by Carlos Anchondo (Politico Pro Energywire) Advocates say a failure to act would imperil the technology's adoption. -- A contingent of carbon capture and storage proponents is urging Congress to tweak a tax credit essential to greater project deployment.
In a letter Monday, more than 50 unions, conservation groups and energy companies called on congressional leadership to include a “targeted suite of small-scale adjustments” to the federal 45Q tax credit in any forthcoming legislative package.
Failing to address “remaining small-scale gaps in federal policy” could hinder deployment of carbon capture and removal technologies, “imperiling” jobs, economic development, energy security and “the prospect of urgently needed — and achievable — greenhouse gas emissions reductions,” the letter said.
Signatories include agribusiness company Archer-Daniels-Midland; a subsidiary of oil and gas company Occidental Petroleum; the National Wildlife Federation; CO2 pipeline developer Summit Carbon Solutions; and the Carbon Capture Coalition, a pro-CCS group with more than 100 members.
The letter, which touted bipartisan support for carbon capture and removal technologies, said “pragmatic adjustments” could further expand U.S. leadership in the sector. READ MORE
December 11, 2023
Dear Speaker Johnson, Leader Schumer, Leader Jeffries and Leader McConnell:
On behalf of the undersigned, thank you for your continued commitment to expand and accelerate the responsible deployment of carbon management technologies to provide reliable American energy, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, create and retain jobs that families and local economies depend upon, and spur investment in domestic energy, industry and manufacturing sectors. As you consider end of the year legislative proposals including taxbased policies, we urge you to prioritize a targeted suite of small-scale adjustments to the federal Section 45Q tax credit as an essential component of any forthcoming legislative package.
The 117th Congress enacted a suite of essential, widely supported enhancements to the federal Section 45Q tax credit, the foundational policy mechanism to incentivize the deployment of carbon management projects. These measures, coupled with the incremental enactment of additional supportive policies over the course of the past several years, underscores Congress’ commitment to enabling carbon management projects to fulfill their emissions reduction and job creation potential. That said, remaining small-scale gaps in federal policy threaten to impede the economywide deployment of these technologies – imperiling American jobs, economic development, energy security and the prospect of urgently needed – and achievable – greenhouse gas emissions reductions.
Thanks to robust and sustained bipartisan congressional support, the United States now provides the most forwardlooking policies in the world for the deployment of carbon management technologies and many organizations stand ready to act. However, there is still work to be done to ensure the historic investments made in carbon management over the past several years translate to widescale project deployment. Congress now has the immediate opportunity to provide a set of targeted, pragmatic adjustments to the 45Q tax credit to underpin and grow the role of American leadership in the development and deployment of these technologies throughout the remainder of this crucial decade of deployment and beyond, including:
• Indexing 45Q for inflation immediately: Increased credit values provided to projects developed in the industry, power and direct air capture sectors are the cornerstone of the recent enhancements made to the 45Q program in 2022. However, unlike other low- and zero-emissions technology tax credits recently reformed or created by the 117th Congress, the 45Q tax credit value is not adjusted for inflation until 2027. Already, much of the value increase realized in recent 45Q enhancements has been eroded due to significant inflation in both capital goods costs and energy price increases. To prevent further reduction of the credit value in today’s dollars, 45Q should be adjusted for inflation immediately.
• Creating parity between carbon utilization credit levels and those associated with geologic storage: Under the current statute, there is a $25 per ton disparity between those projects that reuse carbon emissions to manufacture valuable products versus those that securely and permanently store the captured carbon. This disparity effectively disincentivizes the development and deployment of relatively nascent carbon reuse technologies. This disparity rises to $50 per ton in relation to direct air capture projects. Removing policy barriers like the credit level disparity between carbon reuse and geologic storage in 45Q is a critical factor in boosting the availability of carbon feedstocks for reuse applications across the value chain of carbon-based commodities, specialty products, and chemicals. 2
As you consider the inclusion of tax-based policies in upcoming bipartisan legislation, there remains broad support among lawmakers and external partners to ensure these technologies can scale at the rate necessary to provide tangible emissions reductions and climate benefits, while securing American energy reliability and technology leadership. We stand ready to work with you to advance necessary policies to catalyze the deployment of carbon management and broader clean energy technologies included as part of an end of the year package or in another moving legislative vehicle this Congress. Should you have any questions about the outlined provisions noted in this letter, please contact Madelyn Morrison, Director of Government Affairs, Carbon Capture Coalition at mmorrison@carboncapturecoalition.org.
Sincerely,
Carbon Capture Coalition
8 Rivers Capital, LLC
Aircapture
ADM
Baker Hughes
BASF
Biomass Power Association
Blue Planet Systems
Braemar Energy Ventures
Capital Power Carbon America
Carbon To Stone, Inc.
CarbonCap Holdings LLC
CarbonCapture Inc.
CarbonCure
CarbonFree Chemicals
Carbonova Corp.
CarbonQuest
Cemvita
Center for Climate and Energy Solutions
CERT Systems
Chart Industries
Clean Air Task Force
ClearPath Action 3
Dioxycle
Equinor
Fortera
Fortistar
GE Vernova
Glenrock Energy
Green Plains Inc.
Growth Energy
Heirloom Holcim US
Husky Partners, LLC
International Brotherhood of Boilermakers
LanzaJet
LanzaTech, Inc.
Lapis Energy
Lydian
Melzer CO2Consulting
Methanex
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries America
National Wildlife Federation
NET Power
Oxy Low Carbon Ventures
Pennsylvania Environmental Council
Portland Cement Association
Quartz Energy Partners LLC
Renewable Fuels Association
Republic Services
Summit Carbon Solutions
Svante
United Airlines
United Steelworkers
Related articles
- The US Could Remove 1 Billion Tons of Carbon From the Air — for $130 Billion: The US has the tools to help clean up the atmosphere, but it lacks the infrastructure to do it at scale. A new report lays out the costs and a roadmap. (Bloomberg)
- Just How Much Money Do CO2 Pipeline Companies Stand to Make From the Inflation Reduction Act? (Inside Climate News)
- IRS urged to bolster oversight of CCS tax credit -- Critics of a key federal incentive for carbon capture and storage called on the tax agency to make changes. (Politico Pro Energywire)
Excerpts from Inside Climate News: By getting more carbon dioxide under contract, the expansion would help Summit’s financial case and, critically, would open up billions of dollars in additional tax credits, without which the project would never be built. If the pipeline is built and operates at full capacity, Summit and its partners could be eligible for as much as $18 billion in federal tax benefits over 12 years. In reality, the pipeline is unlikely to get that full amount, experts say, but it could still reap many billions, potentially enough to cover most or even all of its construction and operating costs.
...
Given the sustained resistance that Summit has faced, and the project’s high costs—an estimated $8 billion for construction—the generous federal tax credit could help explain why the company is expanding its scope, rather than retreating.
Daniel Cohan, an associate professor of civil and environmental engineering at Rice University, said the scale of Summit’s potential tax benefit is unprecedented and far exceeds what any single wind or solar project would get, for example. But, he said, that might be the point.
“The government is trying to kickstart technologies that have only rarely been used,” Cohan said. “Agree with it or not, the logic of these carbon capture tax credits is to make them especially generous at first with the hope that they can be scaled back as carbon capture becomes more widespread in the future.”
The benefits are particularly large for ethanol plants, which produce a near-pure stream of carbon dioxide and are therefore among the cheapest carbon capture operations. READ MORE
Excerpt from Politico Pro Energywire:
Environmental groups and taxpayer watchdogs are pushing the head of the IRS to boost oversight and transparency of one of the carbon capture industry’s top incentives: the 45Q tax credit.
The Treasury Department agency should “implement strong oversight and transparency rules” to ensure that public dollars aren’t wasted as companies claim the credit, more than two dozen people said in a letter to IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel.
The 45Q credit — created in 2008 and expanded most recently with the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act — can be claimed by companies that store carbon dioxide in geologic formations or reuse the climate-warming gas to produce fuels, building materials and other products.
People listed as signing the letter sent Monday included representatives from the Environmental Health Project, Taxpayers for Common Sense and Robert Bullard, a professor of urban planning and environmental policy at Texas Southern University. POLITICO’s Morning Energy newsletter reported on the letter Monday (May 13, 2024). READ MORE
More than 50,000 articles in our online library!
Use the categories and tags listed below to access the nearly 50,000 articles indexed on this website.
Advanced Biofuels USA Policy Statements and Handouts!
- For Kids: Carbon Cycle Puzzle Page
- Why Ethanol? Why E85?
- Just A Minute 3-5 Minute Educational Videos
- 30/30 Online Presentations
- “Disappearing” Carbon Tax for Non-Renewable Fuels
- What’s the Difference between Biodiesel and Renewable (Green) Diesel? 2020 revision
- How to De-Fossilize Your Fleet: Suggestions for Fleet Managers Working on Sustainability Programs
- New Engine Technologies Could Produce Similar Mileage for All Ethanol Fuel Mixtures
- Action Plan for a Sustainable Advanced Biofuel Economy
- The Interaction of the Clean Air Act, California’s CAA Waiver, Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards, Renewable Fuel Standards and California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard
- Latest Data on Fuel Mileage and GHG Benefits of E30
- What Can I Do?
Donate
DonateARCHIVES
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- June 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- October 2006
- April 2006
- January 2006
- April 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- December 1987
CATEGORIES
- About Us
- Advanced Biofuels Call to Action
- Aviation Fuel/Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF)
- BioChemicals/Renewable Chemicals
- BioRefineries/Renewable Fuel Production
- Business News/Analysis
- Cooking Fuel
- Education
- 30/30 Online Presentations
- Competitions, Contests
- Earth Day 2021
- Earth Day 2022
- Earth Day 2023
- Earth Day 2024
- Executive Training
- Featured Study Programs
- Instagram TikTok Short Videos
- Internships
- Just a Minute
- K-12 Activities
- Mechanics training
- Online Courses
- Podcasts
- Scholarships/Fellowships
- Teacher Resources
- Technical Training
- Technician Training
- University/College Programs
- Events
- Coming Events
- Completed Events
- More Coming Events
- Requests for Speakers, Presentations, Posters
- Requests for Speakers, Presentations, Posters Completed
- Webinars/Online
- Webinars/Online Completed; often available on-demand
- Federal Agency/Executive Branch
- Agency for International Development (USAID)
- Agriculture (USDA)
- Commerce Department
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission
- Congressional Budget Office
- Defense (DOD)
- Air Force
- Army
- DARPA (Defense Advance Research Projects Agency)
- Defense Logistics Agency
- Marines
- Navy
- Education Department
- Energy (DOE)
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
- Federal Reserve System
- Federal Trade Commission
- Food and Drug Administration
- General Services Administration
- Government Accountability Office (GAO)
- Health and Human Services (HHS)
- Homeland Security
- Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
- Interior Department
- International Trade Commission
- Joint Office of Energy and Transportation
- Justice (DOJ)
- Labor Department
- National Academy of Sciences
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- National Research Council
- National Science Foundation
- National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Overseas Private Investment Corporation
- Patent and Trademark Office
- Securities and Exchange Commission
- State Department
- Surface Transportation Board
- Transportation (DOT)
- Federal Aviation Administration
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
- Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Admin (PHMSA)
- Treasury Department
- U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)
- White House
- Federal Legislation
- Federal Litigation
- Federal Regulation
- Feedstocks
- Agriculture/Food Processing Residues nonfield crop
- Alcohol/Ethanol/Isobutanol
- Algae/Other Aquatic Organisms/Seaweed
- Atmosphere
- Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
- Field/Orchard/Plantation Crops/Residues
- Forestry/Wood/Residues/Waste
- hydrogen
- Manure
- Methane/Biogas
- methanol/bio-/renewable methanol
- Not Agriculture
- RFNBO (Renewable Fuels of Non-Biological Origin)
- Seawater
- Sugars
- water
- Funding/Financing/Investing
- grants
- Green Jobs
- Green Racing
- Health Concerns/Benefits
- Heating Oil/Fuel
- History of Advanced Biofuels
- Infrastructure
- Aggregation
- Biofuels Engine Design
- Biorefinery/Fuel Production Infrastructure
- Carbon Capture/Storage/Use
- certification
- Deliver Dispense
- Farming/Growing
- Precursors/Biointermediates
- Preprocessing
- Pretreatment
- Terminals Transport Pipelines
- International
- Abu Dhabi
- Afghanistan
- Africa
- Albania
- Algeria
- Angola
- Antarctica
- Argentina
- Armenia
- Aruba
- Asia
- Asia Pacific
- Australia
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
- Bahamas
- Bahrain
- Bangladesh
- Barbados
- Belarus
- Belgium
- Beliz
- Benin
- Bermuda
- Bhutan
- Bolivia
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Botswana
- Brazil
- Brunei
- Bulgaria
- Burkina Faso
- Burundi
- Cambodia
- Cameroon
- Canada
- Caribbean
- Central African Republic
- Central America
- Chad
- Chile
- China
- Colombia
- Congo, Democratic Republic of
- Costa Rica
- Croatia
- Cuba
- Cyprus
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Dominican Republic
- Dubai
- Ecuador
- El Salvador
- Equatorial Guinea
- Eqypt
- Estonia
- Ethiopia
- European Union (EU)
- Fiji
- Finland
- France
- French Guiana
- Gabon
- Georgia
- Germany
- Ghana
- Global South
- Greece
- Greenland
- Guatemala
- Guinea
- Guyana
- Haiti
- Honduras
- Hong Kong
- Hungary
- Iceland
- India
- Indonesia
- Iran
- Iraq
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Ivory Coast
- Jamaica
- Japan
- Jersey
- Jordan
- Kazakhstan
- Kenya
- Korea
- Kosovo
- Kuwait
- Laos
- Latin America
- Latvia
- Lebanon
- Liberia
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Macedonia
- Madagascar
- Malawi
- Malaysia
- Maldives
- Mali
- Malta
- Marshall Islands
- Mauritania
- Mauritius
- Mexico
- Middle East
- Monaco
- Mongolia
- Morocco
- Mozambique
- Myanmar/Burma
- Namibia
- Nepal
- Netherlands
- New Guinea
- New Zealand
- Nicaragua
- Niger
- Nigeria
- North Africa
- North Korea
- Northern Ireland
- Norway
- Oman
- Pakistan
- Panama
- Papua New Guinea
- Paraguay
- Peru
- Philippines
- Poland
- Portugal
- Qatar
- Romania
- Russia
- Rwanda
- Saudi Arabia
- Scotland
- Senegal
- Serbia
- Sierra Leone
- Singapore
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Solomon Islands
- South Africa
- South America
- South Korea
- South Sudan
- Southeast Asia
- Spain
- Sri Lanka
- Sudan
- Suriname
- Swaziland
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Taiwan
- Tanzania
- Thailand
- Timor-Leste
- Togo
- Trinidad and Tobago
- Tunisia
- Turkey
- Uganda
- UK (United Kingdom)
- Ukraine
- United Arab Emirates UAE
- Uruguay
- Uzbekistan
- Vatican
- Venezuela
- Vietnam
- Wales
- Zambia
- Zanzibar
- Zimbabwe
- Marine/Boat Bio and Renewable Fuel/MGO/MDO/SMF
- Marketing/Market Forces and Sales
- Opinions
- Organizations
- Original Writing, Opinions Advanced Biofuels USA
- Policy
- Presentations
- Biofuels Digest Conferences
- DOE Conferences
- Bioeconomy 2017
- Bioenergy2015
- Biomass2008
- Biomass2009
- Biomass2010
- Biomass2011
- Biomass2012
- Biomass2013
- Biomass2014
- DOE Project Peer Review
- Other Conferences/Events
- R & D Focus
- Carbon Capture/Storage/Use
- Co-Products
- Feedstock
- Logistics
- Performance
- Process
- Vehicle/Engine/Motor/Aircraft/Boiler
- Yeast
- Railroad/Train/Locomotive Fuel
- Resources
- Books Web Sites etc
- Business
- Definition of Advanced Biofuels
- Find Stuff
- Government Resources
- Scientific Resources
- Technical Resources
- Tools/Decision-Making
- Rocket/Missile Fuel
- Sponsors
- States
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawai'i
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Midwest
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Native American tribal nation lands
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Puerto Rico
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- Washington DC
- West Coast
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- Sustainability
- Uncategorized
- What You Can Do
tags
© 2008-2023 Copyright Advanced BioFuels USA. All Rights reserved.
Comments are closed.