Advanced BioFuels USA

by Drew T. Shindell, Yunha Lee & Greg Faluvegi (Nature Climate Change)  An emissions trajectory for the US consistent with 2 °C warming would require marked societal changes, making it crucial to understand the associated benefits. Previous studies have examined technological potentials and implementation costs^{1, 2} and public health benefits have been quantified for less-aggressive potential emissions-reduction policies (for example, refs 3,4), but researchers have not yet fully explored the multiple benefits of reductions consistent with 2 °C. We examine the impacts of such highly ambitious scenarios for clean energy and vehicles. US transportation emissions reductions avoid ~0.03 °C global warming in 2030 (0.15 °C in 2100), whereas energy emissions reductions avoid ~0.05–0.07 °C 2030 warming (~0.25 °C in 2100). Nationally, however, clean energy policies produce climate disbenefits including warmer summers (although these would be eliminated by the remote effects of similar policies if they were undertaken elsewhere). The policies also greatly reduce damaging ambient particulate matter and ozone. By 2030, clean energy policies could prevent ~175,000 premature deaths, with ~22,000 (11,000–96,000; 95% confidence) fewer annually thereafter, whereas clean transportation could prevent ~120,000 premature deaths and ~14,000 (9,000–52,000) annually thereafter. Near-term national benefits are valued at ~US$250 billion (140 billion to 1,050 billion) per year, which is likely to exceed implementation costs. Including longer-term, worldwide climate impacts, benefits roughly quintuple, becoming ~5–10 times larger than estimated implementation costs. Achieving the benefits, however, would require both larger and broader emissions reductions than those in current legislation or regulations. READ MORE and MORE (Huffington Post)

Excerpt from Huffington Post:  “We would need enormous national will to change the way we get energy and provide transportation services,” he (Drew Shindell, professor of climate sciences at Duke and lead author of the study) said. “But it could really be done if we wanted to do this.”

In the long run, the advantages of moving away from fossil fuels outweigh the costs, according to Cleetus (Rachel Cleetus, lead economist and climate policy manager at the Union of Concerned Scientists, who was not involved in the study). That’s because while fossil fuels appear cheap, they contain what Cleetus calls “disguised costs.”

“When we do a true calculation for public health costs, we realize it’s a different equation,” Cleetus said. “The cost of clean energy transition starts to pale compared to the benefits.”  READ MORE