by Alex Nieves (Politico Pro Climatewire) The new Public Policy Institute of California survey comes amid questions about electric vehicle affordability in the absence of federal rebates. -- A growing number of Democrats oppose California’s plan to ban sales of new gas-powered cars starting in 2035, according to a new Public Policy Institute of California poll.
What happened: Two-thirds of the registered voters surveyed in the nonpartisan think tank’s July poll on environmental policy said they oppose Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom’s 2020 executive order that aims to phase out new gas and diesel vehicle sales over the next decade.
While that figure largely tracks with previous PPIC polling on the issue, the most notable shift in opinion emerged among liberals.
Half of the 611 Democrats surveyed said they oppose the ban, while 49 percent indicated they support it. PPIC’s July 2025 poll found that 55 percent of registered Democrats supported the gas-car ban, while 44 percent opposed the policy goal.
Why it matters: The 12-point swing comes as California leaders attempt to chart a path forward for electric vehicle adoption amid unrelenting attacks from the Trump administration. READ MORE
Related articles
- PPIC Statewide Survey: Californians and the Environment (Public Policy Institute of California)
-
CA voters still care about the environment, but affordability concerns are rising, poll says (Sacramento Bee)
-
Californians hate Gavin Newsom’s gas vehicle ban, poll shows (New York Post/Yahoo! News; includes VIDEO)
Excerpt from Public Policy Institute of California: This year marks the twin anniversaries of landmark legislation that has shaped the state’s environmental policies: the California Coastal Act of 1976 and the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. Today, California’s longstanding commitments to protecting its coastal waters and reducing greenhouse gas emissions are sharply at odds with federal policy shifts that now call for more oil drilling off the coast and reversing course on renewable energy programs. Today, the state government is also seeking to address the public’s concerns about the affordability and equity of its environmental policies.
These are the key findings of the Californians and the Environment survey on topics including the November election and approval ratings; the environment, economy, and technology; climate change and energy; and oceans, coast, and marine life that was conducted June 29–July 6, 2026:
...
- Californians are most likely to name wildfires as the top environmental issue facing the state today, followed by climate change, government overregulation, and water supply. About six in ten think that the state and local governments are not doing enough to address wildfires. A majority believe that stricter environmental laws and regulations in California are worth the cost, while partisans are deeply divided. Two in three adults oppose the governor’s executive order banning the sale of all new gasoline-powered vehicles by 2035, while one in three say that they have seriously considered an electric vehicle the next time they buy or lease a vehicle. Majorities oppose construction of data centers in their area and worry about the environmental impact of building more AI data centers.
- Seventy-five percent of Californians think that the Global Solutions Act of 2006 that required California to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions has been mostly a good thing for California. Majorities of adults believe that the effects of climate change have already begun, and that they pose a serious threat to the economy and quality of life of California’s future. Fifty percent say that they are very concerned that home insurance will become more expensive due to climate change risks. About two in three favor the state government making its own policies separate from the federal government on climate change. Six in ten favor requiring that all electricity come from renewable energy by 2045, while six in ten are not willing to pay more for renewable energy.
- ...
- Majorities of adults (55%) and likely voters (57%) believe that stricter environmental regulations in California are worth the cost, while 43 percent of both adults and likely voters say these regulations cost too many jobs and hurt the economy. Majorities across regions and most demographic groups support stricter environmental regulations despite their economic costs, although opinions differ sharply by party. About three in four Republicans say environmental regulations hurt the economy, while eight in ten Democrats say they are worth the cost and independents are split.
- ...
-
Californians have somewhat mixed views about electric vehicles. Forty-five percent say they have either seriously considered purchasing (33%) or already own (12%) an electric vehicle, while 54 percent say they have not considered purchasing one. The share who say they have not considered purchasing an electric vehicle has increased since July 2023, when 41 percent reported that they had not considered doing so. Views vary across regions and demographic groups, with Republicans (70%), those with a high school diploma or less (68%), and Latinos (61%) among the most likely to have not considered purchasing an electric vehicle. Residents earning more than $100,000 annually are far more likely than those earning less to have either purchased or seriously considered purchasing an electric vehicle.
Only one in five Californians are extremely (5%) or very (15%) confident that the state will build sufficient infrastructure to support large numbers of electric vehicles on the roads; about a third (32%) are somewhat confident and nearly half are not too (24%) or not at all (22%) confident. Confidence is relatively low across parties, regions, and demographic groups.
Nearly two in three adults (66%) and likely voters (65%) oppose Governor Newsom’s executive order banning the sale of all new gasoline-powered vehicles by 2035. This share of adults has increased 17 points since July 2021, when 49 percent of Californians opposed the executive order. Today, most Republicans (91%) and independents (69%) are opposed, while Democrats are split. About six in ten or more across regions and demographic groups oppose this executive order. READ MORE
Excerpt from New York Post/Yahoo! News:
Gov. Gavin Newsom recently doubled down on his mission to make California a haven where only new electric vehicles are sold, but most Californians — including fellow Democrats — are saying hell no, according to a new survey by the Public Policy Institute of California.
The survey, conducted June 29 to July 6, revealed that nearly 66% of adults and likely voters oppose Newsom's executive order signed in 2020 that bans the sale of new gasoline-powered vehicles by 2035.
The governor created such a ban as part of a mission to reduce the state's greenhouse gas emissions.
...
But since the order was issued, Californians have trended in the opposite direction. Compared to 2021, the share of Californians across all political stripes — even Democrats who tend to support climate-friendly policies — who say they oppose Newsom's ban has increased.
...
Mark Baldassare, the institute's survey director, told the Post the trend's underlying cause is the increasing unaffordability of the state.
He pointed to the declining share of people who when surveyed said they're seriously considering buying an electric vehicle — now about a third compared to a half five years ago.
"If they're not going to do it, and it's something they're going to be asked to be doing over the next few years, then I think that's why people are at odds with the governor's executive order," he said.
Part of the reason EVs have lost appeal is because federal tax credits which boosted financial incentives have expired, Baldassare said. But just as important is the fact that electricity prices in California have spiked.
"We've got 6 in 10 people who are saying that they feel that utility prices in their part of California are a major problem," he told The Post. "That number has gone up, and the reality is that if you have an electric vehicle, the electricity is not free."
...
Those higher utility rates are also partly driven by the same green agenda from California Democrats who want the state grid to go carbon-free by 2045, which requires infrastructure upgrades and more costs passed onto ratepayers.
Wayne Winegarden, an economics fellow at free-market think tank Pacific Research Institute, said the survey revealed a fundamental sentiment about affordability.
...
The declining EV appeal is in spite of the fact that California is facing sky-high gas prices. But at least gas pricing seems more transparent to consumers than how utilities price their bills, said Baldassare.
The fact that Californians of all political affiliations oppose the ban should send a message to policymakers — at least for now — to make adjustments or even course-correct on the issue, he added.
...
Still, Newsom has not given up on the electric vehicle mandate. He touted recently new legislation he signed that would create a $270 million rebate. The initiative will provide California residents with a $3,500 rebate on qualifying new electric vehicles with a manufacturer's suggested retail price of $50,000 or less.
The legislation also includes a $1,750 rebate for qualifying used electric vehicles priced at $25,000 or below. It's an attempt to replace the expiring federal incentives under Republican President Donald Trump.
"California is filling the void left by Trump and the GOP repealing the federal electric vehicle tax credit," Newsom wrote on X. "We won't forfeit the future to China."
According to the California Energy Commission, there are over 1.25 million electric vehicles registered in the Golden State, with EVs representing about one in five new vehicle sales in the state last year. READ MORE; includes VIDEO
Nearly 60,000 articles in our online library!
Use the categories and tags listed below to access the nearly 60,000 articles indexed on this website.
Advanced Biofuels USA Policy Statements and Handouts!
- For Kids: Carbon Cycle Puzzle Page
- Why Ethanol? Why E85?
- Just A Minute 3-5 Minute Educational Videos
- 30/30 Online Presentations
- “Disappearing” Carbon Tax for Non-Renewable Fuels
- What’s the Difference between Biodiesel and Renewable (Green) Diesel? 2020 revision
- How to De-Fossilize Your Fleet: Suggestions for Fleet Managers Working on Sustainability Programs
- New Engine Technologies Could Produce Similar Mileage for All Ethanol Fuel Mixtures
- Action Plan for a Sustainable Advanced Biofuel Economy
- The Interaction of the Clean Air Act, California’s CAA Waiver, Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards, Renewable Fuel Standards and California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard
- Latest Data on Fuel Mileage and GHG Benefits of E30
- What Can I Do?
Donate
DonateARCHIVES
- August 2026
- July 2026
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- June 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- October 2006
- April 2006
- January 2006
- April 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- December 1987
CATEGORIES
- About Us
- Advanced Biofuels Call to Action
- Aviation Fuel/Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF)
- BioChemicals/Renewable Chemicals
- BioRefineries/Renewable Fuel Production
- Business News/Analysis
- Cooking Fuel
- Education
- 30/30 Online Presentations
- Competitions, Contests
- Earth Day 2021
- Earth Day 2022
- Earth Day 2023
- Earth Day 2024
- Earth Day 2025
- Earth Day 2026
- Executive Training
- Featured Study Programs
- Instagram TikTok Short Videos
- Internships
- Just a Minute
- K-12 Activities
- Mechanics training
- Online Courses
- Podcasts
- Scholarships/Fellowships
- Teacher Resources
- Technical Training
- Technician Training
- University/College Programs
- Events
- Coming Events
- Completed Events
- More Coming Events
- Requests for Speakers, Presentations, Posters
- Requests for Speakers, Presentations, Posters Completed
- Webinars/Online
- Webinars/Online Completed; often available on-demand
- Federal Agency/Executive Branch
- Agency for International Development (USAID)
- Agriculture (USDA)
- Commerce Department
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission
- Congressional Budget Office
- Defense (DOD)
- Air Force
- Army
- DARPA (Defense Advance Research Projects Agency)
- Defense Logistics Agency
- Marines
- Navy
- Education Department
- Energy (DOE)
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
- Federal Reserve System
- Federal Trade Commission
- Food and Drug Administration
- General Services Administration
- Government Accountability Office (GAO)
- Health and Human Services (HHS)
- Homeland Security
- Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
- Interior Department
- International Trade Commission
- Joint Office of Energy and Transportation
- Justice (DOJ)
- Labor Department
- National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- National Research Council
- National Science Foundation
- National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Overseas Private Investment Corporation
- Patent and Trademark Office
- Securities and Exchange Commission
- State Department
- Surface Transportation Board
- Transportation (DOT)
- Federal Aviation Administration
- Federal Transit Administration
- Maritime Administration (MARAD)
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
- Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Admin (PHMSA)
- Treasury Department
- U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)
- White House
- Federal Legislation
- Federal Litigation
- Federal Regulation
- Feedstocks
- Agriculture/Food Processing Residues nonfield crop
- Alcohol/Ethanol/Isobutanol
- Algae/Other Aquatic Organisms/Seaweed
- Atmosphere
- Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
- Field/Orchard/Plantation Crops/Residues
- Forestry/Wood/Residues/Waste
- hydrogen
- Manure
- Methane/Biogas
- methanol/bio-/renewable methanol
- Not Agriculture
- RFNBO (Renewable Fuels of Non-Biological Origin)
- Seawater
- Sugars
- water
- Funding/Financing/Investing
- grants
- Green Jobs
- Green Racing
- Health Concerns/Benefits
- Heating Oil/Fuel
- History of Advanced Biofuels
- Infrastructure
- Aggregation
- Biofuels Engine Design
- Biorefinery/Fuel Production Infrastructure
- Carbon Capture/Storage/Use
- certification
- Deliver Dispense
- Farming/Growing
- Precursors/Biointermediates
- Preprocessing
- Pretreatment
- Terminals Transport Pipelines
- International
- Abu Dhabi
- Afghanistan
- Africa
- Albania
- Algeria
- Angola
- Antarctica
- Arctic
- Argentina
- Armenia
- Aruba
- Asia
- Asia Pacific
- Australia
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
- Bahamas
- Bahrain
- Bangladesh
- Barbados
- Belarus
- Belgium
- Belize
- Benin
- Bermuda
- Bhutan
- Bolivia
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Botswana
- Brazil
- Brunei
- Bulgaria
- Burkina Faso
- Burundi
- Cambodia
- Cameroon
- Canada
- Canary Islands
- Caribbean
- Central African Republic
- Central America
- Chad
- Chile
- China
- Colombia
- Congo
- Congo, Democratic Republic of
- Costa Rica
- Croatia
- Cuba
- Cyprus
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Dominican Republic
- Dubai
- Ecuador
- Egypt
- El Salvador
- Equatorial Guinea
- Estonia
- Eswatini/Swaziland
- Ethiopia
- European Union (EU)
- Fiji
- Finland
- France
- French Guiana
- Gabon
- Georgia
- Germany
- Ghana
- Global South
- Greece
- Greenland
- Grenada
- Guatemala
- Guinea
- Guyana
- Haiti
- Honduras
- Hong Kong
- Hungary
- Iceland
- India
- Indonesia
- Iran
- Iraq
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Ivory Coast
- Jamaica
- Japan
- Jersey
- Jordan
- Kazakhstan
- Kenya
- Korea
- Kosovo
- Kuwait
- Laos
- Latin America
- Latvia
- Lebanon
- Liberia
- Libya
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Macedonia
- Madagascar
- Malawi
- Malaysia
- Maldives
- Mali
- Malta
- Marshall Islands
- Mauritania
- Mauritius
- Mexico
- Middle East
- Moldova
- Monaco
- Mongolia
- Morocco
- Mozambique
- Myanmar/Burma
- Namibia
- Nepal
- Netherlands
- New Guinea
- New Zealand
- Nicaragua
- Niger
- Nigeria
- North Africa
- North America
- North Korea
- Northern Ireland
- Norway
- Oman
- Pakistan
- Panama
- Papua New Guinea
- Paraguay
- Peru
- Philippines
- Poland
- Portugal
- Qatar
- Republic of
- Romania
- Russia
- Rwanda
- Saudi Arabia
- Scotland
- Senegal
- Serbia
- Sierra Leone
- Singapore
- Slovakia/Slovak Republic
- Slovenia
- Solomon Islands
- South Africa
- South America
- South Korea (Republic of Korea)
- South Sudan
- Southeast Asia
- Spain
- Sri Lanka
- Sudan
- Suriname
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Taiwan
- Tanzania
- Thailand
- Timor-Leste
- Togo
- Trinidad and Tobago
- Tunisia
- Turkey
- Tuvalu
- Uganda
- UK (United Kingdom)
- Ukraine
- United Arab Emirates UAE
- Uruguay
- Uzbekistan
- Vatican
- Venezuela
- Vietnam
- Wales
- Zambia
- Zanzibar
- Zimbabwe
- Marine/Boat Bio and Renewable Fuel/MGO/MDO/SMF
- Marketing/Market Forces and Sales
- Opinions
- Organizations
- Original Writing, Opinions Advanced Biofuels USA
- Policy
- Presentations
- Biofuels Digest Conferences
- DOE Conferences
- Bioeconomy 2017
- Bioenergy2015
- Biomass2008
- Biomass2009
- Biomass2010
- Biomass2011
- Biomass2012
- Biomass2013
- Biomass2014
- DOE Project Peer Review
- Other Conferences/Events
- R & D Focus
- Carbon Capture/Storage/Use
- Co-Products
- Feedstock
- Logistics
- Performance
- Process
- Vehicle/Engine/Motor/Aircraft/Boiler/Ship
- Yeast
- Railroad/Train/Locomotive Fuel
- Resources
- Books Web Sites etc
- Business
- Definition of Advanced Biofuels
- Find Stuff
- Government Resources
- Scientific Resources
- Technical Resources
- Tools/Decision-Making
- Rocket/Missile Fuel
- Sponsors
- States/Territories
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Guam
- Hawai'i
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Midwest
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Native American tribal nation lands
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Puerto Rico
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- Washington DC
- West Coast
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- Sustainability
- Uncategorized
- What You Can Do
tags
© 2008-2023 Copyright Advanced BioFuels USA. All Rights reserved.
Comments are closed.