Waste-to-Fuels: Innovation, Cost Parity Offset by Public Anxiety
A Biofuels Digest Special Report on the 2nd Annual Waste-to-Fuels Conference and Trade Show: While policy momentum behind biofuels has sputtered in recent months due in part to a slumping economy, indirect land use change debates, and lifecycle studies concluding that “green” fuels cause more greenhouse gas emissions than conventional fuels, using waste as a fuel feedstock represents a promising shortcut on the path to energy security. READ MORE
Related posts:
- IEA Report Confirms Growing Green House Gas Reduction from Ethanol Use Warns Against Ignoring Future Innovation in Policymaking
- EPA Holds Greenhouse Gas Analysis Workshop June 10-11, Washington, DC
- Growth Energy Policy Brief: California’s Dangerous Gamble with Indirect Land Use Change
- Study Finds That Without a Price on Carbon, Regular Hybrids can Lower Lifecycle CO2 Emissions As Effectively as Plug-in Hybrids, and At Lower Cost
- Life Cycle Analysis of Camelina-based Renewable Jet and Diesel Fuels Shows 84-89% GHG Savings Compared to Petroleum Fuels


