzibar
- Zimbabwe
- Marine/Boat Bio and Renewable Fuel/MGO/MDO/SMF
- Marketing/Market Forces and Sales
- Opinions
- Organizations
- Original Writing, Opinions Advanced Biofuels USA
- Policy
- Presentations
- Biofuels Digest Conferences
- DOE Conferences
- Bioeconomy 2017
- Bioenergy2015
- Biomass2008
- Biomass2009
- Biomass2010
- Biomass2011
- Biomass2012
- Biomass2013
- Biomass2014
- DOE Project Peer Review
- Other Conferences/Events
- R & D Focus
- Carbon Capture/Storage/Use
- Co-Products
- Feedstock
- Logistics
- Performance
- Process
- Vehicle/Engine/Motor/Aircraft/Boiler
- Yeast
- Railroad/Train/Locomotive Fuel
- Resources
- Books Web Sites etc
- Business
- Definition of Advanced Biofuels
- Find Stuff
- Government Resources
- Scientific Resources
- Technical Resources
- Tools/Decision-Making
- Rocket/Missile Fuel
- Sponsors
- States
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawai'i
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Midwest
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Native American tribal nation lands
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Puerto Rico
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- Washington DC
- West Coast
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- Sustainability
- Uncategorized
- What You Can Do
tags
© 2008-2023 Copyright Advanced BioFuels USA. All Rights reserved.
Comments are closed.