Advanced Biofuels USA: promoting the understanding, development and use of advanced biofuels around the world.

Call to Action for a Truly Sustainable Renewable Future
August 8, 2013 – 5:07 pm | No Comment

-Include high octane/high ethanol Regular Grade fuel in EPA Tier 3 regulations.
-Use a dedicated, self-reducing non-renewable carbon user fee to fund renewable energy R&D.
-Start an Apollo-type program to bring New Ideas to sustainable biofuel and …

Read the full story »
Business News/Analysis

Federal Legislation

Political news and views from Capitol Hill.

More Coming Events

Conferences and Events List in Addition to Coming Events Carousel (above)

Original Writing, Opinions Advanced Biofuels USA

Sustainability

Home » European Union (EU), Feedstocks, Field/Orchard Crops, Funding/Financing/Investing, Opinions, Policy, Sustainability

Parliament Debate Debunks Misconceptions on #Biodiesel Carbon Savings and Benefits

Submitted by on October 6, 2017 – 3:42 pmNo Comment

(EU Reporter)  Ahead of key votes on the post-2020 EU Renewable Energy Directive (RED II) in the ITRE, ENVI and TRAN Committees of the European Parliament (EP), EU Biodiesel Chain held a debate in Strasbourg aimed at countering misperceptions on biofuels with latest scientific findings on the positive role of biodiesel production in decarbonizing transport and in agricultural sustainability.

Opening the event, the RED II AGRI Rapporteur MEP Marijana Petir described the hard work done within the Agricultural Committee in achieving a compromise on the role of conventional biofuels, saying that “the recent vote in the AGRI Committee is a powerful signal to steer discussions within the ENVI Committee, in a way that recognizes the important role of sustainable biofuels for rural development and GHG emissions reduction in the EU.”

The Shadow Rapporteur in the ITRE Committee MEP Seán Kelly said: “It is vital that we ensure regulatory certainty as many of those who currently produce 1st generation biofuels are the same ones that we are counting on to invest in the development of advanced biofuels. As a result, reducing the share of conventional biofuels would send the wrong signal to investors and be detrimental to the development of advanced biofuels.”

Delivering a keynote speech on the differences between two models assessing induced biofuels’ GHG emissions from land use change – GLOBIOM, used in debates on RED II, and GTAP-BIO, used by the US California Air Resources Board – Professor Wally Tyner from Purdue University (USA), stated: “In my experience, it is better to have an open model due to a broad stakeholder input. While GTAP is peer-reviewed, transparent and subject to stakeholder examination, GLOBIOM is not open for scrutiny”. In investigating the important differences between these two models, Professor Tyner determined the causes for many of these differences, and concluded that “with improved assumptions, GLOBIOM ILUC figures for oilseed crops would substantially decrease.”  READ MORE

Burning Wood Criticized as EU Considers Clean-Energy Law ((Bloomberg) 

Related Post

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments are closed.