(U.S. Department of Energy) The Sustainable Aviation Fuel: Review of Technical Pathways report provides an overview of commercial jet aviation fuel and summarizes learnings from three BETO-supported workshops. In addition, the report focuses on insights for reducing costs and optimizing the value proposition of sustainable aviation fuel. Download the report to learn more.
Cost-competitive sustainable alternative jet fuels and high-performance fuels for aviation are needed to decouple carbon growth from market growth. With this in mind, the U.S. Department of Energy Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) published a report titled Sustainable Aviation Fuel: Review of Technical Pathways.
BETO's report describes potential pathways to produce sustainable alternative fuels suitable for use by the commercial aviation sector. It also presents a vision of low-cost, clean-burning, and low-soot-producing jet fuel uniquely available from renewable and wasted carbon sources. READ MORE
Sustainable Aviation Fuel: Review of Technical Pathways (U.S. Department of Energy)
Excerpt from report: The 106-billion-gallon global (21-billion-gallon domestic) commercial jet fuel market is projected to grow to over 230 billion gallons by 2050 (U.S. EIA 2020a). Cost-competitive, environmentally sustainable aviation fuels (SAFs) are recognized as a critical part of decoupling carbon growth from market growth. Renewable and wasted carbon can provide a path to low-cost, clean-burning, and low-soot-producing jet fuel. Research shows an opportunity to produce fuel in which aromatics are initially diluted with the addition of renewable iso-alkanes, aromatics are later fully replaced with cycloalkanes, and finally high-performance molecules that provide mission-based value to jet fuel consumers are introduced. Key to this fuel pathway is sourcing the three SAF blendstocks—iso-alkanes, cycloalkanes, and high-performing molecules—from inexpensive resources. When resourced from waste carbon, there are often additional benefits, such as cleaner water when sourcing carbon from wet sludges or less waste going to landfills when sourcing the carbon from municipal solid waste or plastic waste. Jet fuel properties differ from gasoline and diesel, so research will be most successful if it begins with the end result in mind.
...
Executive Summary
...
U.S. airlines have improved efficiency by 130% compared to 1978 levels (Airlines for America 2020). Additional efficiency improvements in planes and engines are not likely to be enough. Meeting the 2050 goal will required fuels that have a lower carbon footprint, referred to as sustainable aviation fuel (SAF)—defined by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) as alternative aviation fuels that “(i) achieve net GHG [greenhouse gas] emissions reduction on a life cycle basis; (ii) respect the areas of high importance for biodiversity, conservation and benefits for people from ecosystems, in accordance with international and national regulations; and (iii) contribute to local social and economic development, and competition with food and water should be avoided” (ICAO 2018).
...
A second challenge is that the price of SAF today is higher than petroleum-based Jet A fuel. Fuel price is a hurdle because fuel is 20%–30% of the operating cost of an airline (IATA 2018). Research and development (R&D) can help bring the cost down.
Unlike light-duty vehicles, the low energy density of even the best batteries severely limits opportunities for electrification.1 While many are working on electrification, efforts are for smaller aircraft and airlines will have no alternative for some time but to use SAF to operate in a GHG-emission-constrained future.
Part I of this report provides an overview of commercial jet aviation fuel: how it compares to fuels for cars and trucks, its composition, its specification, and its certification process.
...
Original equipment manufacturer (OEM)-led ASTM D4054 fit-for-purpose testing generally costs several million dollars and can require years to be approved (ASTM 2018). A fast-track approval process has been accepted for fuels in which the SAF blending component is limited to 10% and consists of the same types of molecules that are in petroleum-based jet fuel. A clearinghouse annex has also been proposed to reduce cost and time for approval.
...
Part I finishes by summarizing the learnings from three BETO-supported workshops. These include the Alternative Aviation Fuel Workshop held in Macon, Georgia, in 2016, which focused on SAF production; the JET workshop held in Cleveland, Ohio, in 2017, which focused on high-performance fuels; and the Trilateral Biojet Workshop held in Richland, Washington, in 2018, which focused on jet fuel R&D collaborations between Canada, the United States, and Mexico. Some of the key learnings from these workshops include:
• The aviation industry seeks to reduce its GHG emissions significantly, decoupling airline growth from carbon growth.
• The current cost of SAF is high. Airlines are willing to support SAF development by purchasing some fuel at a higher price, but for SAF to scale, prices need to be reduced.
• OEM-led ASTM D4054 approval and evaluation process is expensive and time-consuming. Developing new engines is even more onerous regarding timescale and cost, and hence a program coupling fuel development and engine development R&D would not help overcome industry barriers.
• Existing engines can use fuels that have a much higher heat of combustion than Jet A, and specific energy (i.e., heat of combustion) increases can deliver greater range, higher payload capacity, or decreased fuel consumption.
• More sources of low-cost feedstock are required as fats, oils, and greases are not currently available in enough volume to meet SAF demand.
• The use of cover crops to increase availability of oil seeds while improving soil quality as well as use of other lipid-rich streams, such as manures and sludges, may increase availability. Processes for their conversion will need to be approved through ASTM.
• Techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life cycle analysis (LCA) are inconsistent across the SAF industry, but the consistent message from most models is that the main cost drivers are feedstock costs, yields, and plant capital recovery.
• Current policies are skewing renewable fuels towards diesel and away from the jet market.
Part II provides insights resulting from a study of the aviation fuel industry, challenges of and successes with
the approved pathways, and BETO capabilities and R&D portfolio.
...
Examples of work could include the following:
• In the near term (0–5 years), research can help further reduce the cost of existing approved pathways to iso-alkanes and synthetic paraffinic kerosene molecules. Research could include low-cost routes to cycloalkanes, including alkylated cyclohexanes, and understanding the properties of molecules with various ring structures available from catalytic, biological, thermal, and hybrid approaches.
• Public–private partnerships and collaborations across agencies may accelerate cost reductions by ensuring a diverse set of stakeholders are involved early in the solution to ensure it can address barriers for industrywide use.
• In the longer term, as SAF volumes increase, aviation fuels may provide better performance and reduced emissions (i.e., soot).
• Use of nontraditional raw materials including carbon oxides, methane, deconstructed plastic, and other waste materials may keep cost in parity with conventional fuels.
BETO’s R&D capabilities and feedstock/technology portfolio provide tools for meeting the technical needs to overcome hurdles preventing SAF deployment, including cost reduction. READ MORE
...
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................... vi
Introduction..........................................................................................................................................................1
Part I – Background.............................................................................................................................................2
1 Jet Fuel Markets............................................................................................................................................3
1.1 Jet Fuel Versus Ground Transportation Fuel Markets.................................................................... 3
1.2 How Is Jet Fuel Similar to and Different from Other Transportation Fuels? ................................. 5
1.3 Why Invest in SAF? ....................................................................................................................... 7
2 Jet Fuel Specifications..................................................................................................................................7
2.1 Properties: Performance, Operability, and Drop-In Requirements................................................. 8
2.1.1 Performance ......................................................................................................................... 8
2.1.2 Operability ........................................................................................................................... 8
2.1.3 Drop-In................................................................................................................................. 9
2.1.4 Other Properties ................................................................................................................. 10
2.1.5 Fuel Properties Derived from Bulk Versus Trace Composition ........................................ 10
2.2 Molecular Families in Jet Fuel ..................................................................................................... 10
2.2.1 n-Alkanes and iso-Alkanes ................................................................................................ 12
2.2.2 Aromatics........................................................................................................................... 12
2.2.3 Cycloalkanes...................................................................................................................... 13
2.2.4 Blended Fuels..................................................................................................................... 14
2.3 Beyond Current Fuels – High Performance.................................................................................. 14
2.4 Review of Chapter 2..................................................................................................................... 15
3 Jet Fuel Certification ................................................................................................................................. 16
3.1 Getting a Fuel Approved .............................................................................................................. 16
3.2 A Fast Track to ASTM Approval................................................................................................. 18
3.3 Currently Approved and Emerging Fuels..................................................................................... 19
3.4 Summary of Current SAFs........................................................................................................... 20
4 Workshop Learnings ................................................................................................................................. 21
4.1 Alternative Aviation Fuel Workshop............................................................................................ 22
4.2 JET Workshop.............................................................................................................................. 23
4.3 Trilateral Canada–Mexico–U.S. Biojet Workshop....................................................................... 23
Part II – Analysis and Insights..................................................................................................................... 25
5 R&D – Fuel Molecules ............................................................................................................................. 26
5.1 Vision: Reduce Aromatic Content and Increase iso-Alkanes and Cycloalkanes ......................... 26
5.2 High-Quality iso-Alkanes............................................................................................................. 28
5.2.1 Crack Large Molecules...................................................................................................... 29
5.2.2 Build Up Small Molecules................................................................................................. 31
5.2.3 Direct Fermentation ........................................................................................................... 32
5.2.4 Summary............................................................................................................................ 32
Sustainable Aviation Fuel: Review of Technical Pathways
5.3 Alkylcycloalkanes, Six-Carbon Rings.......................................................................................... 33
5.3.1 Zeolite-Catalyzed Aromatization Followed by Hydrotreating........................................... 34
5.3.2 Phenol Hydrogenation........................................................................................................ 35
5.4 Cycloalkanes, Other Ring Sizes, and Fused Rings....................................................................... 36
5.4.1 Ring Contraction................................................................................................................ 36
5.4.2 Ring-Forming Reactions.................................................................................................... 36
5.4.3 Ring Motifs in Wood Extractives and Fermentation.......................................................... 36
5.4.4 Esoteric Cycloalkanes........................................................................................................ 37
5.5 Low-Aromatic, High-Energy-Content Fuel Properties ................................................................ 38
5.5.1 Gaps in Understanding Cycloalkane Properties................................................................. 38
5.5.2 Quantifying the Value of SAF ........................................................................................... 39
5.6 Quantifying the Value Added with SAFs..................................................................................... 40
5.7 Summary of Fuel Molecules......................................................................................................... 40
6 R&D -- Cost Reduction............................................................................................................................. 41
6.1 Feedstock-Related Research......................................................................................................... 41
6.1.1 “Solve Another Problem” .................................................................................................. 41
6.1.2 Collected Carbon from Existing or Developing Processes................................................ 42
6.1.3 Waste Gases....................................................................................................................... 42
6.1.4 CO2 as a Carbon Source..................................................................................................... 42
6.2 Reducing Capital Cost.................................................................................................................. 44
6.2.1 Use Current and Distressed Infrastructure ......................................................................... 44
6.2.2 Petroleum Refinery Integration.......................................................................................... 45
6.2.3 Separations......................................................................................................................... 45
6.2.4 R&D Needs for Small-Scale Distributed Refineries.......................................................... 45
6.3 Rethinking Biorefineries............................................................................................................... 46
6.3.1 Sugars to Products, Lignin to Fuels ................................................................................... 46
6.3.2 Focus R&D on Conversion Platforms That Provide Product Flexibility ........................... 46
6.3.3 Feedstock Flexibility to Use Full Capacity........................................................................ 47
6.4 Sourcing Hydrogen....................................................................................................................... 48
6.5 Analysis of Cost Reduction .......................................................................................................... 48
6.6 Summary of Cost Reduction......................................................................................................... 49
7 Summary and Insights............................................................................................................................... 49
7.1 An R&D Strategy for SAF ........................................................................................................... 49
7.2 Insights on R&D........................................................................................................................... 50
7.2.1 Focus R&D on Low-Cost iso- and Cycloalkane Production ............................................. 50
7.2.2 Focus on Low-Cost Feedstocks ......................................................................................... 51
7.2.3 Focus R&D on Conversion Platforms that Provide Product Flexibility ............................ 51
7.2.4 Provide Replacement for Hydrogen Gas in Distributed Processing .................................. 51
7.2.5 Refine and Expand Analysis.............................................................................................. 51
7.2.6 Sequencing R&D to Achieve Impact in the Short, Medium, and Long Term ................... 52
7.3 Cooperative Opportunities for R&D ............................................................................................ 52
7.3.1 Collaboration Between the National Laboratories............................................................. 52
7.3.2 Intersection with FAA Center of Excellence and USDA................................................... 52
Sustainable Aviation Fuel: Review of Technical Pathways
7.3.3 Intersection with North American Partners........................................................................ 53
7.3.4 SAF Working Group.......................................................................................................... 53
References......................................................................................................................................................... 54
Appendix 1. Bioenergy Technologies Office Mission................................................................................... 58
Appendix 2. ASTM Fuel Approval Prescreening Tests ................................................................................ 59
Appendix 3. Workshop Learnings................................................................................................................... 60
A3.1 Macon Workshop ........................................................................................................................ 60
A3.2 Cleveland Workshop ................................................................................................................... 61
A3.2.1 Two Schools of Thought.......................................................................................................... 61
A3.2.2 High-Performance Fuel Options.............................................................................................. 61
A3.2.3 Engine and Combustor Options............................................................................................... 62
A3.2.4 Aircraft On-Board Considerations........................................................................................... 64
A3.2.5 High-Performance Fuel Development to Deployment............................................................. 65
A3.2.6 Key Takeaways........................................................................................................................ 66
A3.3 Richland Workshop..................................................................................................................... 66
A3.3.1 Synopsis of the Workshop Report............................................................................................ 67
A3.3.2 Key Takeaway Messages......................................................................................................... 67
More than 50,000 articles in our online library!
Use the categories and tags listed below to access the nearly 50,000 articles indexed on this website.
Advanced Biofuels USA Policy Statements and Handouts!
- For Kids: Carbon Cycle Puzzle Page
- Why Ethanol? Why E85?
- Just A Minute 3-5 Minute Educational Videos
- 30/30 Online Presentations
- “Disappearing” Carbon Tax for Non-Renewable Fuels
- What’s the Difference between Biodiesel and Renewable (Green) Diesel? 2020 revision
- How to De-Fossilize Your Fleet: Suggestions for Fleet Managers Working on Sustainability Programs
- New Engine Technologies Could Produce Similar Mileage for All Ethanol Fuel Mixtures
- Action Plan for a Sustainable Advanced Biofuel Economy
- The Interaction of the Clean Air Act, California’s CAA Waiver, Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards, Renewable Fuel Standards and California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard
- Latest Data on Fuel Mileage and GHG Benefits of E30
- What Can I Do?
Donate
DonateARCHIVES
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- June 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- October 2006
- April 2006
- January 2006
- April 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- December 1987
CATEGORIES
- About Us
- Advanced Biofuels Call to Action
- Aviation Fuel/Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF)
- BioChemicals/Renewable Chemicals
- BioRefineries/Renewable Fuel Production
- Business News/Analysis
- Cooking Fuel
- Education
- 30/30 Online Presentations
- Competitions, Contests
- Earth Day 2021
- Earth Day 2022
- Earth Day 2023
- Earth Day 2024
- Executive Training
- Featured Study Programs
- Instagram TikTok Short Videos
- Internships
- Just a Minute
- K-12 Activities
- Mechanics training
- Online Courses
- Podcasts
- Scholarships/Fellowships
- Teacher Resources
- Technical Training
- Technician Training
- University/College Programs
- Events
- Coming Events
- Completed Events
- More Coming Events
- Requests for Speakers, Presentations, Posters
- Requests for Speakers, Presentations, Posters Completed
- Webinars/Online
- Webinars/Online Completed; often available on-demand
- Federal Agency/Executive Branch
- Agency for International Development (USAID)
- Agriculture (USDA)
- Commerce Department
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission
- Congressional Budget Office
- Defense (DOD)
- Air Force
- Army
- DARPA (Defense Advance Research Projects Agency)
- Defense Logistics Agency
- Marines
- Navy
- Education Department
- Energy (DOE)
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
- Federal Reserve System
- Federal Trade Commission
- Food and Drug Administration
- General Services Administration
- Government Accountability Office (GAO)
- Health and Human Services (HHS)
- Homeland Security
- Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
- Interior Department
- International Trade Commission
- Joint Office of Energy and Transportation
- Justice (DOJ)
- Labor Department
- National Academy of Sciences
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- National Research Council
- National Science Foundation
- National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Overseas Private Investment Corporation
- Patent and Trademark Office
- Securities and Exchange Commission
- State Department
- Surface Transportation Board
- Transportation (DOT)
- Federal Aviation Administration
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
- Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Admin (PHMSA)
- Treasury Department
- U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)
- White House
- Federal Legislation
- Federal Litigation
- Federal Regulation
- Feedstocks
- Agriculture/Food Processing Residues nonfield crop
- Alcohol/Ethanol/Isobutanol
- Algae/Other Aquatic Organisms/Seaweed
- Atmosphere
- Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
- Field/Orchard/Plantation Crops/Residues
- Forestry/Wood/Residues/Waste
- hydrogen
- Manure
- Methane/Biogas
- methanol/bio-/renewable methanol
- Not Agriculture
- RFNBO (Renewable Fuels of Non-Biological Origin)
- Seawater
- Sugars
- water
- Funding/Financing/Investing
- grants
- Green Jobs
- Green Racing
- Health Concerns/Benefits
- Heating Oil/Fuel
- History of Advanced Biofuels
- Infrastructure
- Aggregation
- Biofuels Engine Design
- Biorefinery/Fuel Production Infrastructure
- Carbon Capture/Storage/Use
- certification
- Deliver Dispense
- Farming/Growing
- Precursors/Biointermediates
- Preprocessing
- Pretreatment
- Terminals Transport Pipelines
- International
- Abu Dhabi
- Afghanistan
- Africa
- Albania
- Algeria
- Angola
- Antarctica
- Argentina
- Armenia
- Aruba
- Asia
- Asia Pacific
- Australia
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
- Bahamas
- Bahrain
- Bangladesh
- Barbados
- Belarus
- Belgium
- Beliz
- Benin
- Bermuda
- Bhutan
- Bolivia
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Botswana
- Brazil
- Brunei
- Bulgaria
- Burkina Faso
- Burundi
- Cambodia
- Cameroon
- Canada
- Caribbean
- Central African Republic
- Central America
- Chad
- Chile
- China
- Colombia
- Congo, Democratic Republic of
- Costa Rica
- Croatia
- Cuba
- Cyprus
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Dominican Republic
- Dubai
- Ecuador
- El Salvador
- Equatorial Guinea
- Eqypt
- Estonia
- Ethiopia
- European Union (EU)
- Fiji
- Finland
- France
- French Guiana
- Gabon
- Georgia
- Germany
- Ghana
- Global South
- Greece
- Greenland
- Guatemala
- Guinea
- Guyana
- Haiti
- Honduras
- Hong Kong
- Hungary
- Iceland
- India
- Indonesia
- Iran
- Iraq
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Ivory Coast
- Jamaica
- Japan
- Jersey
- Jordan
- Kazakhstan
- Kenya
- Korea
- Kosovo
- Kuwait
- Laos
- Latin America
- Latvia
- Lebanon
- Liberia
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Macedonia
- Madagascar
- Malawi
- Malaysia
- Maldives
- Mali
- Malta
- Marshall Islands
- Mauritania
- Mauritius
- Mexico
- Middle East
- Monaco
- Mongolia
- Morocco
- Mozambique
- Myanmar/Burma
- Namibia
- Nepal
- Netherlands
- New Guinea
- New Zealand
- Nicaragua
- Niger
- Nigeria
- North Africa
- North Korea
- Northern Ireland
- Norway
- Oman
- Pakistan
- Panama
- Papua New Guinea
- Paraguay
- Peru
- Philippines
- Poland
- Portugal
- Qatar
- Romania
- Russia
- Rwanda
- Saudi Arabia
- Scotland
- Senegal
- Serbia
- Sierra Leone
- Singapore
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Solomon Islands
- South Africa
- South America
- South Korea
- South Sudan
- Southeast Asia
- Spain
- Sri Lanka
- Sudan
- Suriname
- Swaziland
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Taiwan
- Tanzania
- Thailand
- Timor-Leste
- Togo
- Trinidad and Tobago
- Tunisia
- Turkey
- Uganda
- UK (United Kingdom)
- Ukraine
- United Arab Emirates UAE
- Uruguay
- Uzbekistan
- Vatican
- Venezuela
- Vietnam
- Wales
- Zambia
- Zanzibar
- Zimbabwe
- Marine/Boat Bio and Renewable Fuel/MGO/MDO/SMF
- Marketing/Market Forces and Sales
- Opinions
- Organizations
- Original Writing, Opinions Advanced Biofuels USA
- Policy
- Presentations
- Biofuels Digest Conferences
- DOE Conferences
- Bioeconomy 2017
- Bioenergy2015
- Biomass2008
- Biomass2009
- Biomass2010
- Biomass2011
- Biomass2012
- Biomass2013
- Biomass2014
- DOE Project Peer Review
- Other Conferences/Events
- R & D Focus
- Carbon Capture/Storage/Use
- Co-Products
- Feedstock
- Logistics
- Performance
- Process
- Vehicle/Engine/Motor/Aircraft/Boiler
- Yeast
- Railroad/Train/Locomotive Fuel
- Resources
- Books Web Sites etc
- Business
- Definition of Advanced Biofuels
- Find Stuff
- Government Resources
- Scientific Resources
- Technical Resources
- Tools/Decision-Making
- Rocket/Missile Fuel
- Sponsors
- States
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawai'i
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Midwest
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Native American tribal nation lands
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Puerto Rico
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- Washington DC
- West Coast
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- Sustainability
- Uncategorized
- What You Can Do
tags
© 2008-2023 Copyright Advanced BioFuels USA. All Rights reserved.
Comments are closed.