by Daniel Moore (Axios Pro) The Biden administration finalized long-awaited rules on Friday on a hydrogen production tax credit that loosens some requirements on project developers while maintaining core environmental guardrails.
Why it matters: The Treasury Department's 45V tax credit, established by the IRA, is the biggest federal incentive to jump-start large-scale U.S. production of hydrogen. Industry advocates, backed by the Energy Department, see hydrogen as crucial to slashing emissions from heavy-duty trucking, steel, chemicals, shipping and other sectors that heavily depend on fossil fuels.
Yes, but: The incoming Trump administration could rewrite the rules or scrap the DOE's $8 billion hydrogen hub program. Frank Wolak, president and CEO of the Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Energy Association, said his trade group will hold conversations on "multiple areas where implementation and timing will be up to the incoming Trump-Vance administration." Trump and Republicans, while pledging to roll back some IRA credits this year, could spare 45V and even expand eligibility by knocking down environmental barriers. READ MORE
Related articles
- U.S. Department of the Treasury Releases Final Rules for Clean Hydrogen Production Tax Credit (U.S. Department of Treasury)
- Treasury and IRS Finalize Clean Hydrogen Tax Credit: Rule Largely Relies on Three Pillars and Will Provide Certainty to Projects (Sierra Club)
- Data centers, manufacturing drive spike in projected power demand, report finds: Projected power demand growth in the United States jumped by a factor of five in the past two years, according to a new report (Politico Pro)
- Strategic Industries Surging: Driving US Power Demand (Grid Strategies)
- New hydrogen tax rules face uncertain future: Democrats and their allies welcomed the Treasury Department's final guidance, but Republicans may intervene. (Politico Pro E&E Daily)
- Tycoon’s wild plan for US data centers ignores grid reality: President-elect Donald Trump’s breezy rollout this week of a Dubai real estate developer’s $20 billion pledge shows the chasm between tech’s bold aspirations and electricity supplies. (E&E News Energywire)
Excerpt from U.S. Department of Treasury: Final rules include significant changes and flexibilities to provide investment certainty and drive deployment of clean hydrogen
WASHINGTON – Today, the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury) and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released final rules for the section 45V Clean Hydrogen Production Tax Credit established by the Inflation Reduction Act. The final rules include significant changes and flexibilities that address several key issues to help grow the industry and move projects forward, while adhering to the law’s emissions requirements for qualifying clean hydrogen. With the inclusion of these changes, the final rules provide clarity, investment certainty, and flexibility, including for participants in projects planned as part of the Department of Energy’s Regional Clean Hydrogen Hubs program.
The final rules announced today clarify how producers of hydrogen, including those using electricity from various sources, natural gas with carbon capture, renewable natural gas (RNG), and coal mine methane can determine eligibility for the credit. To qualify for the full credit, projects must also meet prevailing wage and apprenticeship standards, continuing the Biden-Harris Administration’s commitment to put workers at the center of the clean energy economy and ensure clean energy jobs are good-paying jobs.
“These rules incorporate helpful feedback from companies planning investments which will drive significant deployment of clean hydrogen to power heavy industry and help create good-paying jobs,” said U.S. Deputy Secretary of the Treasury Wally Adeyemo. “The Inflation Reduction Act and Bipartisan Infrastructure Law represent the world’s most ambitious policy support of the clean hydrogen industry. Scaling the production of low-carbon fuels like hydrogen will be a big boost to difficult-to-transition sectors of our economy like heavy industry.”
“Clean hydrogen can play a critical role decarbonizing multiple sectors across our economy, from industry to transportation, from energy storage to much more,” said U.S. Deputy Energy Secretary David M. Turk. “The final rules announced today set us on a path to accelerate deployment of clean hydrogen, including at the Department of Energy’s clean Hydrogen Hubs, leading to new economic opportunities all across the country.”
"Over the past two years, our administration has listened to stakeholders across the hydrogen industry, states, advocates, and others,” said John Podesta, Senior Advisor to the President for International Climate Policy. “The extensive revisions we've made in this final rule provide the certainty that hydrogen producers need to keep their projects moving forward and make the United States a global leader in truly green hydrogen."
Treasury and IRS developed the final rules after consideration of roughly 30,000 public comments and many months of intensive collaboration between Treasury, IRS, and expert agencies including the Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency. In the coming weeks, the Department of Energy will release an updated version of the 45VH2-GREET model that producers will use to calculate the section 45V tax credit.
The rules enable pathways for hydrogen produced using both electricity and methane, providing investment certainty while ensuring that clean hydrogen production meets the law’s lifecycle emissions standards. By law, the tax credit’s value is based on the lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of hydrogen production. To qualify as clean hydrogen under the statute, the lifecycle GHG emissions of the hydrogen production process must be no greater than 4 kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e) per kilogram of hydrogen produced. Qualifying clean hydrogen falls into four credit tiers, with hydrogen produced with the lowest GHG emissions receiving the largest credit. Calculation of the lifecycle GHG analysis for the tax credit requires consideration of direct and significant indirect emissions.
Electrolytic hydrogen
For hydrogen production using electricity (e.g. “green” hydrogen using renewables and “pink” hydrogen using nuclear), the final rules incorporate crucial safeguards proposed in December 2023, but with additional clarity and flexibility that will help facilitate clean hydrogen investment. Specifically, the final rules require that taxpayers seeking to use Energy Attribute Certificates (EACs) to attribute electricity use to a specific generator meet certain criteria for temporal matching, deliverability, and incrementality. These safeguards help ensure that electricity consumption for hydrogen meets the statutory lifecycle GHG emissions standards, including that the lifecycle assessment take into account both direct and significant indirect emissions from hydrogen production. As the final regulations explain, without those safeguards, that additional load on the grid from hydrogen production will result in induced emissions.
However, the final rules differ from the proposed rules in several respects:
- New clean power (incrementality): As in the proposed rules, the final rules define electricity generation as incremental if the generator begins commercial operations within 36 months of the hydrogen facility being placed in service, or to the extent a plant increases its capacity within that period. The final rules provide additional pathways for demonstrating incrementality, including:
- Nuclear retirement risk. Electricity produced by nuclear plants meeting certain bright-line indications of being at risk of retirement and certain indications of co-dependence on hydrogen investment will be considered incremental, up to 200 MW per qualifying reactor. This reflects the fact that certain nuclear reactors are at greater risk of retirement based on certain economic factors, and if a nuclear retirement is averted then the additional demand from hydrogen production will not have induced emissions.
- State policies. Electricity generated in states with robust GHG emissions caps paired with clean electricity standards or renewable portfolio standards meeting the criteria set forth in the final rules will be considered incremental, given that, together, those policies can prevent significant induced emissions from hydrogen production. In consultation with expert agencies, Treasury has determined that Washington and California’s policies currently meet these criteria. Additional states could meet the criteria in the future if they adopt robust policies that meet the criteria.
- New Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS). Electricity from a generator that has added CCS within a 36-month window before the hydrogen facility is placed in service will be considered incremental.
- New, deliverable clean power generated annually, with a phase-in to hourly generation (time-matching): The final rules maintain the proposed requirement that EACs meet the temporal matching requirement if the electricity represented by the EAC is generated in the same hour as a hydrogen facility uses electricity to produce hydrogen. The final rules extend the transition allowing annual matching rule two additional years relative to the proposed rules, with hourly matching required starting in 2030 for all facilities.
- Deliverability: The final rules confirm that electricity generated by a facility in the same grid region as the hydrogen facility meets the deliverability requirement, with certain clarifications, including providing a pathway to demonstrate electricity transfers between regions. Grid regions are based on the Department of Energy National Transmission Needs Study.
- Hourly accounting option: Once hourly matching is required, the final rules allow hydrogen producers to determine electricity-related lifecycle emissions on an hour-by-hour basis as long as the annual emissions of the hydrogen production process are under section 45V’s limit of 4 kg of CO2e per kg of hydrogen produced. This option will provide additional investment certainty because it helps producers avoid losing much of the credit value if they cannot procure EACs for a limited number of hours during the year.
Methane-based Hydrogen
The final regulations provide rules for determining eligibility of hydrogen produced using methane reforming technologies, including with carbon capture and sequestration (so-called “blue” hydrogen), as well as with the use of natural gas alternatives such as renewable natural gas (RNG) or coal mine methane.
The final rules aim to enhance the accuracy of upstream methane leakage rates used in determining the credit value. Upstream methane leakage rates will be based on default national values in a forthcoming version of 45VH2-GREET. However, as described in the final regulations, future releases of 45VH2-GREET will incorporate project-specific upstream methane leakage rates, conditional on the availability of appropriate and verified data from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), including under the recently finalized updates to the EPA’s Subpart W rules and rules under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act, regarding oil and gas sector regulations.
For hydrogen production using natural gas alternatives, the final regulations provide rules on how to calculate lifecycle GHG emissions and claim the credit for alternatives sourced from a wider range of biogas and fugitive methane than the proposed rules allowed – including wastewater, animal manure, and landfill gas – and for coal mine methane.
In consideration of comments and with extensive consultation with expert agencies, the final rules provide clarity on the 45V lifecycle GHG emissions determination for those sources, including taking into account emissions in counterfactual scenarios. The final rules take a sound and administrable approach to determining appropriate alternative fates which are used to determine lifecycle emissions according to parameters in 45VH2-GREET.
Further, as the 45V credit requires a lifecycle analysis of each process used to produce hydrogen, the emissions intensities of hydrogen produced using these feedstocks are measured separately (i.e. not blended).
The final rules do not include the “first productive use” requirement that was included in the proposed rules, in part because Treasury and IRS determined that such a rule would have administrative and compliance challenges. Rather, the likelihood that a source would otherwise be productively used is taken into account in assessing the alternative fate of that source.
The final rules aim to enhance development of “book-and-claim” systems for natural gas alternatives such as RNG or coal mine methane by detailing the information that such systems will need to provide. Because these systems will take time to develop, taxpayers will be able to begin using book and claim systems in 2027, upon determination of the Secretary of the Treasury that a system meets the requirements set out in these regulations.
The final rules will enable investment certainty by allowing all types of hydrogen producers the option of using the version of the 45VH2-GREET model that was the most recent when the facility began construction for the duration of the credit. This is in consideration of comments that the prospect of potential changes to the model over time reduces investment certainty. READ MORE
Excerpt from Politico Pro E&E Daily: The Biden administration finalized long-awaited tax guidance Friday for the production of "clean" hydrogen, but the lasting impact — and even survival — of the credits may come down to Hill Republicans.
After intense lobbying, Democrats appear pleased with how the Treasury Department plans to implement the Inflation Reduction Act incentives. But that may not matter.
Even though Republicans have not pointed to the hydrogen incentives as a priority for repeal, Senate Environment and Public Works Chair Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) said it's not off the table.
"I don't think [the hydrogen tax credit] is one of the targets at this point, but I think everything will be on the table," said Capito. "We'll have to see."
The finalized guidance for the 45V hydrogen credit, released Friday, gives the greatest allowances to hydrogen produced with renewable energy and electrolysis, referred to as “green hydrogen."
Lawmakers and groups have engaged in a tug-of-war with the administration over how to promote hydrogen in a climate-friendly way. READ MORE
More than 50,000 articles in our online library!
Use the categories and tags listed below to access the nearly 50,000 articles indexed on this website.
Advanced Biofuels USA Policy Statements and Handouts!
- For Kids: Carbon Cycle Puzzle Page
- Why Ethanol? Why E85?
- Just A Minute 3-5 Minute Educational Videos
- 30/30 Online Presentations
- “Disappearing” Carbon Tax for Non-Renewable Fuels
- What’s the Difference between Biodiesel and Renewable (Green) Diesel? 2020 revision
- How to De-Fossilize Your Fleet: Suggestions for Fleet Managers Working on Sustainability Programs
- New Engine Technologies Could Produce Similar Mileage for All Ethanol Fuel Mixtures
- Action Plan for a Sustainable Advanced Biofuel Economy
- The Interaction of the Clean Air Act, California’s CAA Waiver, Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards, Renewable Fuel Standards and California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard
- Latest Data on Fuel Mileage and GHG Benefits of E30
- What Can I Do?
Donate
DonateARCHIVES
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- June 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- October 2006
- April 2006
- January 2006
- April 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- December 1987
CATEGORIES
- About Us
- Advanced Biofuels Call to Action
- Aviation Fuel/Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF)
- BioChemicals/Renewable Chemicals
- BioRefineries/Renewable Fuel Production
- Business News/Analysis
- Cooking Fuel
- Education
- 30/30 Online Presentations
- Competitions, Contests
- Earth Day 2021
- Earth Day 2022
- Earth Day 2023
- Earth Day 2024
- Executive Training
- Featured Study Programs
- Instagram TikTok Short Videos
- Internships
- Just a Minute
- K-12 Activities
- Mechanics training
- Online Courses
- Podcasts
- Scholarships/Fellowships
- Teacher Resources
- Technical Training
- Technician Training
- University/College Programs
- Events
- Coming Events
- Completed Events
- More Coming Events
- Requests for Speakers, Presentations, Posters
- Requests for Speakers, Presentations, Posters Completed
- Webinars/Online
- Webinars/Online Completed; often available on-demand
- Federal Agency/Executive Branch
- Agency for International Development (USAID)
- Agriculture (USDA)
- Commerce Department
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission
- Congressional Budget Office
- Defense (DOD)
- Air Force
- Army
- DARPA (Defense Advance Research Projects Agency)
- Defense Logistics Agency
- Marines
- Navy
- Education Department
- Energy (DOE)
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
- Federal Reserve System
- Federal Trade Commission
- Food and Drug Administration
- General Services Administration
- Government Accountability Office (GAO)
- Health and Human Services (HHS)
- Homeland Security
- Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
- Interior Department
- International Trade Commission
- Joint Office of Energy and Transportation
- Justice (DOJ)
- Labor Department
- National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- National Research Council
- National Science Foundation
- National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Overseas Private Investment Corporation
- Patent and Trademark Office
- Securities and Exchange Commission
- State Department
- Surface Transportation Board
- Transportation (DOT)
- Federal Aviation Administration
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
- Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Admin (PHMSA)
- Treasury Department
- U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)
- White House
- Federal Legislation
- Federal Litigation
- Federal Regulation
- Feedstocks
- Agriculture/Food Processing Residues nonfield crop
- Alcohol/Ethanol/Isobutanol
- Algae/Other Aquatic Organisms/Seaweed
- Atmosphere
- Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
- Field/Orchard/Plantation Crops/Residues
- Forestry/Wood/Residues/Waste
- hydrogen
- Manure
- Methane/Biogas
- methanol/bio-/renewable methanol
- Not Agriculture
- RFNBO (Renewable Fuels of Non-Biological Origin)
- Seawater
- Sugars
- water
- Funding/Financing/Investing
- grants
- Green Jobs
- Green Racing
- Health Concerns/Benefits
- Heating Oil/Fuel
- History of Advanced Biofuels
- Infrastructure
- Aggregation
- Biofuels Engine Design
- Biorefinery/Fuel Production Infrastructure
- Carbon Capture/Storage/Use
- certification
- Deliver Dispense
- Farming/Growing
- Precursors/Biointermediates
- Preprocessing
- Pretreatment
- Terminals Transport Pipelines
- International
- Abu Dhabi
- Afghanistan
- Africa
- Albania
- Algeria
- Angola
- Antarctica
- Argentina
- Armenia
- Aruba
- Asia
- Asia Pacific
- Australia
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
- Bahamas
- Bahrain
- Bangladesh
- Barbados
- Belarus
- Belgium
- Belize
- Benin
- Bermuda
- Bhutan
- Bolivia
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Botswana
- Brazil
- Brunei
- Bulgaria
- Burkina Faso
- Burundi
- Cambodia
- Cameroon
- Canada
- Caribbean
- Central African Republic
- Central America
- Chad
- Chile
- China
- Colombia
- Congo, Democratic Republic of
- Costa Rica
- Croatia
- Cuba
- Cyprus
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Dominican Republic
- Dubai
- Ecuador
- El Salvador
- Equatorial Guinea
- Eqypt
- Estonia
- Ethiopia
- European Union (EU)
- Fiji
- Finland
- France
- French Guiana
- Gabon
- Georgia
- Germany
- Ghana
- Global South
- Greece
- Greenland
- Guatemala
- Guinea
- Guyana
- Haiti
- Honduras
- Hong Kong
- Hungary
- Iceland
- India
- Indonesia
- Iran
- Iraq
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Ivory Coast
- Jamaica
- Japan
- Jersey
- Jordan
- Kazakhstan
- Kenya
- Korea
- Kosovo
- Kuwait
- Laos
- Latin America
- Latvia
- Lebanon
- Liberia
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Macedonia
- Madagascar
- Malawi
- Malaysia
- Maldives
- Mali
- Malta
- Marshall Islands
- Mauritania
- Mauritius
- Mexico
- Middle East
- Monaco
- Mongolia
- Morocco
- Mozambique
- Myanmar/Burma
- Namibia
- Nepal
- Netherlands
- New Guinea
- New Zealand
- Nicaragua
- Niger
- Nigeria
- North Africa
- North Korea
- Northern Ireland
- Norway
- Oman
- Pakistan
- Panama
- Papua New Guinea
- Paraguay
- Peru
- Philippines
- Poland
- Portugal
- Qatar
- Romania
- Russia
- Rwanda
- Saudi Arabia
- Scotland
- Senegal
- Serbia
- Sierra Leone
- Singapore
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Solomon Islands
- South Africa
- South America
- South Korea
- South Sudan
- Southeast Asia
- Spain
- Sri Lanka
- Sudan
- Suriname
- Swaziland
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Taiwan
- Tanzania
- Thailand
- Timor-Leste
- Togo
- Trinidad and Tobago
- Tunisia
- Turkey
- Uganda
- UK (United Kingdom)
- Ukraine
- United Arab Emirates UAE
- Uruguay
- Uzbekistan
- Vatican
- Venezuela
- Vietnam
- Wales
- Zambia
- Zanzibar
- Zimbabwe
- Marine/Boat Bio and Renewable Fuel/MGO/MDO/SMF
- Marketing/Market Forces and Sales
- Opinions
- Organizations
- Original Writing, Opinions Advanced Biofuels USA
- Policy
- Presentations
- Biofuels Digest Conferences
- DOE Conferences
- Bioeconomy 2017
- Bioenergy2015
- Biomass2008
- Biomass2009
- Biomass2010
- Biomass2011
- Biomass2012
- Biomass2013
- Biomass2014
- DOE Project Peer Review
- Other Conferences/Events
- R & D Focus
- Carbon Capture/Storage/Use
- Co-Products
- Feedstock
- Logistics
- Performance
- Process
- Vehicle/Engine/Motor/Aircraft/Boiler
- Yeast
- Railroad/Train/Locomotive Fuel
- Resources
- Books Web Sites etc
- Business
- Definition of Advanced Biofuels
- Find Stuff
- Government Resources
- Scientific Resources
- Technical Resources
- Tools/Decision-Making
- Rocket/Missile Fuel
- Sponsors
- States
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawai'i
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Midwest
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Native American tribal nation lands
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Puerto Rico
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- Washington DC
- West Coast
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- Sustainability
- Uncategorized
- What You Can Do
tags
© 2008-2023 Copyright Advanced BioFuels USA. All Rights reserved.
Comments are closed.