We are not accepting donations from people or companies in Florida due to unfair reporting requirements and fees not imposed by any other state.

Call to Action for a Truly Sustainable Renewable Future
August 8, 2013 – 5:07 pm | No Comment

-Include high octane/high ethanol Regular Grade fuel in EPA Tier 3 regulations.
-Use a dedicated, self-reducing non-renewable carbon user fee to fund renewable energy R&D.
-Start an Apollo-type program to bring New Ideas to sustainable biofuel and …

Read the full story »
Business News/Analysis

Federal Legislation

Political news and views from Capitol Hill.

More Coming Events

Conferences and Events List in Addition to Coming Events Carousel (above)

Original Writing, Opinions Advanced Biofuels USA

Sustainability

Home » Business News/Analysis, Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Agency, Federal Litigation, Federal Regulation, Funding/Financing/Investing, Opinions, Policy

EPA’s Contradictory Rule Is a Gut Punch to Advanced Biofuels

Submitted by on December 10, 2015 – 11:10 amNo Comment

by Brent Erickson (Biofuels Digest/Biotechnology Industry Organization) After a painful and damaging two-year delay, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) last week published Renewable Fuel Standards (RFS) for 2014, 2015 and 2016. Unfortunately, the agency finalized a rule riddled with contradictions and confusing logic. EPA asserts that Congress gave it the authority to slow down the RFS program; but that is directly contrary to what Congress envisioned.

Congress clearly intended to rip the Band-Aid off America’s addiction to fossil fuels by aggressively replacing them with cleaner biofuels. Instead of providing the certainty of an open and competitive market for cleaner transportation fuel, EPA has left the advanced biofuel industry in limbo, issuing a rule that will likely continue to undercut investment and slow progress in commercializing advanced biofuels at a time when a stable and predictable regulatory framework is badly needed.

EPA’s new rule states a surprising concern to provide relief to oil refiners and to avoid requiring them to change their business model. That concern is not only unwarranted, but also inconsistent with the rest of the rule. The agency roundly and correctly rejects petitions from state governors, petroleum refiners, and national petroleum trade associations calling for a general waiver of the RFS based on economic harm.

Further, EPA emphasizes that renewable fuels, according to the definition established by Congress, reduce or replace fossil fuels. And biofuels have replaced 1.9 billion barrels of foreign oil over the past decade under the RFS, reducing CO2 emissions by 589.3 million metric tons. Congress clearly intended to change the business model of oil refiners, since their model is based on fossil fuel use. EPA never makes clear why the oil refiners require the relief the agency is handing them.

After years of using the proper methodology for determining renewable fuel volumes as Congress intended and directed, EPA suddenly and inexplicably reversed course (first in its initial proposed rule for 2014, issued in November 2013, and then in its final rule for 2014 through 2016), opening itself to legal challenge for violating the plain text of the statute and contravening the statute’s fundamental purposes.

The rapid buildup for the RFS program mandated by the statute was designed to provide market pull for biofuel producers and certainty for the innovators who are commercializing new advanced and cellulosic biofuels. The agency fully acknowledges that its delay undercut investment and hampered the advanced biofuels industry’s ability to produce fuels. BIO estimates that the agency’s delay and flawed interpretation of the general waiver authority has caused a $13.7 billion shortfall in investment for the sector over the past several years.

Contrary to the agency’s assertion, the recently published rule will continue to undermine the renewable fuel industry’s certainty and investors’ confidence, resulting in ongoing shortfalls in investment and delays in commercializing advanced biofuels. Maybe that is what some in the oil industry wanted. Advanced and cellulosic biofuels simply need room to grow without being forced to cannibalize the conventional biofuels markets.

EPA increased the volumes to a small degree, but largely misapplied Congress’s command throughout the new rule. It may well be up to the federal judiciary to put the agency back on track when it comes to applying the appropriate methodology and complying with the requirements of the statute.  READ MORE

Related Post

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Comments are closed.