(U.S. Department of Agriculture) A key deliverable under the Growing Climate Solutions Act, the report identifies opportunities and needed solutions to improve farmers’ access to carbon markets -- U.S Department of Agriculture (USDA) released A General Assessment of the Role of Agriculture and Forestry in the U.S. Carbon Markets (PDF, 1.3 MB), a comprehensive look at current market activity, barriers to participation, and opportunities to improve access to carbon markets for farmers and forest landowners. The report is the first of USDA’s deliverables under the Growing Climate Solutions Act (GCSA), which was signed into law on December 29, 2022, as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023.
“The Biden-Harris Administration is working aggressively to ensure farmers, ranchers, forest landowners, and tribal communities have opportunities to be part of the solution to climate change, all while cultivating new revenue streams and fostering investment in rural communities,” said Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack. “This landmark report demonstrates both the potential and the challenges that carbon markets present for agriculture and forestry.”
As part of a broader effort to combat climate change, carbon markets offer a promising tool to achieve net-zero emissions. Farmers, ranchers, and forest landowners can generate carbon credits by adopting practices to reduce emissions or sequester carbon on their land, and carbon markets may provide them new income opportunities through carbon credit sales. Purchasing these carbon credits may also help companies achieve voluntary greenhouse gas reduction goals.
Today’s report identifies a variety of barriers that have hindered the participation of agriculture in these markets. Among other things, farmers face limited returns on investment due to high transaction costs in carbon markets, including the costs of greenhouse gas quantification, verification, and reporting. However, a clear assessment of these barriers gives federal agencies, scientists, farmers and other partners valuable insight into what kinds of solutions can facilitate increased and more beneficial participation by farmers.
USDA is taking a hard look at how to foster additional confidence and landowner participation in carbon markets. Ensuring the climate benefits represented in these transactions are credible and supported by sound science is essential to making carbon markets work. Earlier this year, USDA also announced the investment of $300 million through President Biden’s Investing in America agenda to improve measurement, monitoring, reporting and verification of greenhouse gas emissions and carbon sequestration in climate-smart agriculture and forestry. This work is critical for enhancing the implementation of climate-smart conservation activities as well as strengthening carbon market opportunities.
Following release of the assessment, the next step in implementing the GCSA is for USDA to make a determination regarding whether to establish the Greenhouse Gas Technical Assistance Provider and Third-Party Verifier Program, which would facilitate better technical assistance to producers interested in participating in carbon markets, as well as a process to register market verifiers.
This report builds on and complements other components of the Biden-Harris Administration’s work to help farmers mitigate climate change and enhance resilience of their operations, while also capitalizing on demand for climate-smart agricultural products.
USDA also recently reported on swift implementation of President Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act, which is the nation’s largest-ever investment to combat climate change. The Inflation Reduction Act made nearly $20 billion available over five years for some of USDA’s most popular conservation programs, and USDA has received three times the demand for the Fiscal Year 2023 funding. As a result of the historic climate investments made by the Inflation Reduction Act, USDA also announced funding for a new program to help underserved and small acreage forest landowners connect to emerging voluntary carbon markets in August 2023.
USDA touches the lives of all Americans each day in so many positive ways. Under the Biden-Harris Administration, USDA is transforming America’s food system with a greater focus on more resilient local and regional food production, fairer markets for all producers, ensuring access to safe, healthy and nutritious food in all communities, building new markets and streams of income for farmers and producers using climate-smart food and forestry practices, making historic investments in infrastructure and clean energy capabilities in rural America, and committing to equity across the Department by removing systemic barriers and building a workforce more representative of America. To learn more, visit www.usda.gov. READ MORE
Related articles
- Report to Congress: A General Assessment of the Role of Agriculture and Forestry in U.S. Carbon Markets Written in support of the Greenhouse Gas Technical Assistance Provider and Third-Party Verifier Program (U.S. Department of Agriculture)
- USDA report weighs agency's role on carbon markets (Agri-Pulse)
- USDA Carbon Market Report Addresses Biochar, Livestock Manure Digestion (Biomass Magazine)
- Watch: Controversies in the voluntary carbon market (S&P Global; includes VIDEO)
- 3 Questions to Consider About Carbon Programs (AgWebO
Excerpt from U.S. Department of Agriculture: TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 1
Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 5 2
Agriculture and Forestry Credits in Carbon Markets ............................................................ 9 2.1
Overview and Key Terms............................................................................................. 9 2.2
Carbon Registries .......................................................................................................10 2.3
Voluntary and Compliance Carbon Markets................................................................11 2.3.1
Compliance Carbon Markets ...................................................................................11 2.3.2
Voluntary Carbon Markets.......................................................................................12 2.3.3
Insetting Programs ..................................................................................................14 2.4
Role of Project Developers and Third-Party Verifiers ..................................................14 2.4.1
Project Developers ..................................................................................................14 2.4.2
Third-Party Verification Bodies ................................................................................15 2.5
Carbon Credit Quality Initiatives..................................................................................15 3
Supply and Demand of Agricultural and Forestry Credits in the United States....................17 3.1
Supply of Agricultural and Forestry Carbon Credits.....................................................17 3.2
Types of Agricultural and Forestry Credits in the United States...................................18 3.2.1
Forestry Project Scope............................................................................................19 3.2.2
Agriculture Project Scope ........................................................................................22 3.2.3
Land Use Project Scope..........................................................................................26 3.2.4
Inactive Protocols ....................................................................................................28 3.3
Carbon Credits Sold....................................................................................................28 3.4
Future Agricultural and Forestry Carbon Credit Supply ...............................................29 3.4.1
Protocols Under Development.................................................................................30 3.5
Future Demand for Carbon Credits .............................................................................30 4
Accounting systems for Agricultural and Forestry Carbon Credit Projects ..........................32 4.1 Overview.....................................................................................................................32 4.2
Quantifying Carbon Credits.........................................................................................32 4.2.1 Complications..........................................................................................................33 4.3
Protocol Design ..........................................................................................................34 4.3.1
Protocol Design Mechanisms to Address Accounting Issues...................................34 4.4
Third-Party verification’s Role in Project Accounting ...................................................37 5
GHG Quantification Systems..............................................................................................39 5.1
State of Greenhouse Gas Quantification Systems ......................................................39 5.2
Monitoring and Measurement Technologies ...............................................................39 5.2.1
Croplands: Process-Based Models..........................................................................40 5.2.2
Croplands: Soil Sampling ........................................................................................41 5.2.3
Livestock: Quantification Methods ...........................................................................41 5.2.4
Forestry: Quantification Methods...............................................................................42 5.2.5
Empirical Models and Emissions Factors ..................................................................43 6
Barriers to Entry .................................................................................................................44 6.1
Barriers to Landowner Participation in Carbon Markets ..............................................44 6.1.1
Return on Investment ..............................................................................................44 6.1.2
Upfront Costs to Implement Projects .......................................................................45 6.1.3
Record Keeping and Data Collection.......................................................................45 6.1.4
Early Adopters.........................................................................................................45 6.1.5
Permanence Requirements.....................................................................................45 6.1.6
Scale .......................................................................................................................46 6.1.7
Market Confusion ....................................................................................................46 6.2
Reducing Barriers to Landowner Carbon Market Participation ....................................47 6.2.1
Reducing Transaction Costs....................................................................................47 6.2.2
Upfront Financing and Forward Crediting ................................................................48 6.2.3
Reducing Record Keeping and Data Collection Burdens.........................................48 6.2.4
Addressing Early Adopter Concerns........................................................................48 6.2.5
Addressing Permanence .........................................................................................49 6.2.6
Addressing Scale Through Project Aggregation ......................................................49 6.2.7
Carbon Market Resources and Standards...............................................................50 6.3
Role of USDA in Reducing Market Barriers.................................................................50 6.3.1
Technical Assistance, Outreach and Education.......................................................50 6.3.2
Conservation Programs...........................................................................................51 6.3.3
Innovative Grants and Partnerships.........................................................................51 6.3.4
Supporting Infrastructure.........................................................................................52 6.3.5
Investments in MMRV .............................................................................................52 6.3.6
Potential Role of Greenhouse Gas Technical Assistance Provider and Third-Party Verification Program...........................................................................................................54 7
Beyond Greenhouse Gases: Other market Opportunities for Ecosystem Services.............55 7.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................55 7.1.1
Payments for Ecosystem Services ..........................................................................56 7.1.2
Mitigation and Conservation Banks .........................................................................56 7.1.3
Habitat Exchanges ..................................................................................................57 7.1.4
Water Rights Trading and Instream Buybacks in the Western United States...........57 7.1.5
Water Quality Trading Programs .............................................................................57 7.1.6
Other Types of Market-Based Mechanisms.............................................................58 7.1.7
Ecosystem Service Markets in the United States.....................................................58 7.1.8
Federal and State-level Fuel Markets ......................................................................59
Appendix tables ........................................................................................................................62
Bibliography ..............................................................................................................................72
Excerpt from AgWeb: When it comes to carbon programs, most U.S. farmers are sitting on the sidelines.
Recent data shows farmer enrollment in the programs is less than 5%. Many are skeptical about climate change or don’t understand how carbon programs work. Others wonder if there’s really any value in them, and some are concerned that carbon programs will become government-mandated, although the U.S. market today is voluntary.
Yet, having worked in agriculture for my entire career and specializing in carbon the past few years, I know farmer awareness and curiosity about these initiatives is expanding dramatically.
Carbon programs pay farmers for carbon credits, which are then sold in the market to someone looking to offset their carbon footprint. In a carbon program, a farmer is required to implement specific practices, and the program should follow a protocol established with a carbon registry, such as the Climate Action Reserve.
If you’re considering enrolling in a carbon program, keep these points in mind:
1. Does it seem too good to be true?
Carbon programs are not a get-rich-quick scheme. If a program is promising you the world and you have to do nothing in return, you should probably ask more questions or consider other options.
2. Is the organization requiring you to purchase something in order to participate or paying you in a credit to purchase something?
Just because it’s a trusted brand from which you’ve purchased crop inputs or services in the past doesn’t mean it’s qualified to deliver on a legitimate carbon project. Most claims that applying specific products will improve carbon sequestration are not backed by legitimate or peer-reviewed research that verify creditable improvements.
3. Do you have enough information?
Ask some technical questions, even if you aren’t an expert. The salesperson’s responses should alert you right away if the program is legitimate and if they are truly knowledgeable in the carbon arena.
Here are a few to consider:
- Are the credits issued through a registry?
- How are the credits verified?
- Who’s doing the verification?
- How are the credits issued, sold and accounted for?
- Who’s buying the credits? At what price?
- How much does this company keep versus how much you, the farmer, receive? READ MORE
More than 50,000 articles in our online library!
Use the categories and tags listed below to access the nearly 50,000 articles indexed on this website.
Advanced Biofuels USA Policy Statements and Handouts!
- For Kids: Carbon Cycle Puzzle Page
- Why Ethanol? Why E85?
- Just A Minute 3-5 Minute Educational Videos
- 30/30 Online Presentations
- “Disappearing” Carbon Tax for Non-Renewable Fuels
- What’s the Difference between Biodiesel and Renewable (Green) Diesel? 2020 revision
- How to De-Fossilize Your Fleet: Suggestions for Fleet Managers Working on Sustainability Programs
- New Engine Technologies Could Produce Similar Mileage for All Ethanol Fuel Mixtures
- Action Plan for a Sustainable Advanced Biofuel Economy
- The Interaction of the Clean Air Act, California’s CAA Waiver, Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards, Renewable Fuel Standards and California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard
- Latest Data on Fuel Mileage and GHG Benefits of E30
- What Can I Do?
Donate
DonateARCHIVES
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- June 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- October 2006
- April 2006
- January 2006
- April 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- December 1987
CATEGORIES
- About Us
- Advanced Biofuels Call to Action
- Aviation Fuel/Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF)
- BioChemicals/Renewable Chemicals
- BioRefineries/Renewable Fuel Production
- Business News/Analysis
- Cooking Fuel
- Education
- 30/30 Online Presentations
- Competitions, Contests
- Earth Day 2021
- Earth Day 2022
- Earth Day 2023
- Earth Day 2024
- Executive Training
- Featured Study Programs
- Instagram TikTok Short Videos
- Internships
- Just a Minute
- K-12 Activities
- Mechanics training
- Online Courses
- Podcasts
- Scholarships/Fellowships
- Teacher Resources
- Technical Training
- Technician Training
- University/College Programs
- Events
- Coming Events
- Completed Events
- More Coming Events
- Requests for Speakers, Presentations, Posters
- Requests for Speakers, Presentations, Posters Completed
- Webinars/Online
- Webinars/Online Completed; often available on-demand
- Federal Agency/Executive Branch
- Agency for International Development (USAID)
- Agriculture (USDA)
- Commerce Department
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission
- Congressional Budget Office
- Defense (DOD)
- Air Force
- Army
- DARPA (Defense Advance Research Projects Agency)
- Defense Logistics Agency
- Marines
- Navy
- Education Department
- Energy (DOE)
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
- Federal Reserve System
- Federal Trade Commission
- Food and Drug Administration
- General Services Administration
- Government Accountability Office (GAO)
- Health and Human Services (HHS)
- Homeland Security
- Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
- Interior Department
- International Trade Commission
- Joint Office of Energy and Transportation
- Justice (DOJ)
- Labor Department
- National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- National Research Council
- National Science Foundation
- National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Overseas Private Investment Corporation
- Patent and Trademark Office
- Securities and Exchange Commission
- State Department
- Surface Transportation Board
- Transportation (DOT)
- Federal Aviation Administration
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
- Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Admin (PHMSA)
- Treasury Department
- U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)
- White House
- Federal Legislation
- Federal Litigation
- Federal Regulation
- Feedstocks
- Agriculture/Food Processing Residues nonfield crop
- Alcohol/Ethanol/Isobutanol
- Algae/Other Aquatic Organisms/Seaweed
- Atmosphere
- Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
- Field/Orchard/Plantation Crops/Residues
- Forestry/Wood/Residues/Waste
- hydrogen
- Manure
- Methane/Biogas
- methanol/bio-/renewable methanol
- Not Agriculture
- RFNBO (Renewable Fuels of Non-Biological Origin)
- Seawater
- Sugars
- water
- Funding/Financing/Investing
- grants
- Green Jobs
- Green Racing
- Health Concerns/Benefits
- Heating Oil/Fuel
- History of Advanced Biofuels
- Infrastructure
- Aggregation
- Biofuels Engine Design
- Biorefinery/Fuel Production Infrastructure
- Carbon Capture/Storage/Use
- certification
- Deliver Dispense
- Farming/Growing
- Precursors/Biointermediates
- Preprocessing
- Pretreatment
- Terminals Transport Pipelines
- International
- Abu Dhabi
- Afghanistan
- Africa
- Albania
- Algeria
- Angola
- Antarctica
- Argentina
- Armenia
- Aruba
- Asia
- Asia Pacific
- Australia
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
- Bahamas
- Bahrain
- Bangladesh
- Barbados
- Belarus
- Belgium
- Belize
- Benin
- Bermuda
- Bhutan
- Bolivia
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Botswana
- Brazil
- Brunei
- Bulgaria
- Burkina Faso
- Burundi
- Cambodia
- Cameroon
- Canada
- Caribbean
- Central African Republic
- Central America
- Chad
- Chile
- China
- Colombia
- Congo, Democratic Republic of
- Costa Rica
- Croatia
- Cuba
- Cyprus
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Dominican Republic
- Dubai
- Ecuador
- El Salvador
- Equatorial Guinea
- Eqypt
- Estonia
- Ethiopia
- European Union (EU)
- Fiji
- Finland
- France
- French Guiana
- Gabon
- Georgia
- Germany
- Ghana
- Global South
- Greece
- Greenland
- Guatemala
- Guinea
- Guyana
- Haiti
- Honduras
- Hong Kong
- Hungary
- Iceland
- India
- Indonesia
- Iran
- Iraq
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Ivory Coast
- Jamaica
- Japan
- Jersey
- Jordan
- Kazakhstan
- Kenya
- Korea
- Kosovo
- Kuwait
- Laos
- Latin America
- Latvia
- Lebanon
- Liberia
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Macedonia
- Madagascar
- Malawi
- Malaysia
- Maldives
- Mali
- Malta
- Marshall Islands
- Mauritania
- Mauritius
- Mexico
- Middle East
- Monaco
- Mongolia
- Morocco
- Mozambique
- Myanmar/Burma
- Namibia
- Nepal
- Netherlands
- New Guinea
- New Zealand
- Nicaragua
- Niger
- Nigeria
- North Africa
- North Korea
- Northern Ireland
- Norway
- Oman
- Pakistan
- Panama
- Papua New Guinea
- Paraguay
- Peru
- Philippines
- Poland
- Portugal
- Qatar
- Romania
- Russia
- Rwanda
- Saudi Arabia
- Scotland
- Senegal
- Serbia
- Sierra Leone
- Singapore
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Solomon Islands
- South Africa
- South America
- South Korea
- South Sudan
- Southeast Asia
- Spain
- Sri Lanka
- Sudan
- Suriname
- Swaziland
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Taiwan
- Tanzania
- Thailand
- Timor-Leste
- Togo
- Trinidad and Tobago
- Tunisia
- Turkey
- Uganda
- UK (United Kingdom)
- Ukraine
- United Arab Emirates UAE
- Uruguay
- Uzbekistan
- Vatican
- Venezuela
- Vietnam
- Wales
- Zambia
- Zanzibar
- Zimbabwe
- Marine/Boat Bio and Renewable Fuel/MGO/MDO/SMF
- Marketing/Market Forces and Sales
- Opinions
- Organizations
- Original Writing, Opinions Advanced Biofuels USA
- Policy
- Presentations
- Biofuels Digest Conferences
- DOE Conferences
- Bioeconomy 2017
- Bioenergy2015
- Biomass2008
- Biomass2009
- Biomass2010
- Biomass2011
- Biomass2012
- Biomass2013
- Biomass2014
- DOE Project Peer Review
- Other Conferences/Events
- R & D Focus
- Carbon Capture/Storage/Use
- Co-Products
- Feedstock
- Logistics
- Performance
- Process
- Vehicle/Engine/Motor/Aircraft/Boiler
- Yeast
- Railroad/Train/Locomotive Fuel
- Resources
- Books Web Sites etc
- Business
- Definition of Advanced Biofuels
- Find Stuff
- Government Resources
- Scientific Resources
- Technical Resources
- Tools/Decision-Making
- Rocket/Missile Fuel
- Sponsors
- States
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawai'i
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Midwest
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Native American tribal nation lands
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Puerto Rico
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- Washington DC
- West Coast
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- Sustainability
- Uncategorized
- What You Can Do
tags
© 2008-2023 Copyright Advanced BioFuels USA. All Rights reserved.
Comments are closed.