by Ron Kotrba (Biobased Diesel Daily) California Air Resources Board published proposed amendments Aug. 12 to the state’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard, which, if implemented, would set stricter carbon-intensity (CI) targets, impose significant limitations on vegetable-oil feedstocks and add new sustainability requirements for soybean and canola oils. The agency is only providing a 15-day comment period. Comments are due Aug. 27.
Among the biggest changes affecting biofuels stakeholders in the proposed rulemaking, which can be read in its entirety here, are the step change in CI-reduction targets in one year and the 20 percent companywide cap on biofuels from virgin crop oils like soybeans and canola.
CARB is proposing to modify the near-term increase in stringency to a 9 percent CI reduction in 2025 from the 5 percent year-to-year increase included in the initial amendment proposal.
The agency is proposing this increase “in light of the continued growth in low-carbon fuels and in response to stakeholder feedback requesting an increase in stringency to bring deficits and credits into balance,” CARB stated. “The compliance targets between 2025 and 2030 are adjusted in the 15-day modifications package to smooth the curve between the more ambitious 2025 compliance target and the originally proposed 30 percent reduction in 2030,” which CARB proposes maintaining.
CARB stated that the proposed compliance target for 2025 will take effect for first-quarter 2025 reporting if the proposed amendments become effective prior to April 1, which marks the beginning of the first-quarter reporting period.
“Because the glut of renewable diesel has saturated their credit market, they’re going to bump the target by 9 percent in one year,” Dave Collings, group manager at Worley Consulting, told Biobased Diesel Daily®. “If promulgated, I’m expecting some pretty wild short-term changes in the market. It’s a significant development for the LCFS market that was otherwise facing a glut in credits that might have lasted through 2026. The excess credits may have caused high-cost producers of biodiesel and renewable diesel to go out of business, so it is likely viewed as a lifeline to that industry.”
Perhaps the most contentious amendment in the proposal, however, is the notion of capping biobased diesel from virgin soybean and canola oils at 20 percent on a companywide basis annually “to avoid sending a long-term signal for virgin soy or canola oil to serve California demand,” CARB wrote. “California expects that overall diesel demand will decline in the state over the coming decades due to the state’s portfolio of [zero-emission vehicles] and clean-fuel polices. This proposed addition allows for California to displace up to 100 percent of the state’s current fossil diesel demand with cleaner alternative diesel.”
CARB noted that, for companies that already have a certified fuel pathway prior to the effective date of the amendments, and for which the percentage of biobased diesel produced from virgin soybean oil or canola oil was greater than 20 percent of combined reported biodiesel and renewable diesel quantities for that company’s 2023 LCFS reporting, this provision would take effect Jan. 1, 2028, to provide time to adjust feedstock supply contracts as needed.
All other companies would be subject to this requirement upon the effective date of the amended regulation.
So far, associations such as Clean Fuels Alliance America, the American Soybean Association, the National Oilseed Processors Association and the U.S. Canola Association have been silent publicly about the CARB proposals, none of which has issued a press release or publicly available statement at the time of this article’s publication. Biobased Diesel Daily® reached out to each of these stakeholder organizations to get their feedback on these amendments, which stand to have a devastating effect on their constituents and others up and down the value chain.
“This proposal is far worse than anticipated,” Scott Gerlt, the chief economist for the American Soybean Association, told Biobased Diesel Daily®. “The idea of a cap had been floating around for a bit, but CARB staff seemed to shoot it down hard in their April workshop. CARB staff publicly acknowledged that capping agricultural feedstocks would increase petroleum consumption in the state. Instead, CARB staff were proposed feedstock traceability as an alternative, which was still problematic but didn’t outright remove soy from the LCFS program.”
Gerlt said the Aug. 12 proposal not only completely reverses CARB’s April decision, but the agency has also left the traceability requirements in place.
“All of this is to address land conversion, which is not happening in the United States and is already penalized in soy’s CI score based on very outdated data,” he said. “Furthermore, CARB is proposing the option to stop accepting new biodiesel pathways in 2031. This proposal phases soy biodiesel out in the next 10 years due to CI scores, caps soy use in the next few years—or immediately for some biofuel plants—while also requiring dedicated supply chains with traceability in a couple of years. The LCFS is supposed to be based on science, but the proposal doesn’t update the science while adding components that contradict it.”
Moreover, companywide cap is more restrictive than a program total cap, according to Gerlt.
“Not all biomass-based diesel producers use soybean or canola oil—or at least to the 20 percent level,” he said. “These producers will underutilize their portion of the cap. Unless CARB allows companies to trade credits towards the cap, those underutilized portions essentially create voids toward the total.”
As a result, Gerlt said the aggregate total will be less than 20 percent.
“Additionally, not all plants have the same feedstock options,” he added. “Biofuel plants in the Midwest will likely have a more difficult time complying than a facility located in California.”
Clean Fuels Alliance America told its members privately that it is “deeply disappointed” in the proposal.
“If adopted, these changes would impose caps on credits for soy- and canola-based biodiesel and renewable diesel, without sufficient scientific evidence to support such limitations,” the organization stated. “Such restrictions risk unfairly disadvantaging these low-carbon alternatives, which are proven to reduce emissions while supporting sustainable farming and rural economies.”
Clean Fuels went on to share how biodiesel and renewable diesel have significantly contributed to California’s emissions reductions.
“Currently, more than 3 billion pounds of soybean oil and 1.7 billion pounds of canola oil are used in the state, with biomass-based diesel comprising 73 percent of California’s diesel pool,” the organization stated. “Clean Fuels will submit comments strongly urging CARB to reconsider these legally problematic amendments that threaten to reverse progress in emissions reductions and jeopardize the economic viability of renewable fuels.”
NOPA President and CEO Kailee Tkacz Buller told Biobased Diesel Daily® that “NOPA has been clear in our communications to CARB that—based on CARB’s own analysis and market and scientific data—a vegetable-oil cap or limitation is unwarranted. NOPA members have made $6 billion in investments to expand U.S. crush capacity by 30 percent, but a cap of this kind would undercut these efforts and put future investments into lower-carbon feedstocks and advanced biofuels in doubt. NOPA will continue to engage with CARB to make clear the full impact such a limitation would have on both feedstocks and fuels.”
Except for companies that supply waste feedstock, which will benefit from the new amendments, sources agree that virtually every stakeholder up and down the value chain will suffer as a result of CARB’s new rulemaking if implemented as proposed.
As far as the market in general, Gerlt noted that it is already resulting in lower soybean-oil prices and stock-price movements based on the announcement.
“This announcement is significant, and if CARB follows through, it will have long-term impacts that ramp up [over] time,” he said.
Conventional biofuel producers who rely heavily on soy and canola will have limited opportunities in California.
“Not only will they face the cap, but they will also bear traceability costs under the proposal,” Gerlt said. “Limited access to a large market will naturally put these biofuels at a price disadvantage.”
To Tkacz Buller’s point, this announcement will also have “a chilling effect” on future crush-plant plans, Gerlt pointed out.
“The industry expansion has largely been to serve the biofuel market that has been growing from demand in California,” he said.
In addition, farmers are naturally going to be adversely affected too—and not just by lower prices.
Certainly, less demand for soy- and canola-based biofuels will lower the prices that soy and canola farmers receive, but according to Gerlt, those that are providing feedstock for California will eventually be required to have on-farm audits for sustainability verification.
Furthermore, fuel purchasers in California will have fewer options and face higher prices.
“It may take a few years for this to fully kick in,” Gerlt said. “California is hoping to electrify transportation quite quickly thereby avoiding this outcome.”
The adverse effects don’t just stop with LCFS program participants and farmers though.
“Nearly everyone is hurt,” Gerlt reiterated to Biobased Diesel Daily®. “CARB analysis showed that California residents will suffer higher GHG emissions, contrary to the program’s intentions. California fuel consumers will face higher costs, as will biofuel plants. And, oilseed-crush plants will have lower margins, along with farmers.”
Stakeholders are encouraged to submit comments to CARB by Aug. 27. READ MORE
Related articles
- Everybody hates the LCFS (Politico's California Climate)
- California Proposes Credits Cap for Soy-Based Renewable Diesel (Farm Policy News)
- CARB proposal would strengthen near-term LCFS targets, cap the use of soy and canola feedstock (Ethanol Producer Magazine)
- Clean Fuels Expresses Disappointment in CARB’s LCFS Proposal (Clean Fuels Alliance America)
- Let's Turn Down the Heat on ICE vs. EV (Engine Technology Forum)
Excerpt from Politico's California Climate: Farmers are up in arms about a new proposal to limit credits for soybean- and canola-based renewable diesel. It’s aimed at preventing crop-based fuels from converting more natural land into farmland, thus increasing emissions, and at incentivizing fuel made from waste oils. But renewable diesel refiners and Midwestern farmers who have been building out production capacity to meet California’s demand say they feel like CARB is pulling the rug out from underneath them.
“This is going to become a major political issue in the Corn Belt,” said Scott Irwin, an agricultural economist at the University of Illinois who’s warning about the coming “feedstock wars” between agriculture and environmentalists. “The LCFS is going to have to confront this reality.”
CARB has been tinkering with this program — one of its marquee emissions-reduction efforts, which accounts for nearly all of the country’s renewable diesel consumption and has been duplicated by Oregon, Washington and New Mexico — for an unusually long time.
...
The amendments largely satisfied renewable natural gas producers, who capture methane from landfills, dairies and wastewater treatment plants. But environmental justice groups who wanted a cap on the total volume of crop-based biofuels in the program and to eliminate credits for fuels made from dairy manure aren’t satisfied by a proposal to reduce the length of time that dairies can generate credits.
And petroleum producers, who had already been taking out ads blaming the program for the state’s high gas prices, are now against CARB’s proposal to tighten the emissions threshold 9 percent next year, up from 5 percent.
...
But it’s the changes dealing with soybean- and canola-based fuels that are adding new tinder to the LCFS wars. “I think you’re going to see real opposition to this amendment package,” said Matt Herman, head of demand and advocacy for the Iowa Soybean Association.
California is by far and away the biggest consumer of renewable diesel in the country — its diesel fuel mix is already over half renewable. Of that, around 30 percent of the renewable diesel in the program is made from soy and canola — the rest is from other feedstocks like used cooking oil, tallow and other waste oils. So it’s a big market for midwestern crop growers, who are already on edge as the federal Biodiesel Blenders Tax Credit expires at the end of the year and will be replaced by an Inflation Reduction Act credit that rewards fuels based on carbon intensity, likely resulting in lower payments for soy-based fuel relative to used cooking oil, according to Herman.
While the LCFS would still give unlimited credits to other fuels produced with soy and canola, like sustainable aviation fuel, and producers can still sell to other countries and states, farmers are on alert for the potential for other states to adopt California’s amendments. READ MORE
Excerpt from Clean Fuels Alliance America: Clean Fuels Alliance America expressed disappointment in the California Air Resources Board’s (CARB) recently proposed amendments to its low carbon fuel standard (LCFS). If adopted, these changes would impose caps on credits for soy- and canola-based biodiesel and renewable diesel, without sufficient scientific evidence to support such limitations.
By restricting credit generation for these low-carbon alternatives, CARB risks unfairly disadvantaging biodiesel and renewable diesel—proven solutions that reduce emissions today while supporting sustainable farming and rural economies. Limiting biodiesel and renewable diesel in favor of technologies that will not be fully scalable for many years, even by CARB’s own projections, threatens both environmental progress and innovation.
Biodiesel and renewable diesel have significantly contributed to California’s emissions reductions. Based on data from CARB, last year more than 3 billion pounds of soybean oil and 1.7 billion pounds of canola oil were used in the state, with biomass-based diesel (BMBD) now accounting for 73% of California’s diesel pool.
“These proposed amendments impose significant restrictions on vegetable oil feedstocks, hindering the ability of clean fuels to effectively decarbonize the heavy-duty transportation sector. Moreover, they introduce stricter standards for these fuels than those applied to others, including petroleum,” said Jeff Earl, Director of State Governmental Affairs at Clean Fuels. “These changes unjustly penalize biodiesel and renewable diesel—low-carbon fuels that provide immediate health benefits for California.”
Clean Fuels will submit comments strongly urging CARB to reconsider these amendments that threaten to reverse progress in emissions reductions and jeopardize the economic viability of renewable fuels.
“We believe that collaboration and sound science are crucial to advancing environmental goals without compromising the livelihoods of those who have committed to sustainable energy and rural communities,” said Donnell Rehagen, CEO at Clean Fuels. “Without a robust scientific foundation, these vegetable oil caps, and additional sustainability requirements threaten to undo the progress of our industry.” READ MORE
More than 50,000 articles in our online library!
Use the categories and tags listed below to access the nearly 50,000 articles indexed on this website.
Advanced Biofuels USA Policy Statements and Handouts!
- For Kids: Carbon Cycle Puzzle Page
- Why Ethanol? Why E85?
- Just A Minute 3-5 Minute Educational Videos
- 30/30 Online Presentations
- “Disappearing” Carbon Tax for Non-Renewable Fuels
- What’s the Difference between Biodiesel and Renewable (Green) Diesel? 2020 revision
- How to De-Fossilize Your Fleet: Suggestions for Fleet Managers Working on Sustainability Programs
- New Engine Technologies Could Produce Similar Mileage for All Ethanol Fuel Mixtures
- Action Plan for a Sustainable Advanced Biofuel Economy
- The Interaction of the Clean Air Act, California’s CAA Waiver, Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards, Renewable Fuel Standards and California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard
- Latest Data on Fuel Mileage and GHG Benefits of E30
- What Can I Do?
Donate
DonateARCHIVES
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- June 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- October 2006
- April 2006
- January 2006
- April 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- December 1987
CATEGORIES
- About Us
- Advanced Biofuels Call to Action
- Aviation Fuel/Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF)
- BioChemicals/Renewable Chemicals
- BioRefineries/Renewable Fuel Production
- Business News/Analysis
- Cooking Fuel
- Education
- 30/30 Online Presentations
- Competitions, Contests
- Earth Day 2021
- Earth Day 2022
- Earth Day 2023
- Earth Day 2024
- Executive Training
- Featured Study Programs
- Instagram TikTok Short Videos
- Internships
- Just a Minute
- K-12 Activities
- Mechanics training
- Online Courses
- Podcasts
- Scholarships/Fellowships
- Teacher Resources
- Technical Training
- Technician Training
- University/College Programs
- Events
- Coming Events
- Completed Events
- More Coming Events
- Requests for Speakers, Presentations, Posters
- Requests for Speakers, Presentations, Posters Completed
- Webinars/Online
- Webinars/Online Completed; often available on-demand
- Federal Agency/Executive Branch
- Agency for International Development (USAID)
- Agriculture (USDA)
- Commerce Department
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission
- Congressional Budget Office
- Defense (DOD)
- Air Force
- Army
- DARPA (Defense Advance Research Projects Agency)
- Defense Logistics Agency
- Marines
- Navy
- Education Department
- Energy (DOE)
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
- Federal Reserve System
- Federal Trade Commission
- Food and Drug Administration
- General Services Administration
- Government Accountability Office (GAO)
- Health and Human Services (HHS)
- Homeland Security
- Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
- Interior Department
- International Trade Commission
- Joint Office of Energy and Transportation
- Justice (DOJ)
- Labor Department
- National Academy of Sciences
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- National Research Council
- National Science Foundation
- National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Overseas Private Investment Corporation
- Patent and Trademark Office
- Securities and Exchange Commission
- State Department
- Surface Transportation Board
- Transportation (DOT)
- Federal Aviation Administration
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
- Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Admin (PHMSA)
- Treasury Department
- U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)
- White House
- Federal Legislation
- Federal Litigation
- Federal Regulation
- Feedstocks
- Agriculture/Food Processing Residues nonfield crop
- Alcohol/Ethanol/Isobutanol
- Algae/Other Aquatic Organisms/Seaweed
- Atmosphere
- Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
- Field/Orchard/Plantation Crops/Residues
- Forestry/Wood/Residues/Waste
- hydrogen
- Manure
- Methane/Biogas
- methanol/bio-/renewable methanol
- Not Agriculture
- RFNBO (Renewable Fuels of Non-Biological Origin)
- Seawater
- Sugars
- water
- Funding/Financing/Investing
- grants
- Green Jobs
- Green Racing
- Health Concerns/Benefits
- Heating Oil/Fuel
- History of Advanced Biofuels
- Infrastructure
- Aggregation
- Biofuels Engine Design
- Biorefinery/Fuel Production Infrastructure
- Carbon Capture/Storage/Use
- certification
- Deliver Dispense
- Farming/Growing
- Precursors/Biointermediates
- Preprocessing
- Pretreatment
- Terminals Transport Pipelines
- International
- Abu Dhabi
- Afghanistan
- Africa
- Algeria
- Angola
- Antarctica
- Argentina
- Armenia
- Aruba
- Asia
- Asia Pacific
- Australia
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
- Bahamas
- Bahrain
- Bangladesh
- Barbados
- Belarus
- Belgium
- Beliz
- Benin
- Bermuda
- Bhutan
- Bolivia
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Botswana
- Brazil
- Brunei
- Bulgaria
- Burkina Faso
- Burundi
- Cambodia
- Cameroon
- Canada
- Caribbean
- Central African Republic
- Central America
- Chad
- Chile
- China
- Colombia
- Congo, Democratic Republic of
- Costa Rica
- Croatia
- Cuba
- Cyprus
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Dominican Republic
- Dubai
- Ecuador
- El Salvador
- Equatorial Guinea
- Eqypt
- Estonia
- Ethiopia
- European Union (EU)
- Fiji
- Finland
- France
- French Guiana
- Gabon
- Georgia
- Germany
- Ghana
- Global South
- Greece
- Greenland
- Guatemala
- Guinea
- Guyana
- Haiti
- Honduras
- Hong Kong
- Hungary
- Iceland
- India
- Indonesia
- Iran
- Iraq
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Ivory Coast
- Jamaica
- Japan
- Jersey
- Jordan
- Kazakhstan
- Kenya
- Korea
- Kosovo
- Kuwait
- Laos
- Latin America
- Latvia
- Lebanon
- Liberia
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Macedonia
- Madagascar
- Malawi
- Malaysia
- Maldives
- Mali
- Malta
- Marshall Islands
- Mauritania
- Mauritius
- Mexico
- Middle East
- Monaco
- Mongolia
- Morocco
- Mozambique
- Myanmar/Burma
- Namibia
- Nepal
- Netherlands
- New Guinea
- New Zealand
- Nicaragua
- Niger
- Nigeria
- North Africa
- North Korea
- Northern Ireland
- Norway
- Oman
- Pakistan
- Panama
- Papua New Guinea
- Paraguay
- Peru
- Philippines
- Poland
- Portugal
- Qatar
- Romania
- Russia
- Rwanda
- Saudi Arabia
- Scotland
- Senegal
- Serbia
- Sierra Leone
- Singapore
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Solomon Islands
- South Africa
- South America
- South Korea
- South Sudan
- Southeast Asia
- Spain
- Sri Lanka
- Sudan
- Suriname
- Swaziland
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Taiwan
- Tanzania
- Thailand
- Timor-Leste
- Togo
- Trinidad and Tobago
- Tunisia
- Turkey
- Uganda
- UK (United Kingdom)
- Ukraine
- United Arab Emirates UAE
- Uruguay
- Uzbekistan
- Vatican
- Venezuela
- Vietnam
- Wales
- Zambia
- Zanzibar
- Zimbabwe
- Marine/Boat Bio and Renewable Fuel/MGO/MDO/SMF
- Marketing/Market Forces and Sales
- Opinions
- Organizations
- Original Writing, Opinions Advanced Biofuels USA
- Policy
- Presentations
- Biofuels Digest Conferences
- DOE Conferences
- Bioeconomy 2017
- Bioenergy2015
- Biomass2008
- Biomass2009
- Biomass2010
- Biomass2011
- Biomass2012
- Biomass2013
- Biomass2014
- DOE Project Peer Review
- Other Conferences/Events
- R & D Focus
- Carbon Capture/Storage/Use
- Co-Products
- Feedstock
- Logistics
- Performance
- Process
- Vehicle/Engine/Motor/Aircraft/Boiler
- Yeast
- Railroad/Train/Locomotive Fuel
- Resources
- Books Web Sites etc
- Business
- Definition of Advanced Biofuels
- Find Stuff
- Government Resources
- Scientific Resources
- Technical Resources
- Tools/Decision-Making
- Rocket/Missile Fuel
- Sponsors
- States
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawai'i
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Midwest
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Native American tribal nation lands
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Puerto Rico
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- Washington DC
- West Coast
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- Sustainability
- Uncategorized
- What You Can Do
tags
© 2008-2023 Copyright Advanced BioFuels USA. All Rights reserved.
Comments are closed.