by Elizabeth Weise, Stephen J. Beard, Suhail Bhat, Ramon Padilla, Carlie Procell, Karina Zaiets (USA TODAY) Across America, local bans, moratoriums and construction impediments are blocking wind and solar energy with increasing levels of red tape. ... The U.S. has set a goal to reach 100% clean energy by 2035, but a nationwide analysis by USA TODAY shows that achieving it is increasingly unlikely – local governments are banning green power faster than they’re building it.
At least 15% of counties in the U.S. have effectively halted new utility-scale wind, solar, or both, USA TODAY found. These are not the solar panels you might have on your house but installations significant enough to replace power plants, each one powering tens of thousands of homes.
The limits come in the form of outright bans, moratoriums, construction impediments and other conditions that make green energy difficult to build.
The opposition to renewable energy isn't as simple as left vs. right. There’s no one group fighting renewables. Instead, there are many, with a range of objections. But the overall result is rapidly increasing the limits on clean energy.
...
Sixty percent of the country's energy comes from fossil fuels such as coal and natural gas. To get close to 100% carbon-free energy, which includes nuclear and hydroelectric power, utility-scale solar and wind electricity production must ramp up significantly.
...
While 183 counties got their first commercial wind-power project in the past decade, nearly 375 counties blocked new wind development in the same period.
...
Even counties that have never had wind projects (but are near counties that have) are more likely to block new projects.
...
When it comes to wind, one common requirement involves the height of a turbine and its distance from adjacent property lines.
...
Another impediment involves noise limits. In the 2010s, common concerns about wind turbines included health impacts from a swishing noise made by the blades. While these fears have been discounted by research, decibel limits remain.
...
The National Renewable Energy Laboratory calculated the U.S. would require just 10,424 square miles to accommodate the necessary wind and solar farms. READ MORE
Related articles
- Community Opposition and Grid Challenges Slow the Pace of Renewable Efforts, National Survey of Developers Shows -- “The newest bottleneck has been social acceptance.” (Inside Climate News)
- What’s slowing down America’s clean energy transition? It’s not the cost -- New report finds renewable energy faces organised opposition and grid connectivity issues. (Aljazeera)
- Brown University Study Documents Links Between National & Local Offshore Wind Opponents (Clean Technica)
- The War On Renewables Heats Up Across America (Clean Technica)
- Internet data centers are fueling drive to old power source: Coal (Washington Post)
- EV sales set to jump 21% this year, but grid trouble looms (Politico Pro Energywire)
- Renewable Energy Projects Face Increasing Public Opposition (North American Clean Energy)
- American Support for EVs, Solar and Wind Energy Wanes, Pew Says: Republicans see greatest drop in renewables support in survey; Electric vehicles also face limited interest among Americans (Bloomberg)
- Here’s what Americans think of local wind and solar development (Electrek)
- HOW AMERICANS VIEW NATIONAL, LOCAL AND PERSONAL ENERGY CHOICES -- 1. Views on energy development in the U.S. (Pew Research Center)
- Why are Midwest grid operators turning away wind power? (U.S. Energy Information Administration)
- Report highlights battery fire risks -- ‘Co-located projects remain half-exposed to dangers despite battery management progress’ (ReNEWS.Biz)
- Biden-Harris Administration Invests $371 Million in 20 Projects to Accelerate Transmission Permitting Across America (U.S. Department of Energy)
- Directing regions to work together to build and pay for needed transmission (Politico's Power Shift)
- Residents angry, dissatisfied with answers during forum on PSEG transmission line (Frederick News Post)
- Skyrocketing PJM power prices reflect grid troubles: Electricity demand is starting to eclipse supply. But critics blame PJM for not acting swiftly to add wind and solar to the grid. (E&E News Energywire)
- House Republicans, FERC chair spar over transmission rule (Politico Pro)
- New York grid may see reliability shortfall in next decade, preliminary report finds: The draft analysis shows a risk of blackouts without significant new generation. (Politico Pro)
- Young, McKay, Carter openly oppose PSEG project; county officials call for more transparency (Frederick News Post)
- Residents push back against proposed transmission line; PSEG nears decision on preferred route (Frederick News Post)
- Final proposed MPRP route chosen, about 800 letters sent to property owners (Frederick News Post)
- Enraged, distressed residents tell PSEG to stop proposed regional transmission line (Frederick News Post)
- Gov. Moore expresses 'grave concerns' about MPRP planning process, will request meeting with developers (Frederick News Post)
- State agency alleges PJM's power procurement rules will unfairly hike costs for consumers (Frederick News Post)
Excerpt from North American Clean Energy: According to a recent survey from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, community opposition is now among the top reasons for delays and cancellations of wind and solar projects. Survey respondents noted that in their experience a third of the projects were canceled because of community opposition, and half were delayed six months or more.
“Community opposition has become a significant obstacle to renewable energy development,” shares Learnewable Founder and President, Jeremy Solomon, “even though surveys show that substantial majorities support renewable energy development. People want to understand what impact a renewable energy project is going to have on their daily lives. Social acceptance is essential for projects to be completed.”
And the stakes are high. The Berkeley Lab survey revealed sunk costs due to cancellations averaged $2 million per solar project and $7.5 million per wind project. When reviewing why projects were canceled, survey respondents recognized they should have involved communities earlier.
“Developers need a clear picture of community sentiment so they can address community concerns and communicate in a more effective way,” Solomon continues. “Having the ability to assess public sentiment in a data-oriented, quantitative manner to is now a necessity for successful renewable energy development.” READ MORE
Excerpt from Bloomberg: The Pew report, titled How Americans View National, Local and Personal Energy Choices, also shows tempered interest in EVs, with surveyed respondents showing reluctance to embrace initiatives aimed at phasing out gas-powered vehicles. Three in 10 Americans would consider buying an EV. The survey also showed 83% of Republicans oppose rules to expand EV sales compared to 35% of Democrats.
Automakers have been pulling back big bets on EVs as consumers recoil from pricey plug-in cars. Ford Motor Co. is cutting EV spending by $12 billion and delaying new battery-powered models and factories, while market leader Tesla Inc. has slashed EV prices and seen profit margins shrink READ MORE
Excerpt from U.S. Energy Information Administration: As wind generation capacity has grown in the Midwest of the United States, grid operators have increasingly restricted wind generation because of both oversupply and congestion on the grid.
Grid operators in the areas overseen by the Southwest Power Pool (SPP) and Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) curtailed an hourly average of 800 megawatts (MW) of wind generation in the Midwest last year, compared with less than 200 MW in 2019. Curtailment is when electricity generation is deliberately reduced below its maximum generation potential. Wind generation increased by 42% between 2019 and 2023 and makes up a substantial proportion of the energy mix in the Midwest. Hourly average Midwest wind curtailments decreased last year from a 2022 record of almost 1,000 MW because of less generation brought on by slower-than-normal wind speeds. Grid operators also made changes in 2023 to how they planned for congestion and oversupply.
Curtailments can be necessary for grid operators to balance supply and demand. Curtailments occur either when generation exceeds electricity demand (oversupply) or when insufficient transfer capacity is available to transmit electricity over its preferred path to meet demand (congestion). Wind is curtailed before other resources in the Midwest because:
- It is cheaper and faster to both shut down and restart wind (and solar) plants than other types of generation.
- On very windy days in particular locations, transmission capacity is often insufficient to receive the large amount of wind power generated. READ MORE
Excerpt from Politico's Power Shift: Chuck Schumer. The Senate majority leader recently told me (Kelsey Brugger) that he would “like to get permitting reform done” this Congress. But objections from three Energy Committee Democrats — including Finance Chair Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) — and major environmental groups could prevent him from holding a Senate vote.
Wyden — a key architect of the climate law, the Inflation Reduction Act — objected to the bill’s fossil fuel provisions, including new requirements that the Interior Department lease land that the industry has nominated for oil and gas development.
Senate Republicans, too, have some complaints. For one, they objected on grounds of states rights. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) argued that corporations could run roughshod over farmland to build out power lines. Others said red-state electricity consumers could end up fronting the costs for the climate targets of neighboring blue states.
All those concerns could dissipate, given the support from Barrasso, a partisan who’s running uncontested for GOP whip.
The Republican-controlled House poses other threats. GOP lawmakers have objected to transmission legislation, which many continue to see as climate-y and a boon only for solar and wind energy projects.
However that could be changing: As electricity demand soars nationwide, there’s an effort by center-right groups like the R Street Institute to inform Republicans that transmission is merely about spreading electrons, regardless of fuel source.
Biden hesitation?
The White House, previously supportive of permitting legislation to unlock IRA potential, has been silent about this latest Manchin-Barrasso push.
Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, the likely Democratic presidential nominee, are eager to run on clean energy development and jobs in swing states. But they may hesitate to support the bill due to objections from environmentalists who argue that the legislation would be a boon to natural gas export projects and further marginalize minority and low-income communities long burdened by pollution.
The political calculations could change during the lame-duck session after the November election. If Democrats lose the White House, they would be eager to take what they can get to fortify the nation’s grid and green-light renewables. Republicans too might be keen to take a deal with clear oil and gas perks. READ MORE
Excerpt from Frederick News Post: During a tense, four-hour community meeting hosted by Frederick County Executive Jessica Fitzwater at Oakdale High School on Wednesday, representatives from PSEG said the company is “a little less than 10 days away” from releasing a preferred route for the project.
Fitzwater said on Wednesday that representatives of PJM were invited, but declined to participate in the community meeting.
In a letter to Fitzwater, PJM’s Senior Vice President of Governmental and Member Services Asim Haque wrote that, “While I can appreciate your positioning on MPRP, PJM is simply not staffed to attend each public hearing or meeting that is requested of us. For MPRP, those requests have been numerous.”
“While PJM is not able to attend your meeting,” Haque continued, “please be aware that PJM followed its federally approved process in selecting the MPRP project, holding a series of open meetings over most of 2023 to analyze, study, and discuss the grid’s regional transmission needs and the drivers behind them.”
PJM has previously said that the project is necessitated by the deactivation of 11,000 megawatts of power generation across its grid, combined with a projected increase in energy demand over the coming years.
In a January press release on its 2024 Load Forecast Report, PJM said the increase in demand for power is “increasingly driven by the development of data centers throughout the PJM footprint, combined with the accelerating electrification of transportation and industry.”
Finalizing a routeJim Gilroy, the manager of state affairs for PSEG, said the first notifications of the company’s preferred route would be mailed to impacted property owners.
Only after the company knows that all letters have been received will the route be made public, Gilroy said.
PSEG will then hold one public meeting each in Frederick, Carroll and Baltimore counties, through which the MPRP would run regardless of which proposed alignment is chosen. The meetings will take place in November.
Local officials including Fitzwater, the Frederick County Council and the state delegation for Frederick County have opposed each of the proposed MPRP alignments in comments to the Maryland Public Service Commission.
The PSC will ultimately be tasked with granting or choosing not to grant PSEG a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (CPCN) for the project.
PSEG has said it plans to apply for a CPCN by the end of 2024. There will be additional opportunities for public comment once the company’s application has been submitted.
Jason Kalwa, the director of the project, said PSEG plans to start approaching property owners in the path of its preferred route “very soon” to negotiate the acquisition of rights-of-way, stating that the company did not need to wait for the approval of the PSC.
In response to a question about how much money PSEG has budgeted for the acquisition of rights-of-way, Kalwa said he was “not prepared to discuss that,” but the amount would be allocated based on the preferred route. The entire project budget is $424 million.
“Regardless of what that budget is, we will negotiate directly with property owners,” Kalwa said. “I will tell you if the market value says a certain amount, that’s the floor for what we’re willing to pay.”
Only after obtaining the PSC’s approval would PSEG be considered a public utility with the ability to acquire rights-of-way through eminent domain, Gilroy said on Wednesday, adding that the company considers such takings a “last option.”
...
Comments from residents
Several of those who spoke at the meeting on Wednesday said they would refuse any offer from PSEG to acquire rights-of-way on their properties and encouraged others to do the same.
...
Lisa Gaver of Gaver Farm near New Market told the PSEG representatives that any appraisal of her property would not capture the financial impact of having power lines running over her agritourism operation.
“We’ve put 40 years into building up our farm and our reputation,” Gaver said. “Many of our customers are engaged, and they have told us specifically that this would be detrimental to their choice to visit our farm. ... I want you to tell me how you rectify that.”
Other audience members questioned whether any of their feedback would make a difference to PSEG in determining the final route for the project. READ MORE
Excerpt from Frederick News Post:
Amid a crowd of hundreds packed into the Brunswick Volunteer Fire Company on Thursday night to hear about a power-line proposal, Crystal Scholz asked everyone to join her in prayer before members of the Public Service Enterprise Group.
In her prayer, Scholz asked God to guide Gov. Wes Moore and elected officials; PSEG; and others to essentially stop development of the Maryland Piedmont Reliability Project (MPRP).
Scholz was one of the residents who went to the fire company to hear information about and protest against the MPRP, a planned transmission line that would cut across Frederick, Carroll and Baltimore counties.
Audience members were angry and concerned about the possibility that the project would mean private property would be taken from them, whether through easement negotiations or land being seized.
...
As part of developing the project, PSEG plans to apply to the Maryland Public Service Commission for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (CPCN) by the end of this year or the beginning of 2025.
...
In the five months since PSEG first announced its intent to develop the MPRP in June, residents across all three counties the project would be built in have questioned its necessity and pushed back against it.
That opposition has only grown.
Some opponents have formed Stop MPRP, a nonprofit group, in response to the project.
Multiple county, state and federal officials, including Frederick County Executive Jessica Fitzwater and the County Council, have voiced their opposition.
At previous public forums about the MPRP, residents have made emotional pleas and angrily demanded PSEG stop the MPRP, claiming the company doesn't care how Marylanders will be affected.
The set of public information sessions PSEG hosted this week — one in each of the three counties where the MPRP would be — were no different.
Questions about necessity, eminent domain
At the Brunswick Volunteer Fire Company, PSEG attempted to present information on the MPRP before answering questions from the audience.
Kalwa explained that PJM anticipates an increase in power demand due to more electrification — such as more electric vehicles and HVAC systems — as well as the continued development of data centers.
He said the retirement of power generation sources — such as coal-fired plants — is outpacing the demand for power. Additionally, Maryland imports about 40% of its energy needs, meaning the state relies more on the regional PJM grid to bring in power, according to Kalwa.
During the presentation, attendees interrupted Kalwa and shouted at the PSEG panel, demanding to know how the MPRP would benefit Marylanders and saying the project would only benefit data centers in Loudoun County, Virginia.
This certificate allows someone to construct a new generating station or high-voltage transmission lines.
...
In Maryland, counties, municipalities and utilities can only use eminent domain if Maryland has legally delegated that power to them, according to the Owners' Counsel of America.
...
PSEG stopped the presentation partway through due to attendees' demands that the panel listen to their questions and statements.
'I will fight you tooth and nail'
The dozens of people who spoke during the Q&A portion of Thursday night's event all opposed the MPRP.
...
Lisa Gaver, co-owner of Gaver Family Farm, told PSEG that the MPRP would devastate her family's agritourism business.
...
Gaver also said there would be insurance impacts and safety concerns. She said the broker handling the farm's policies told her if the MPRP is built, the farm's insurance would be more expensive if they could even find coverage.
"We cannot take the safety risk of putting hundreds and hundreds and thousands and thousands of people through our 40-acre field constantly under these power lines," Gaver said. READ MORE
Excerpt from Frederick News Post:
Maryland Gov. Wes Moore released a statement on Friday expressing “grave concerns” with the planning process for the Maryland Piedmont Reliability Project and vowing to request a meeting with the companies behind the proposed 500,000-volt transmission line.
Moore’s statement comes the week after New-Jersey-based developer Public Service Enterprise Group (PSEG) held a series of meetings in each of the three Maryland counties that would be impacted by the transmission line about its preferred route.
In Frederick County, the preferred route runs through the southeastern and southern parts of Frederick County near New Market and Ijamsville toward Buckeystown and Adamstown, ending at the Doubs substation.
Many landowners in the path for the MPRP have fiercely opposed the project, arguing that the transmission line would hamper agricultural operations and potentially lead to the seizure of land through eminent domain.
Representatives of PSEG have countered that PJM Interconnection, a regional transmission organization, sanctioned the MPRP as a solution to projected energy shortfalls in the region. The company has said eminent domain would be a tool of last resort.
In his statement on Friday, Moore wrote that he had “grave concerns” about “how the study area for this project was determined, the lack of community involvement in the planning process, and the lack of effective communication about the impacts of this project.”
“The single most important factor remains wholly unclear: the project’s comprehensive benefit to Marylanders,” the statement read.
Moore voiced support for ensuring reliability of the state’s power grid, but wrote that “the approach must be one that puts people first.”
...
Elected officials at the local, state and federal levels — including the state delegation for Frederick County, and U.S. Sens. Chris Van Hollen and Ben Cardin — have expressed reservations about the project in public statements.
The Frederick County Council and Frederick County Executive Jessica Fitzwater have sent multiple letters to leaders at PSEG and the Maryland Public Service Commission, the agency that will eventually review the project for approval.
The most recent letter from Frederick County officials, dated Nov. 18, invited members of the PSC to come to Frederick County and hear directly from residents who would be impacted by the transmission line.
“It is clear that our residents continue to have good reasons to oppose the project,” the letter read in part. “We stand ready to assist you with any logistics related to a public meeting.” READ MORE
More than 50,000 articles in our online library!
Use the categories and tags listed below to access the nearly 50,000 articles indexed on this website.
Advanced Biofuels USA Policy Statements and Handouts!
- For Kids: Carbon Cycle Puzzle Page
- Why Ethanol? Why E85?
- Just A Minute 3-5 Minute Educational Videos
- 30/30 Online Presentations
- “Disappearing” Carbon Tax for Non-Renewable Fuels
- What’s the Difference between Biodiesel and Renewable (Green) Diesel? 2020 revision
- How to De-Fossilize Your Fleet: Suggestions for Fleet Managers Working on Sustainability Programs
- New Engine Technologies Could Produce Similar Mileage for All Ethanol Fuel Mixtures
- Action Plan for a Sustainable Advanced Biofuel Economy
- The Interaction of the Clean Air Act, California’s CAA Waiver, Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards, Renewable Fuel Standards and California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard
- Latest Data on Fuel Mileage and GHG Benefits of E30
- What Can I Do?
Donate
DonateARCHIVES
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- June 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- October 2006
- April 2006
- January 2006
- April 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- December 1987
CATEGORIES
- About Us
- Advanced Biofuels Call to Action
- Aviation Fuel/Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF)
- BioChemicals/Renewable Chemicals
- BioRefineries/Renewable Fuel Production
- Business News/Analysis
- Cooking Fuel
- Education
- 30/30 Online Presentations
- Competitions, Contests
- Earth Day 2021
- Earth Day 2022
- Earth Day 2023
- Earth Day 2024
- Executive Training
- Featured Study Programs
- Instagram TikTok Short Videos
- Internships
- Just a Minute
- K-12 Activities
- Mechanics training
- Online Courses
- Podcasts
- Scholarships/Fellowships
- Teacher Resources
- Technical Training
- Technician Training
- University/College Programs
- Events
- Coming Events
- Completed Events
- More Coming Events
- Requests for Speakers, Presentations, Posters
- Requests for Speakers, Presentations, Posters Completed
- Webinars/Online
- Webinars/Online Completed; often available on-demand
- Federal Agency/Executive Branch
- Agency for International Development (USAID)
- Agriculture (USDA)
- Commerce Department
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission
- Congressional Budget Office
- Defense (DOD)
- Air Force
- Army
- DARPA (Defense Advance Research Projects Agency)
- Defense Logistics Agency
- Marines
- Navy
- Education Department
- Energy (DOE)
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
- Federal Reserve System
- Federal Trade Commission
- Food and Drug Administration
- General Services Administration
- Government Accountability Office (GAO)
- Health and Human Services (HHS)
- Homeland Security
- Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
- Interior Department
- International Trade Commission
- Joint Office of Energy and Transportation
- Justice (DOJ)
- Labor Department
- National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- National Research Council
- National Science Foundation
- National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Overseas Private Investment Corporation
- Patent and Trademark Office
- Securities and Exchange Commission
- State Department
- Surface Transportation Board
- Transportation (DOT)
- Federal Aviation Administration
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
- Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Admin (PHMSA)
- Treasury Department
- U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)
- White House
- Federal Legislation
- Federal Litigation
- Federal Regulation
- Feedstocks
- Agriculture/Food Processing Residues nonfield crop
- Alcohol/Ethanol/Isobutanol
- Algae/Other Aquatic Organisms/Seaweed
- Atmosphere
- Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
- Field/Orchard/Plantation Crops/Residues
- Forestry/Wood/Residues/Waste
- hydrogen
- Manure
- Methane/Biogas
- methanol/bio-/renewable methanol
- Not Agriculture
- RFNBO (Renewable Fuels of Non-Biological Origin)
- Seawater
- Sugars
- water
- Funding/Financing/Investing
- grants
- Green Jobs
- Green Racing
- Health Concerns/Benefits
- Heating Oil/Fuel
- History of Advanced Biofuels
- Infrastructure
- Aggregation
- Biofuels Engine Design
- Biorefinery/Fuel Production Infrastructure
- Carbon Capture/Storage/Use
- certification
- Deliver Dispense
- Farming/Growing
- Precursors/Biointermediates
- Preprocessing
- Pretreatment
- Terminals Transport Pipelines
- International
- Abu Dhabi
- Afghanistan
- Africa
- Albania
- Algeria
- Angola
- Antarctica
- Argentina
- Armenia
- Aruba
- Asia
- Asia Pacific
- Australia
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
- Bahamas
- Bahrain
- Bangladesh
- Barbados
- Belarus
- Belgium
- Belize
- Benin
- Bermuda
- Bhutan
- Bolivia
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Botswana
- Brazil
- Brunei
- Bulgaria
- Burkina Faso
- Burundi
- Cambodia
- Cameroon
- Canada
- Caribbean
- Central African Republic
- Central America
- Chad
- Chile
- China
- Colombia
- Congo, Democratic Republic of
- Costa Rica
- Croatia
- Cuba
- Cyprus
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Dominican Republic
- Dubai
- Ecuador
- El Salvador
- Equatorial Guinea
- Eqypt
- Estonia
- Ethiopia
- European Union (EU)
- Fiji
- Finland
- France
- French Guiana
- Gabon
- Georgia
- Germany
- Ghana
- Global South
- Greece
- Greenland
- Guatemala
- Guinea
- Guyana
- Haiti
- Honduras
- Hong Kong
- Hungary
- Iceland
- India
- Indonesia
- Iran
- Iraq
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Ivory Coast
- Jamaica
- Japan
- Jersey
- Jordan
- Kazakhstan
- Kenya
- Korea
- Kosovo
- Kuwait
- Laos
- Latin America
- Latvia
- Lebanon
- Liberia
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Macedonia
- Madagascar
- Malawi
- Malaysia
- Maldives
- Mali
- Malta
- Marshall Islands
- Mauritania
- Mauritius
- Mexico
- Middle East
- Monaco
- Mongolia
- Morocco
- Mozambique
- Myanmar/Burma
- Namibia
- Nepal
- Netherlands
- New Guinea
- New Zealand
- Nicaragua
- Niger
- Nigeria
- North Africa
- North Korea
- Northern Ireland
- Norway
- Oman
- Pakistan
- Panama
- Papua New Guinea
- Paraguay
- Peru
- Philippines
- Poland
- Portugal
- Qatar
- Romania
- Russia
- Rwanda
- Saudi Arabia
- Scotland
- Senegal
- Serbia
- Sierra Leone
- Singapore
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Solomon Islands
- South Africa
- South America
- South Korea
- South Sudan
- Southeast Asia
- Spain
- Sri Lanka
- Sudan
- Suriname
- Swaziland
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Taiwan
- Tanzania
- Thailand
- Timor-Leste
- Togo
- Trinidad and Tobago
- Tunisia
- Turkey
- Uganda
- UK (United Kingdom)
- Ukraine
- United Arab Emirates UAE
- Uruguay
- Uzbekistan
- Vatican
- Venezuela
- Vietnam
- Wales
- Zambia
- Zanzibar
- Zimbabwe
- Marine/Boat Bio and Renewable Fuel/MGO/MDO/SMF
- Marketing/Market Forces and Sales
- Opinions
- Organizations
- Original Writing, Opinions Advanced Biofuels USA
- Policy
- Presentations
- Biofuels Digest Conferences
- DOE Conferences
- Bioeconomy 2017
- Bioenergy2015
- Biomass2008
- Biomass2009
- Biomass2010
- Biomass2011
- Biomass2012
- Biomass2013
- Biomass2014
- DOE Project Peer Review
- Other Conferences/Events
- R & D Focus
- Carbon Capture/Storage/Use
- Co-Products
- Feedstock
- Logistics
- Performance
- Process
- Vehicle/Engine/Motor/Aircraft/Boiler
- Yeast
- Railroad/Train/Locomotive Fuel
- Resources
- Books Web Sites etc
- Business
- Definition of Advanced Biofuels
- Find Stuff
- Government Resources
- Scientific Resources
- Technical Resources
- Tools/Decision-Making
- Rocket/Missile Fuel
- Sponsors
- States
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawai'i
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Midwest
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Native American tribal nation lands
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Puerto Rico
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- Washington DC
- West Coast
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- Sustainability
- Uncategorized
- What You Can Do
tags
© 2008-2023 Copyright Advanced BioFuels USA. All Rights reserved.
Comments are closed.