We Need a Disruption to Grow

Business News/Analysis, Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Agency/Executive Branch, Federal Regulation, Marketing/Markets and Sales, Opinions, Other Conferences/Events, Policy, Presentations

May 24, 2017

Print This Article Share it With Friends

by David VanderGriend (Ethanol Producer Magazine/Urban Air Initiative/ICM) … Urban Air Initiative will be part of a group with diverse perspectives on what can be done to disrupt the establishment in order to access higher blends. These experts will address how we can work with the auto and fuel industries, the U.S. EPA, as well as issues around infrastructure, regulation, policy and public perception.

While the ethanol industry faces uncertainty under this new administration, ethanol’s value is undisputable. One of the panelists understands that better than anyone. Professional drift racer and millennial consumer Alec Hohnadell has suffered the dire health effects of gasoline aromatics first hand.

Hohnadell runs E98 in his car on the Formula Drift Circuit, and not just because it’s a great race fuel that boosts his horsepower. He also chooses ethanol because it’s a healthier option, greatly reducing the toxic chemicals in the fuel he handles and what he breathes from the tailpipe.

…

Faulty data and regulations greatly limit ethanol’s path forward.

We are all keenly aware of major industry challenges such as the need for the Reid vapor pressure waiver to be extended to higher blends. But did you know that last year, through a Freedom of Information Act request, UAI learned that fuel experts from major oil companies were responsible for supplying match blended test fuels that were used in flawed key EPA fuel studies?

Not surprisingly, the results of these fuel tests incorrectly pointed to ethanol as the culprit behind rising emissions rather than aromatics. And if that isn’t enough to make you cringe, the EPA relies on these slanted test results when making policy decisions that discourage higher ethanol blends, such as in the MOVES 2014 model.

Another panelist will discuss the position that the EPA has been incorrectly interpreting the law, effectively requiring the ethanol industry to prove the fuel is good. Instead, UAI contends EPA bears the burden to prove the opposite. This notion would eliminate years of unnecessary studies like what we went through with E15 and could open the door to higher blends of ethanol today. In addition, autos could certify with E30 and the vehicle would pass for all levels below. READ MORE

Comments are closed.

Advanced BioFuels USA