by Brian Dabbs (Politico Pro Energywire) The guidance for the 45V tax credit aims to cut emissions produced by the industry. -- The Treasury Department released heavily anticipated tax guidance Friday that would force companies to use low-carbon or zero-emissions energy to power the hydrogen production process — a move designed to keep emissions in check for the emerging industry.
The regulations for the 45V tax credit, which are available for public comment for 60 days, outline how to qualify for up to $3 per kilogram of the cleanest hydrogen produced with prevailing wages and apprenticeship requirements. The administration says hydrogen produced by fossil fuels with carbon capture will qualify.
Under the plan, a 60-cent credit kicks in for a kilogram of hydrogen produced with four kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent. Producers earn more credits with lower CO2 equivalent emissions.
“Clean hydrogen will be critical in reducing emissions from harder-to-decarbonize sectors like heavy industry and heavy transportation,” John Podesta, senior adviser to President Joe Biden for clean energy innovation and implementation, told reporters ahead of the proposal’s release. “Treasury’s proposal will help build that clean hydrogen industry, while including important environmental safeguards.” READ MORE
Related articles
- Treasury puts out controversial guidance for hydrogen tax credit (The Gazette)
- U.S. Department of the Treasury, IRS Release Guidance on Hydrogen Production Credit to Drive American Innovation and Strengthen Energy Security (U.S. Department of Treasury)
- White House clean-energy spending boom puts Biden in the crosshairs -- The rollout of a multibillion-dollar ‘green’ hydrogen plan may help the U.S. dominate the energy transition — and give critics another target (Washington Post)
- Clean hydrogen production credit rules announced -- Treasury and IRS released proposed 45V guidance on credit for hydrogen production, which may be available to some facilities into the 2040s (PV Magazine)
- Industry leaders blast Treasury’s draft guidance for clean hydrogen tax credits -- Some leading hydrogen producers are already talking about suing to stop the implementation of the Treasury Department’s proposal, according to Mona Dajani, a partner at Baker Botts. (Utility Dive)
- Moderate Democrats fume over Biden hydrogen proposal (The Hill)
- IRA Tax Credits Will Incentivize Cleanest Version of Hydrogen Production (Sierra Club)
- 3 questions will shape Biden’s hydrogen plan (E&E News Energywire)
- Treasury Drops a Hydrogen Bomb -- Behold the brawl between green groups over a new tax credit for hydrogen power. (Wall Street Journal)
- Hydrogen industry slams Biden tax rules -- Democrats Joe Manchin and Tom Carper also expressed disappointment, but the administration says its plan will fuel a clean hydrogen revolution. (Politico Pro Greenwire)
- Manchin, Carper predict Biden will ease hydrogen rules (E&E Daily)
- Treasury gets an earful on hydrogen (Politico's Power Switch)
Excerpt from The Gazette: "The guidance announced today by the Biden-Harris administration will place unnecessary burdens on the still nascent clean hydrogen industry," said Frank Wolak, the president and CEO of the Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Energy Association. "The nation needs common sense solutions for this tax credit that are aligned with the congressional intent to spur robust economic development and create jobs while reducing carbon emissions."
On the other hand, several green hydrogen companies and renewable energy groups, who are likely to benefit the most from the guidance, cheered the proposed rules.
"By adopting strong standards focusing on emissions intensity, the United States will secure a leadership position in the energy transition and catalyze global investment and demand for clean hydrogen to support long-term, economy-wide decarbonization," said Laura Luce, the CEO and founder of the green hydrogen company Hy Stor Energy.
As it stands, the guidance determines the tax credit based on how much carbon emissions are emitted through the hydrogen production process, ranging between 60 cents to $3 per kilogram of hydrogen, with the highest tax credit being limited to wind, solar, and other renewables that were built within the first three years of operation for a hydrogen facility.
The proposed guidelines would also require hydrogen production to be matched with clean power generation annually until 2027. By 2028, the credit criteria will switch to "hourly matching," a standard that has garnered controversy from the industry, which has argued that it's unfeasible to implement.
"If you go to a place like Finland, which has almost a 90% renewable grid, you don't have to worry about time-matching at all," said Andy Marsh, the CEO of Plug Power, a company specializing in producing hydrogen fuel cells. But for a country like the United States, the strategy wouldn't be ideal until the next decade, Marsh said.
The guidance would further require that the clean energy powering hydrogen production be sourced from the same region in efforts to limit how much emissions are emitted from electrolyzer.
The tax credit would also be eligible for hydrogen produced from natural gas combined with carbon capture and storage under certain conditions.
...
However, production of "green" hydrogen — that is, hydrogen produced via non-carbon-emitting energy sources — will be dependent on the development of renewable energy, which has been hindered as utilities struggle to connect solar and wind sources to the grid and permitting approvals for projects lag.
Furthermore, differing visions for how to implement the tax credit have spurred intraparty conflict among Democrats. In an October letter sent to Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Martin Heinrich (D-NM), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), and others urged for the department to keep the guidelines stringent in order to ensure the subsidies will not be used as a lifeline for fossil fuels.
Other Democrats, however, argued for the guidelines to be more flexible in order to spur growth within the industry. Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA) led a group of Democrats in a separate letter to the Treasury, arguing against the very principles the previous group had advocated for. READ MORE
Excerpt from U.S. Department of Treasury: Today the U.S. Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released proposed regulations on the Clean Hydrogen Production Credit established by the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), part of President Biden’s Investing in America agenda and a key pillar of Bidenomics, which is creating good-paying jobs, strengthening energy security, spurring private-sector investment to build the clean energy economy, and combatting the climate crisis.
“The Biden-Harris Administration is driving American innovation in emerging industries to create good-paying jobs, strengthen U.S. energy security, and help the U.S. clear hurdles in our clean energy transition,” said U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Janet L. Yellen. “Incentives in the Inflation Reduction Act are helping to scale production of low-carbon fuels like hydrogen and cut emissions from heavy industry, a difficult-to-transition sector of our economy.”
“Today's announcement will further unprecedented investments in a new, American-led industry as we aim to lead and propel the global clean energy transition,” said U.S. Secretary of Energy Jennifer M. Granholm. “Hydrogen has the potential to clean up America's manufacturing industry, power the transportation sector and shore up our energy security all while delivering good-paying jobs and new economic opportunity to communities in every pocket of America.”
“The Inflation Reduction Act’s hydrogen tax credit will help build a clean hydrogen industry that will be critical in reducing emissions from harder-to-decarbonize sectors like heavy industry and heavy transportation,” said John Podesta, Senior Advisor to the President for Clean Energy Innovation and Implementation.
While clean hydrogen holds considerable potential to reduce emissions across a range of sectors and applications, conventional hydrogen production typically results in significant climate pollution. The Clean Hydrogen Production Credit aims to make production of clean hydrogen with minimal climate pollution more economically competitive and accelerate development of the U.S. clean hydrogen industry. Today’s proposed regulations advance those goals and will support the development of a robust U.S. clean hydrogen industry that creates good-paying jobs, while also reducing carbon emissions.
The Treasury Department’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) provides definitions of key terms in the statute, including lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions, qualified clean hydrogen, and qualified clean hydrogen production facility. The safeguards outlined in the proposed rules are critical to preventing the credit from subsidizing hydrogen production with higher lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions than allowed by the statute.
The NPRM was developed after extensive consultations with experts across the federal government, particularly the Department of Energy (DOE), which oversees Argonne National Lab’s administration of the GREET model, and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which administers the Clean Air Act. The proposed regulations provide guidance based on the statute’s references to the Clean Air Act and the GREET model.
The NPRM also takes comment on important issues where Treasury anticipates providing further clarity and certainty in the final rules. The NPRM will be open for public comment for 60 days once it is published in the Federal Register, and Treasury and the IRS will carefully consider comments before issuing final rules.
THE IRA CLEAN HYDROGEN PRODUCTION CREDIT
The IRA establishes a Clean Hydrogen Production Credit with four technology-neutral credit tiers based on the emissions rate of a hydrogen production process. For hydrogen production facilities meeting prevailing wage and registered apprenticeship requirements, the amount of the credit ranges from $.60 per kilogram (kg) of hydrogen produced to $3 per kg of hydrogen, depending on the lifecycle emissions of the hydrogen production.
The statute requires that credit eligibility be determined under the Clean Air Act’s definition of lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions, including significant indirect emissions, through the point of production. The statute also requires that lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions be determined under the most recent GREET model. The credit is available for 10 years starting on the date that a hydrogen production facility is placed into service for projects that begin construction before 2033, meaning it will remain available for some facilities well into the 2040s.
The NPRM is technology-neutral and describes how taxpayers must use the 45VH2-GREET model developed by Argonne National Laboratory to determine lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions. The statute also requires that to claim the credit, a taxpayer must have production and sale, or use of clean hydrogen verified by a qualified, unrelated third party. For taxpayers unable to use the 45VH2-GREET model because their hydrogen production technology and/or feedstock is not included, those taxpayers may petition the Secretary of the Treasury for a provisional emissions rate analogous to the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions rate calculated using 45VH2-GREET.
HYDROGEN PRODUCED USING ELECTRICITY
The Treasury Department’s proposed rules describe how taxpayers may use energy attribute certificates (EACs), which demonstrate the purchase of clean power, to assess and document qualification for a particular credit tier. The proposed rules explain the three criteria that must be reflected in EACs being purchased by hydrogen producers claiming the tax credit:
- New clean power (Incrementality): Clean power generators that began commercial operations within three years of a hydrogen facility being placed into service are considered new sources of clean power. Generation resulting from a generator’s newly added capacity (“uprates”) are also considered new sources of clean power. The proposed rules also request comments on approaches by which generation from existing clean power generators could be considered to meet the requirements for new clean power under certain circumstances.
- Deliverable clean power: Clean power must be sourced from the same region as the hydrogen producer, as derived from DOE’s 2023 National Transmission Needs Study. The proposed rules also request comment on how to consider transmission of clean power between regions.
- New, deliverable clean power generated annually, with a phase-in to hourly generation (Time-matching): EACs will generally need to be matched to production on an hourly basis—meaning that the claimed generation must occur within the same hour that the electrolyzer claiming the credit is operating. The proposed rules include a transition to allow annual matching until 2028 when hourly tracking systems are expected to be more widely available and seeks comment on this transition timeline.
HYDROGEN PRODUCED USING RENEWABLE NATURAL GAS
The proposed rules detail eligibility requirements for hydrogen production from landfill gas in certain circumstances. Treasury and IRS anticipate finalizing rules in which additional hydrogen production pathways using renewable natural gas (RNG) and fugitive methane, such as coal mine or coal bed methane, qualify and are seeking public comment on conditions for qualification while adhering to the standards in the statute.
SUPPORTING ANALYSIS
The NPRM is supported by a technical paper from DOE that considers how to assess lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions associated with hydrogen production using electricity. Treasury is also citing to a letter from EPA to Treasury explaining how its prior interpretations of the Clean Air Act could inform Treasury’s implementation of the statute given the statutory reference to the Clean Air Act. In addition to the Treasury Department’s NPRM, DOE is releasing the 45VH2-GREET model that taxpayers will use to calculate the 45V credit and an updated GREET user manual.
- Environmental Protection Agency, Letter to Treasury on the definition of lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act to support Treasury’s interpretation and implementation of Internal Revenue Code section 45V, December 22, 2023
- Department of Energy, Assessing Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Associated with Electricity Use for the Section 45V Clean Hydrogen Production Tax Credit, December 22, 2023 READ MORE
Excerpt from E&E News Energywire: The final rules “may be more beneficial comparatively to hydrogen production,” said Timothy Fox, managing director for ClearView Energy, noting that Treasury has “wiggle room” to make changes.
The guidance regulations are available for public comment until Feb. 26. A public hearing is scheduled for late March.
The Biden administration says it hopes the tax credit will lower the cost of hydrogen produced with renewable energy and fossil fuels tied to carbon capture to $1 per kilogram by 2031.
...
As the administration weighs public comments, here are three issues still to be decided in 2024 that could shape the emerging industry.
How do you define new clean energy?
Under the Treasury guidance, a clean electricity source is considered new if it comes online and starts powering the grid within three years before a hydrogen production facility uses it. For example, if a hydrogen facility comes online in January 2026, it must use clean power added to the grid between January 2023 and 2026.
Hydrogen producers also must get official documentation known as energy attribute certificates to prove that the new clean energy is powering their facilities and comes from the same region.
Additionally, the rules allow hydrogen producers to count existing clean electricity — such as wind, solar, nuclear and hydropower facilities — as a new energy source if those facilities increase their generation.
However, Treasury is seeking comments on multiple proposed exemptions.
One proposal would allow 5 to 10 percent of hourly clean energy generation from an existing facility powering the grid before 2023 to count as a new clean energy source. That means that power from some wind or solar farms or nuclear reactors operating now theoretically could qualify.
...
Will nuclear get a boost?
Treasury’s guidance doesn’t detail how “pink” hydrogen producers using nuclear power can benefit from the credit, but it does offer some indirect olive branches to the nuclear industry. Even so, it is yet to be determined how much the incentives might boost reactors.
“A 5 percent threshold really does almost nothing for [pink hydrogen], it just doesn’t make [hydrogen production] financially feasible,” said Marty Pugh, a corporate tax partner at K&L Gates.
Similarly, Barbara de Marigny and Thomas Holmberg, partners at the law firm Baker Botts, said on a joint call that some hydrogen developers, including ones using nuclear power, are “extremely unhappy” with the idea of allowing 5 to 10 percent of hourly clean energy from existing reactors to count as new generation. The incentive is not enough to support the costs of nuclear-powered hydrogen projects, they say.
...
How many fossil fuel projects will qualify?
For “blue” hydrogen producers aiming to use fossil fuels and carbon capture, a key question is whether they should apply for 45V or a different tax credit for carbon capture technology, known as 45Q.
The answer could ultimately impact which projects get supported and the level of industry emissions.
Hydrogen producers cannot use both tax credits for the same facility under the Inflation Reduction Act.
Treasury’s hydrogen guidance adopted the 45VH2-GREET model, which outlines how federal officials will count the emissions for eight types of production, including five methods using fossil fuels with carbon capture. Currently, Treasury is seeking comments on how blue hydrogen producers can verify their rate of carbon capture.
The GREET model requires companies to consider upstream emissions, such as the processing and delivery of fuel, as well as direct emissions from hydrogen production facilities. Analysts say until more specifics on projects are released, it’s uncertain how much blue hydrogen might qualify.
Extensive questions for blue hydrogen producers “demonstrate the proposed regulations’ general aversion to fossil-fuel powered electrolytic hydrogen, and likely will further delay the deployment of a robust hydrogen economy in the United States,” wrote partners at K&L Gates in a blog post.
DOE did not include five types of hydrogen production, including using renewable natural gas from animal lagoons and fossil-fuel-based methane pyrolysis, in the GREET model. Methane pyrolysis is an emerging technology that splits natural gas into hydrogen gas and solid carbon.
The department is seeking comment on other forms of renewable natural gas, aiming for clarity on issues such as the availability of certificates detailing emissions associated with the transportation of the fuel.
For fossil-fuel-based types of hydrogen production not included in the model, companies will have to petition DOE for a provisional emissions rate to determine if their projects can meet the bar for 45V.
As for 45Q, the carbon capture industry is awaiting updated guidance on how to receive that credit, which provides a monetary value for carbon dioxide that’s permanently stored through geologic storage, enhanced oil recovery or use in products.
Finalizing 45Q guidance will be essential to provide the certainty necessary for “carbon management projects to move forward in securing project financing and breaking ground on construction, “ said the Carbon Capture Coalition — a group of companies and organizations supporting the technology — after the release of the hydrogen plan. READ MORE
Excerpt from Politico's Power Switch: The Biden administration’s effort to jump-start the hydrogen power industry has sparked a heated debate over what constitutes “clean” hydrogen — a question that has generated as many as 30,000 answers.
That’s how many comments the Treasury Department received on its draft rules for how hydrogen companies can qualify for generous tax credits included in President Joe Biden’s signature climate law, writes Christian Robles.
The agency held its first public hearing on the rules last week, where industry players and environmentalists duked it out. A major point of contention emerged around Treasury’s proposed requirement that companies use new low-carbon energy sources, rather than existing generators, to make hydrogen fuel.
While hydrogen is by definition carbon-free, it takes energy to make energy — meaning the gas is only as climate-friendly as its production process. The bulk of hydrogen energy produced in the U.S. today is extracted from natural gas, which releases planet-warming pollution into the atmosphere.
The Biden administration’s goal is to produce 10 million metric tons of hydrogen fuel annually by 2030 using new solar, wind or other renewable power. The rationale is that using electricity from the grid — without adding new clean power to meet the increased demand — would boost fossil fuel use.
But critics of Treasury’s proposal say the requirement threatens to kneecap the nascent industry. It could, for example, stymie the use of nuclear energy, which is carbon-free, to produce hydrogen, argued Dorothy Davidson, CEO of the MachH2 hydrogen hub. Building new nuclear reactors is too expensive and takes too long to be worth it for her company, which is in negotiations with the Energy Department for up to $1 billion in federal funding.
Another company CEO, Andy Vesey of Fortescue Future Industries, said the requirement to use new clean power sources would take five years or more to fulfill, delaying operations and increasing costs by 20 percent.
Still, at least four companies have said they plan to move forward with major hydrogen projects that comply with Treasury’s rules, said Erik Kamrath, a hydrogen advocate for the Natural Resources Defense Council.
That’s enough to produce 6 million metric tons of clean hydrogen, according to the White House. READ MORE
More than 50,000 articles in our online library!
Use the categories and tags listed below to access the nearly 50,000 articles indexed on this website.
Advanced Biofuels USA Policy Statements and Handouts!
- For Kids: Carbon Cycle Puzzle Page
- Why Ethanol? Why E85?
- Just A Minute 3-5 Minute Educational Videos
- 30/30 Online Presentations
- “Disappearing” Carbon Tax for Non-Renewable Fuels
- What’s the Difference between Biodiesel and Renewable (Green) Diesel? 2020 revision
- How to De-Fossilize Your Fleet: Suggestions for Fleet Managers Working on Sustainability Programs
- New Engine Technologies Could Produce Similar Mileage for All Ethanol Fuel Mixtures
- Action Plan for a Sustainable Advanced Biofuel Economy
- The Interaction of the Clean Air Act, California’s CAA Waiver, Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards, Renewable Fuel Standards and California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard
- Latest Data on Fuel Mileage and GHG Benefits of E30
- What Can I Do?
Donate
DonateARCHIVES
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- June 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- October 2006
- April 2006
- January 2006
- April 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- December 1987
CATEGORIES
- About Us
- Advanced Biofuels Call to Action
- Aviation Fuel/Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF)
- BioChemicals/Renewable Chemicals
- BioRefineries/Renewable Fuel Production
- Business News/Analysis
- Cooking Fuel
- Education
- 30/30 Online Presentations
- Competitions, Contests
- Earth Day 2021
- Earth Day 2022
- Earth Day 2023
- Earth Day 2024
- Executive Training
- Featured Study Programs
- Instagram TikTok Short Videos
- Internships
- Just a Minute
- K-12 Activities
- Mechanics training
- Online Courses
- Podcasts
- Scholarships/Fellowships
- Teacher Resources
- Technical Training
- Technician Training
- University/College Programs
- Events
- Coming Events
- Completed Events
- More Coming Events
- Requests for Speakers, Presentations, Posters
- Requests for Speakers, Presentations, Posters Completed
- Webinars/Online
- Webinars/Online Completed; often available on-demand
- Federal Agency/Executive Branch
- Agency for International Development (USAID)
- Agriculture (USDA)
- Commerce Department
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission
- Congressional Budget Office
- Defense (DOD)
- Air Force
- Army
- DARPA (Defense Advance Research Projects Agency)
- Defense Logistics Agency
- Marines
- Navy
- Education Department
- Energy (DOE)
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
- Federal Reserve System
- Federal Trade Commission
- Food and Drug Administration
- General Services Administration
- Government Accountability Office (GAO)
- Health and Human Services (HHS)
- Homeland Security
- Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
- Interior Department
- International Trade Commission
- Joint Office of Energy and Transportation
- Justice (DOJ)
- Labor Department
- National Academy of Sciences
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- National Research Council
- National Science Foundation
- National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Overseas Private Investment Corporation
- Patent and Trademark Office
- Securities and Exchange Commission
- State Department
- Surface Transportation Board
- Transportation (DOT)
- Federal Aviation Administration
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
- Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Admin (PHMSA)
- Treasury Department
- U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)
- White House
- Federal Legislation
- Federal Litigation
- Federal Regulation
- Feedstocks
- Agriculture/Food Processing Residues nonfield crop
- Alcohol/Ethanol/Isobutanol
- Algae/Other Aquatic Organisms/Seaweed
- Atmosphere
- Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
- Field/Orchard/Plantation Crops/Residues
- Forestry/Wood/Residues/Waste
- hydrogen
- Manure
- Methane/Biogas
- methanol/bio-/renewable methanol
- Not Agriculture
- RFNBO (Renewable Fuels of Non-Biological Origin)
- Seawater
- Sugars
- water
- Funding/Financing/Investing
- grants
- Green Jobs
- Green Racing
- Health Concerns/Benefits
- Heating Oil/Fuel
- History of Advanced Biofuels
- Infrastructure
- Aggregation
- Biofuels Engine Design
- Biorefinery/Fuel Production Infrastructure
- Carbon Capture/Storage/Use
- certification
- Deliver Dispense
- Farming/Growing
- Precursors/Biointermediates
- Preprocessing
- Pretreatment
- Terminals Transport Pipelines
- International
- Abu Dhabi
- Afghanistan
- Africa
- Albania
- Algeria
- Angola
- Antarctica
- Argentina
- Armenia
- Aruba
- Asia
- Asia Pacific
- Australia
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
- Bahamas
- Bahrain
- Bangladesh
- Barbados
- Belarus
- Belgium
- Beliz
- Benin
- Bermuda
- Bhutan
- Bolivia
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Botswana
- Brazil
- Brunei
- Bulgaria
- Burkina Faso
- Burundi
- Cambodia
- Cameroon
- Canada
- Caribbean
- Central African Republic
- Central America
- Chad
- Chile
- China
- Colombia
- Congo, Democratic Republic of
- Costa Rica
- Croatia
- Cuba
- Cyprus
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Dominican Republic
- Dubai
- Ecuador
- El Salvador
- Equatorial Guinea
- Eqypt
- Estonia
- Ethiopia
- European Union (EU)
- Fiji
- Finland
- France
- French Guiana
- Gabon
- Georgia
- Germany
- Ghana
- Global South
- Greece
- Greenland
- Guatemala
- Guinea
- Guyana
- Haiti
- Honduras
- Hong Kong
- Hungary
- Iceland
- India
- Indonesia
- Iran
- Iraq
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Ivory Coast
- Jamaica
- Japan
- Jersey
- Jordan
- Kazakhstan
- Kenya
- Korea
- Kosovo
- Kuwait
- Laos
- Latin America
- Latvia
- Lebanon
- Liberia
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Macedonia
- Madagascar
- Malawi
- Malaysia
- Maldives
- Mali
- Malta
- Marshall Islands
- Mauritania
- Mauritius
- Mexico
- Middle East
- Monaco
- Mongolia
- Morocco
- Mozambique
- Myanmar/Burma
- Namibia
- Nepal
- Netherlands
- New Guinea
- New Zealand
- Nicaragua
- Niger
- Nigeria
- North Africa
- North Korea
- Northern Ireland
- Norway
- Oman
- Pakistan
- Panama
- Papua New Guinea
- Paraguay
- Peru
- Philippines
- Poland
- Portugal
- Qatar
- Romania
- Russia
- Rwanda
- Saudi Arabia
- Scotland
- Senegal
- Serbia
- Sierra Leone
- Singapore
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Solomon Islands
- South Africa
- South America
- South Korea
- South Sudan
- Southeast Asia
- Spain
- Sri Lanka
- Sudan
- Suriname
- Swaziland
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Taiwan
- Tanzania
- Thailand
- Timor-Leste
- Togo
- Trinidad and Tobago
- Tunisia
- Turkey
- Uganda
- UK (United Kingdom)
- Ukraine
- United Arab Emirates UAE
- Uruguay
- Uzbekistan
- Vatican
- Venezuela
- Vietnam
- Wales
- Zambia
- Zanzibar
- Zimbabwe
- Marine/Boat Bio and Renewable Fuel/MGO/MDO/SMF
- Marketing/Market Forces and Sales
- Opinions
- Organizations
- Original Writing, Opinions Advanced Biofuels USA
- Policy
- Presentations
- Biofuels Digest Conferences
- DOE Conferences
- Bioeconomy 2017
- Bioenergy2015
- Biomass2008
- Biomass2009
- Biomass2010
- Biomass2011
- Biomass2012
- Biomass2013
- Biomass2014
- DOE Project Peer Review
- Other Conferences/Events
- R & D Focus
- Carbon Capture/Storage/Use
- Co-Products
- Feedstock
- Logistics
- Performance
- Process
- Vehicle/Engine/Motor/Aircraft/Boiler
- Yeast
- Railroad/Train/Locomotive Fuel
- Resources
- Books Web Sites etc
- Business
- Definition of Advanced Biofuels
- Find Stuff
- Government Resources
- Scientific Resources
- Technical Resources
- Tools/Decision-Making
- Rocket/Missile Fuel
- Sponsors
- States
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawai'i
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Midwest
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Native American tribal nation lands
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Puerto Rico
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- Washington DC
- West Coast
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- Sustainability
- Uncategorized
- What You Can Do
tags
© 2008-2023 Copyright Advanced BioFuels USA. All Rights reserved.
Comments are closed.