We are not accepting donations from people or companies in Florida due to unfair reporting requirements and fees not imposed by any other state.

Call to Action for a Truly Sustainable Renewable Future
August 8, 2013 – 5:07 pm | No Comment

-Include high octane/high ethanol Regular Grade fuel in EPA Tier 3 regulations.
-Use a dedicated, self-reducing non-renewable carbon user fee to fund renewable energy R&D.
-Start an Apollo-type program to bring New Ideas to sustainable biofuel and …

Read the full story »
Business News/Analysis

Federal Legislation

Political news and views from Capitol Hill.

More Coming Events

Conferences and Events List in Addition to Coming Events Carousel (above)

Original Writing, Opinions Advanced Biofuels USA


Home » Feedstocks, Forestry/Wood, Norway, Opinions, Policy, Sustainability

Biofuel May Backfire as a Budget Bluff

Submitted by on March 13, 2017 – 3:20 pmNo Comment

(NewsInEnglish.no)  Plans by the Norwegian government to mandate usage of much more biofuel, as another so-called “green” measure that helped secure last year’s state budget compromise, may end up backfiring as little more than a budget bluff. New statistics suggest that more production and consumption of biofuel may actually raise carbon emissions instead of lowering them, and at another huge cost to motorists.

Newspapers Aftenposten, Bergens Tidende, Adressa, Stavanger Aftenblad and Fædrelandsvennen jointly asked Norway’s state statistics bureau SSB (Statistics Norway) to calculate the actual climate effects of the last compromise on the state budget. After quarreling for months, the Conservatives and the Progress Party finally reached agreement on the budget with their government coalition’s support parties, the Liberals and Christian Democrats.

The key to the compromise, reported Aftenposten and the other newspapers on Wednesday, was a demand that 512 million liters of biofuel must annually be blended into all gasoline and diesel fuel sold in Norway by 2020. That means that 20 percent of all fuel used in vehicles driving on Norwegian roads will be biofuel, made from plants and, in Norway, refuse and byproducts from the country’s forestry industry.

The main problem with biofuel, according to EU officials who’ve been arguing over biofuel as well, is that its production can thin the forests and drain the marshes that otherwise can capture and store carbon emissions. Cutting trees down for biofuel can, estimate experts, actually result in more emissions, not less. SSB calculated that given the quantities of biofuel that the government wants to produce and use by 2020, Norway would register a rise in carbon emissions of 90,000 tons, equivalent to 29,000 more cars on the road.

Motorists, moreover, would be forced to finance the production and consumption of biofuel, at a time when they’re already being hit by higher fuel taxes, higher road tolls and probably even a new tax on vehicles themselves in Oslo, as officials try to discourage driving as best they can.

The government, meanwhile, claims the use of “advanced biofuel” in Norway based on the twigs, scraps and other refuse of forest industry activity, would be positive for the climate accounts. Vidar Helgesen, the government minister in charge of climate and environmental issues for the Conservatives, believes it’s most important if biofuel can reduce carbon emissions globally.

The Nortransport boss said he’ll feel cheated if the biofuel actually contributes to more carbon emissions instead of less.  READ MORE

Related Post

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments are closed.