by Chris Clayton (DTN Progressive Farmer) 2023 will shape up as a major year in the permitting and development of carbon pipelines across the Midwest and Plains states. The Minnesota and South Dakota Public Utilities Commissions each this week will examine the permits of major carbon pipeline projects.
The Minnesota PUC is expected on Thursday, Jan. 5 to hear a permit application by Summit Carbon Solutions to cross two counties in southwest Minnesota.
South Dakota's PUC also has hearings set on Jan. 5 for both Summit and the Navigator Heartland Greenway project.
The actions come as Summit Carbon last week released comments from South Dakota ethanol producers who stated that South Dakota's PUC is slow walking the permit process in that state. Summit released a statement listing CEOs and board members for five ethanol plants in South Dakota calling for the state's PUC to hold Summit's permit hearing in April.
...
Each company has contracted with roughly 30 ethanol plants, and other industries such as fertilizer. Summit and Navigator are each looking to sink between 12 million and 15 million metric tons of carbon dioxide annually. The ethanol industry sees the pipelines as a major opportunity to lower the carbon intensity of corn-based ethanol and achieve better scoring for carbon credits in states with low-carbon fuel standards.
Tax credits for carbon sequestration, known as 45Q, were increased from $50 per metric ton to $85 per mt. The bill also provided the Department of Energy with up to $40 billion in loans for carbon sequestration and transportation projects.
AgWeek reported that the South Dakota PUC on Dec. 20 had directed staff to look at moving the hearing dates back to at least next September, even though staff had suggested holding Summit's hearing in April or May. The South Dakota PUC wants at least ten days of hearings.
Litigation and local regulation are crossing paths with the projects as well. Summit has filed federal lawsuits against at least four South Dakota counties, the Aberdeen, S.D., News reported last month. The lawsuits come after Brown, Edmunds, McPherson and Spink counties in S.D., had each passed permit moratoriums blocking Summit's pathway. Alverson also has joined each of those lawsuits as a plaintiff with Summit.
Summit, however, also is facing dozens of lawsuits from South Dakota landowners, AgWeek reported.
In Iowa, more counties also are introducing ordinances to regulate carbon sequestration pipelines.
...
Radio Iowa also reported last week that the Iowa Legislature will look at new rules for pipelines this year as well. READ MORE
Iowa GOP lawmaker pitches bills to restrict CO2 pipelines: Sioux Center Republican aims to ban eminent domain power (The Gazette)
PIPELINE SURVEY LAW ENFORCEMENT VARIES BY IOWA COUNTY (Iowa Capital Dispatch/Successful Farming)
Biden energy agenda exposes regulatory gap (E&E News)
Iowa House looks to limit eminent domain for carbon capture pipelines. How it would work (Des Moines Register)
Iowa House looks to limit eminent domain for carbon capture pipelines. How it would work:
"It’s very important to those of us who signed onto this that we try to protect landowners," said Rep. Steven Holt. "Our issue is not with the pipeline but with the use of eminent domain…" (Des Moines Register)
Excerpt from Iowa Capital Dispatch/Successful Farming: From Lee County, in Iowa’s southeast corner, the pipeline would cross into Illinois.
The projects have prompted significant debate about property rights, primarily centered on whether the private companies should be allowed to use eminent domain to force easements with landowners. But some residents have also tried to prevent the companies from surveying their land.
Those surveys help determine the precise path and depth of the pipe, and Iowa law allows the surveys after companies have held informational meetings about their projects and have given landowners and tenants a 10-day notice of the surveys.
That part of the law is being challenged on two fronts in court: Some landowners have asked judges to decide that the law is unconstitutional. Also, a surveyor is charged with trespassing in northwest Iowa.
A motion to dismiss that charge is pending in district court in Dickinson County. In that case, a tenant and landowners rejected all mailed land-survey notices from Summit Carbon Solutions, and the sheriff’s office charged a surveyor with trespassing in August because a survey crew returned to the property after the tenant had turned another away.
The Lee County residents — who oppose the project — say their situation is different: They received notice of a required informational meeting but heard nothing about the surveys before they saw crews digging on their properties.
“Farmers take a lot of pride in their land, and we don’t feel they should have the right to come on our land and do what they want to do,” said Mark Meierotto, who farms near West Point. “We have never gotten notified about a survey.”
NAVIGATOR SAYS NOTICE WAS MAILED TO PROPERTY OWNERS
Andy Bates, a spokesperson for Navigator, said a survey notice was sent by certified mail to Meierotto on Jan. 26, 2022, but that the company has no signed receipt of its delivery.
“Transparency, communication, and respect of landowner rights are core to Navigator’s mission,” Bates wrote in an email. “We have, and continue to, work with landowners to obtain voluntary survey permissions, along with gathering the necessary contact information so landowners can be kept abreast of the work of the survey crews if they so wish.”
Another landowner in the area, Ray Menke, said he provided his phone number to Navigator during one of the informational meetings to help schedule a land survey but wasn’t called and didn’t receive written notice. He said a survey crew went onto his property in spring 2022, and Menke told them to leave. He agreed to let them come back to finish the work about a week later because of the state law that allows the surveys.
“They’re gonna be on there anyway,” Menke reasoned. “I just wanted to be with them.”
Another landowner in the area, Andrew Johnson, has pursued trespassing charges for the surveyors, who he says have gone onto his property at least three times. Johnson said he also has not received written notice of the surveys.
...
Bates said Johnson and Menke were both mailed notices of surveys via certified mail in January 2022 and that the company has signed receipts indicating they were delivered three days after they were sent.
PROSECUTOR TELLS PROPERTY OWNER THE LAW CREATES ‘INJUSTICE’
County Attorney Ross Braden declined to comment, but Braden explained his legal dilemma to Johnson in an email in December. He cited Iowa Code that says: “The entry for land surveys shall not be deemed a trespass.”
...
Braden did not rule out a trespassing charge and said he would work to ensure that Johnson is compensated for damage to his land from the digging. The law says the companies must pay for damage caused by the survey work.
...
The Iowa Utilities Board, which governs the pipeline permitting process, has not received any reports or complaints from landowners about a lack of notification for the Navigator surveys, said Don Tormey, an IUB spokesperson.
SURVEYOR CHARGED IN DICKINSON COUNTY
In northwest Iowa, the Dickinson County Sheriff’s Office filed a trespassing charge because it was unclear whether a landowner and tenant had been properly notified of the survey work.
“If you’ve been asked to leave, you’re supposed to leave, otherwise it’s trespassing,” Dickinson County Sheriff Greg Baloun has said.
Dickinson County Attorney Steven Goodlow, who is prosecuting that charge, has argued that Summit should have obtained a court-ordered injunction to gain access to a property from which its surveyors were barred. Final arguments about whether the case should be dismissed concluded this month, and a judge’s decision is pending.
Iowa law allows the pipeline companies to seek injunctions to get access to land. Court records associated with Summit’s injunction requests in regard to a handful of landowners show that the company sent at least two survey notices to the landowners via certified mail before seeking the injunctions.
...
A northwest Iowa lawmaker introduced several bills last week that would change the rules for the pipeline companies. One would prohibit the companies from conducting land surveys without landowner permission. It has been assigned to a subcommittee but has not yet been scheduled for a hearing. READ MORE
Excerpt from E&E News: New liquefied natural gas export terminals and hydrogen projects — as well as thousands of miles of carbon dioxide pipelines — could be built before many federal regulations overseeing them are updated or put into place.
...
For example, LNG, carbon dioxide pipelines and hydrogen are each generally covered by existing regulations administered by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), which is part of the Department of Transportation, but there are no rules specifically on hydrogen pipelines. Current regulations for LNG terminals, meanwhile, were written in 1980 at the end of the Carter administration and don’t account for hazardous chemicals now used for exporting gas. PHMSA also says its standards for CO2 pipelines need updating after a pipeline ruptured in Mississippi three years ago.
But delaying new projects while the regulatory process catches up could hinder the Biden administration’s hopes for companies to deploy new technologies and create new jobs while reducing the effects of climate change. It could also cost companies billions and slow progress in cutting emissions.
...
Experts in the three energy technologies industries say they’re not really so new, but are being talked about more because they’re being deployed more widely. Scientists, companies and regulators have been dealing with them for decades, albeit on a smaller scale, they say.
“They’ve been around a long time, and they have a pretty good safety record,” Xan Fishman, the director of energy policy and carbon management at the Bipartisan Policy Center. What’s dangerous, he said, is hindering action to rein in climate change.
“The clock is ticking on achieving net zero in time,” he said. “We have to start acting now.”
Some climate hawks, though, contend hydrogen, natural gas exports and carbon capture pipelines are the wrong response to climate change. Opponents say they’re really just ways for fossil fuel companies to respond to climate scrutiny without substantial changes to their business models. Others say all three could help cut emissions, including by displacing higher-emitting fossil fuels (Energywire, May 13, 2022).
The race between regulation and technological progress is well-known and closely watched in the regulatory world, said Cary Coglianese, a law professor at the University of Pennsylvania who heads the Penn Program on Regulation.
“It’s a standard debate over what we would call the precautionary approach,” Coglianese said. “We often have regulation follow technology after we’ve seen some of the problems.”
Under the precautionary approach, he said, the government blocks companies’ plans until proven safe, as with drug approval at the Food and Drug Administration. Under a lighter touch, regulators wait to tailor rules to the problems that develop after new technologies are deployed. It becomes a problem, though, if regulators fail to respond to problems.
...
Carbon dioxide pipelines that carry gaseous CO2 at lower pressures are not covered by existing rules. And current regulations don’t require operators to notify regulators if they’re blending hydrogen into existing gas pipelines.
...
Carbon capture
Pipelines that carry captured CO2 are an integral part of efforts by ethanol, fossil fuel and other smokestack industries to adapt their operations as pressure grows for a net-zero economy. Experts have said as many as 65,000 miles of such pipelines will be needed for the country to reach net zero by 2050 (Greenwire, May 30, 2022). The 2021 infrastructure law included billions in funding for carbon capture demonstration and pilot projects.
Most immediately, the drive to capture carbon from ethanol plants and store it permanently underground is driving three large-scale projects in the Midwest. Summit Carbon Solutions LLC, Wolf Carbon Solutions US LLC and Navigator CO2 Ventures LLC all have proposed thousands of miles to carry the greenhouse gas to injection sites.
It doesn’t appear that federal regulations will fully be in place to oversee those lines when they start construction.
Summit, which has said the Midwest Carbon Express would be the largest carbon capture system in the world, also said it is hoping to begin construction in 2024 on its Iowa-centered project, which includes 2,000 miles of pipeline.
Regulators at PHMSA aren’t expecting to have a first draft, or “notice of proposed rulemaking,” of potential carbon dioxide pipeline rules until October 2024. In the meantime, though, agency officials say they’re working to provide new guidance and “lessons learned” that can be provided to companies more quickly.
Environmentalists and conservative farmers have mounted a resistance to the Midwest projects, protesting the likely use of eminent domain to condemn land for construction and raising safety concerns.
Opponents point to a 2020 rupture of a carbon dioxide pipeline in Satartia, Miss., that sent 45 people to the hospital. That line carried CO2, mixed with hydrogen sulfide. The rupture produced a plume of CO2 that crested a hill and reached the town. People in and around Satartia reported smelling the rotten-egg odor of hydrogen sulfide, then feeling dizzy or even passing out.
Critics have called for a moratorium on CO2 pipelines until revised federal regulations are completed. But that could be a long way off, and project developers don’t want to wait that long.
The Biden administration launched an effort last year to write new rules for the safety of CO2 pipelines, citing the Mississippi incident. Currently, there are roughly 5,150 miles of existing CO2 pipelines in the United States. Most, including the Mississippi pipeline that ruptured, ship carbon that will be injected underground to force crude to the surface through a process known as enhanced oil recovery.
Shipping carbon dioxide can create unique challenges. The pipelines operate at much higher pressures than natural gas transmission lines. A safety expert said last year that CO2 lines are more susceptible to ductile fractures that essentially “unzip” the steel and open great lengths of the pipeline.
Bill Caram, executive director of the Pipeline Safety Trust, an advocacy group, said most of the existing carbon dioxide pipelines run through remote areas, but that is likely to change as the technology grows.
“When you look at the scope it will take to make a difference on climate change, these pipelines will be much closer to people,” Caram said.
Carbon dioxide also is a colorless, odorless asphyxiant. Heavier than air, the fear is that it could form a cloud that would move along the ground, displace oxygen and envelop people who wouldn’t even realize the danger.
Carbon capture supporters say the fears are overblown and the safety record of the pipelines is good. CO2 has been shipped and used for years to force oil from underground under pressure. Matt Fry, senior policy manager for carbon management at the Great Plains Institute, a group dedicated to climate change mitigation, said it’s always good to revise and update regulations, but he also said carbon pipelines are safe.
“I feel like we’ve been capturing and transporting carbon dioxide over 50 years now,” Fry said. “I feel like the safety regulations are sufficient. I think we’ve proven that.”
Fry, who said he’s worked in carbon management for 20 years, said regulators might have more time to catch up than it appears.
“These projects don’t have permits in place,” he said. “Their timeline is probably not realistic.”
Hydrogen
With hydrogen, natural gas companies are looking to blend the fuel into existing gas lines and other infrastructure as a way to lower their carbon footprint. But experts haven’t reached a consensus on how to do so safely.
Hydrogen is not toxic and, when released, rises quickly away from the ground. But it can ignite more easily than natural gas and its flame is nearly invisible. It can also make steel brittle in pipelines, which can lead to leaks and ruptures.
The opportunities and dangers were highlighted recently when the Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) released a technical report on blending hydrogen into the natural gas system.
“The concept of blending hydrogen into natural gas pipelines is not new and has been around for decades, but there remain large knowledge gaps,” Mark Chung, NREL’s hydrogen systems analysis lead, said in a news release.
The gas industry is already moving forward on its plans. One major gas utility — Southern California Gas Co. — is already pushing for construction of a hydrogen-only pipeline. The Angeles Link, as it’s known, would produce “green” hydrogen using wind and solar power in rural California and ship it into the Los Angeles Basin (Energywire, Dec. 19, 2022).
But a recent report released by the advocacy group Pipeline Safety Trust said, among other findings, that hydrogen should never be put into most existing gas pipelines (Energywire, Jan. 18). The American Gas Association sent Pipeline Safety Trust a rebuttal, vouching for the safety of hydrogen and noting that it is already being used in some pipelines.
PHMSA currently is overseeing the roughly 1,500 miles of hydrogen pipelines in the country under the general rules for gas pipelines. Safety advocates say they don’t account for important differences in shipping hydrogen, along with transportation by truck and other methods.
PHMSA hasn’t taken any formal steps to change regulations specifically for hydrogen. Agency officials note they are funding 10 research projects into hydrogen safety, from leak detection to integrity management. It is also funding research on CO2 pipelines.
The research on safety is scant comfort for Caram of Pipeline Safety Trust. In fact, he said it shows that basic questions about hydrogen remain unanswered even as utilities make plans to incorporate it into the fuel supply that serves homes and businesses throughout the country.
“If they really believe everything is fine, that there’s no new questions and they’re ready to go, they wouldn’t need to spend all this money on research” Caram said.
And the usefulness of the hydrogen research could be limited if rules were completed before the research is done. He noted that PHMSA has strict prohibitions on regulating pipelines already in the ground and facilities already built.
“We get all this research on the best way to prevent ruptures, and PHMSA will be prohibited from requiring any of that for pipelines already in the ground,” Caram said. READ MORE
More than 50,000 articles in our online library!
Use the categories and tags listed below to access the nearly 50,000 articles indexed on this website.
Advanced Biofuels USA Policy Statements and Handouts!
- For Kids: Carbon Cycle Puzzle Page
- Why Ethanol? Why E85?
- Just A Minute 3-5 Minute Educational Videos
- 30/30 Online Presentations
- “Disappearing” Carbon Tax for Non-Renewable Fuels
- What’s the Difference between Biodiesel and Renewable (Green) Diesel? 2020 revision
- How to De-Fossilize Your Fleet: Suggestions for Fleet Managers Working on Sustainability Programs
- New Engine Technologies Could Produce Similar Mileage for All Ethanol Fuel Mixtures
- Action Plan for a Sustainable Advanced Biofuel Economy
- The Interaction of the Clean Air Act, California’s CAA Waiver, Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards, Renewable Fuel Standards and California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard
- Latest Data on Fuel Mileage and GHG Benefits of E30
- What Can I Do?
Donate
DonateARCHIVES
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- June 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- October 2006
- April 2006
- January 2006
- April 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- December 1987
CATEGORIES
- About Us
- Advanced Biofuels Call to Action
- Aviation Fuel/Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF)
- BioChemicals/Renewable Chemicals
- BioRefineries/Renewable Fuel Production
- Business News/Analysis
- Cooking Fuel
- Education
- 30/30 Online Presentations
- Competitions, Contests
- Earth Day 2021
- Earth Day 2022
- Earth Day 2023
- Earth Day 2024
- Executive Training
- Featured Study Programs
- Instagram TikTok Short Videos
- Internships
- Just a Minute
- K-12 Activities
- Mechanics training
- Online Courses
- Podcasts
- Scholarships/Fellowships
- Teacher Resources
- Technical Training
- Technician Training
- University/College Programs
- Events
- Coming Events
- Completed Events
- More Coming Events
- Requests for Speakers, Presentations, Posters
- Requests for Speakers, Presentations, Posters Completed
- Webinars/Online
- Webinars/Online Completed; often available on-demand
- Federal Agency/Executive Branch
- Agency for International Development (USAID)
- Agriculture (USDA)
- Commerce Department
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission
- Congressional Budget Office
- Defense (DOD)
- Air Force
- Army
- DARPA (Defense Advance Research Projects Agency)
- Defense Logistics Agency
- Marines
- Navy
- Education Department
- Energy (DOE)
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
- Federal Reserve System
- Federal Trade Commission
- Food and Drug Administration
- General Services Administration
- Government Accountability Office (GAO)
- Health and Human Services (HHS)
- Homeland Security
- Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
- Interior Department
- International Trade Commission
- Joint Office of Energy and Transportation
- Justice (DOJ)
- Labor Department
- National Academy of Sciences
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- National Research Council
- National Science Foundation
- National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Overseas Private Investment Corporation
- Patent and Trademark Office
- Securities and Exchange Commission
- State Department
- Surface Transportation Board
- Transportation (DOT)
- Federal Aviation Administration
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
- Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Admin (PHMSA)
- Treasury Department
- U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)
- White House
- Federal Legislation
- Federal Litigation
- Federal Regulation
- Feedstocks
- Agriculture/Food Processing Residues nonfield crop
- Alcohol/Ethanol/Isobutanol
- Algae/Other Aquatic Organisms/Seaweed
- Atmosphere
- Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
- Field/Orchard/Plantation Crops/Residues
- Forestry/Wood/Residues/Waste
- hydrogen
- Manure
- Methane/Biogas
- methanol/bio-/renewable methanol
- Not Agriculture
- RFNBO (Renewable Fuels of Non-Biological Origin)
- Seawater
- Sugars
- water
- Funding/Financing/Investing
- grants
- Green Jobs
- Green Racing
- Health Concerns/Benefits
- Heating Oil/Fuel
- History of Advanced Biofuels
- Infrastructure
- Aggregation
- Biofuels Engine Design
- Biorefinery/Fuel Production Infrastructure
- Carbon Capture/Storage/Use
- certification
- Deliver Dispense
- Farming/Growing
- Precursors/Biointermediates
- Preprocessing
- Pretreatment
- Terminals Transport Pipelines
- International
- Abu Dhabi
- Afghanistan
- Africa
- Albania
- Algeria
- Angola
- Antarctica
- Argentina
- Armenia
- Aruba
- Asia
- Asia Pacific
- Australia
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
- Bahamas
- Bahrain
- Bangladesh
- Barbados
- Belarus
- Belgium
- Beliz
- Benin
- Bermuda
- Bhutan
- Bolivia
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Botswana
- Brazil
- Brunei
- Bulgaria
- Burkina Faso
- Burundi
- Cambodia
- Cameroon
- Canada
- Caribbean
- Central African Republic
- Central America
- Chad
- Chile
- China
- Colombia
- Congo, Democratic Republic of
- Costa Rica
- Croatia
- Cuba
- Cyprus
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Dominican Republic
- Dubai
- Ecuador
- El Salvador
- Equatorial Guinea
- Eqypt
- Estonia
- Ethiopia
- European Union (EU)
- Fiji
- Finland
- France
- French Guiana
- Gabon
- Georgia
- Germany
- Ghana
- Global South
- Greece
- Greenland
- Guatemala
- Guinea
- Guyana
- Haiti
- Honduras
- Hong Kong
- Hungary
- Iceland
- India
- Indonesia
- Iran
- Iraq
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Ivory Coast
- Jamaica
- Japan
- Jersey
- Jordan
- Kazakhstan
- Kenya
- Korea
- Kosovo
- Kuwait
- Laos
- Latin America
- Latvia
- Lebanon
- Liberia
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Macedonia
- Madagascar
- Malawi
- Malaysia
- Maldives
- Mali
- Malta
- Marshall Islands
- Mauritania
- Mauritius
- Mexico
- Middle East
- Monaco
- Mongolia
- Morocco
- Mozambique
- Myanmar/Burma
- Namibia
- Nepal
- Netherlands
- New Guinea
- New Zealand
- Nicaragua
- Niger
- Nigeria
- North Africa
- North Korea
- Northern Ireland
- Norway
- Oman
- Pakistan
- Panama
- Papua New Guinea
- Paraguay
- Peru
- Philippines
- Poland
- Portugal
- Qatar
- Romania
- Russia
- Rwanda
- Saudi Arabia
- Scotland
- Senegal
- Serbia
- Sierra Leone
- Singapore
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Solomon Islands
- South Africa
- South America
- South Korea
- South Sudan
- Southeast Asia
- Spain
- Sri Lanka
- Sudan
- Suriname
- Swaziland
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Taiwan
- Tanzania
- Thailand
- Timor-Leste
- Togo
- Trinidad and Tobago
- Tunisia
- Turkey
- Uganda
- UK (United Kingdom)
- Ukraine
- United Arab Emirates UAE
- Uruguay
- Uzbekistan
- Vatican
- Venezuela
- Vietnam
- Wales
- Zambia
- Zanzibar
- Zimbabwe
- Marine/Boat Bio and Renewable Fuel/MGO/MDO/SMF
- Marketing/Market Forces and Sales
- Opinions
- Organizations
- Original Writing, Opinions Advanced Biofuels USA
- Policy
- Presentations
- Biofuels Digest Conferences
- DOE Conferences
- Bioeconomy 2017
- Bioenergy2015
- Biomass2008
- Biomass2009
- Biomass2010
- Biomass2011
- Biomass2012
- Biomass2013
- Biomass2014
- DOE Project Peer Review
- Other Conferences/Events
- R & D Focus
- Carbon Capture/Storage/Use
- Co-Products
- Feedstock
- Logistics
- Performance
- Process
- Vehicle/Engine/Motor/Aircraft/Boiler
- Yeast
- Railroad/Train/Locomotive Fuel
- Resources
- Books Web Sites etc
- Business
- Definition of Advanced Biofuels
- Find Stuff
- Government Resources
- Scientific Resources
- Technical Resources
- Tools/Decision-Making
- Rocket/Missile Fuel
- Sponsors
- States
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawai'i
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Midwest
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Native American tribal nation lands
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Puerto Rico
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- Washington DC
- West Coast
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- Sustainability
- Uncategorized
- What You Can Do
tags
© 2008-2023 Copyright Advanced BioFuels USA. All Rights reserved.
Comments are closed.