<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Advanced BioFuels USA &#187; Federal Legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/category/federal-legislation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info</link>
	<description>Truly Sustainable Renewable Future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 23:41:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>National Farmers Union Leads Broad Coalition to Urge Senate to Bring Farm Bill to Floor Vote; Includes Advanced Biofuels USA</title>
		<link>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/national-farmers-union-leads-broad-coalition-to-urge-senate-to-bring-farm-bill-to-floor-vote-includes-advanced-biofuels-usa</link>
		<comments>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/national-farmers-union-leads-broad-coalition-to-urge-senate-to-bring-farm-bill-to-floor-vote-includes-advanced-biofuels-usa#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 21:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Original Writing, Opinions Advanced Biofuels USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farm Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USDA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/?p=32505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(National Farmers Union)  National Farmers Union (NFU) and a coalition of agricultural, conservation, environmental, energy, forestry, hunger, and rural stakeholders sent a letter to Senate leadership today urging them to bring the Agriculture Reform, Food and ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(National Farmers Union)  National Farmers Union (NFU) and a coalition of agricultural, conservation, environmental, energy, forestry, hunger, and rural stakeholders sent a letter to Senate leadership today urging them to bring the <em>Agriculture Reform, Food and Jobs Act of 2012</em> to the Senate floor as soon as possible. NFU led the effort, which was supported by more than 125 organizations.</p>
<p>“This is one piece of legislation upon which all Americans depend, urban as well as rural,” stated the letter. “With limited time remaining before the expiration of current program authorities, time is of the essence.”</p>
<p>The <em>Agriculture Reform, Food and Jobs Act of 2012 </em>passed the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry on April 26 by a 16-5 vote. The broad range of the 125 cosigners emphasizes the expansive reach and impact of the farm bill.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;" align="center">“This strongly bipartisan bill ensures that agriculture does its part to reduce the deficit, cutting spending by $23 billion, while still maintaining a safety net that family farmers and ranchers need,” said NFU President Roger Johnson. “Some farm bill programs have already expired, and the rest expire on Sept. 30. It is critical to pass a farm bill as soon as possible so that Americans have the agriculture, conservation, environmental, forestry, hunger, and rural development programs that they need. While many of us will continue to work for improvements in the bill, we all agree that we need a farm bill this year.”   <a href="http://nfu.org/news/200-family-farm-policy/1040-nfu-leads-broad-coalition-to-urge-senate-to-bring-farm-bill-to-floor-vote">READ MORE</a>   Read <a href="http://nfu.org/images/05%2007%2012%20Farm%20Bill%20Coalition%20Senate%20Leadership%20FINAL.pdf">LETTER</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/national-farmers-union-leads-broad-coalition-to-urge-senate-to-bring-farm-bill-to-floor-vote-includes-advanced-biofuels-usa/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Refiners Worry Lack of E15 Stations Will Cause RFS Non-Compliance</title>
		<link>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/refiners-worry-lack-of-e15-stations-will-cause-rfs-non-compliance</link>
		<comments>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/refiners-worry-lack-of-e15-stations-will-cause-rfs-non-compliance#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 21:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business News/Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deliver Dispense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing and Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E15 pumps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFS2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USDA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/?p=32503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Kris Bevill (Ethanol Producer Magazine)  &#8230;API has legally challenged every step of the U.S. EPA’s approval of E15, claiming that more scientific research should be completed before it is allowed to be used in ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by Kris Bevill (Ethanol Producer Magazine)  &#8230;API has legally challenged every step of the U.S. EPA’s approval of E15, claiming that more scientific research should be completed before it is allowed to be used in anything other than flex-fuel infrastructure and vehicles. But the group also admits that without widespread use of ethanol blends greater than E10, refiners may be unable to meet increasing renewable fuel standard (RFS) volume requirements, which will subject them to fines of up to $37,500 per day per violation. Therefore, API supports proposed legislation that would relieve regulatory requirements for retailers seeking to offer E15 using existing infrastructure.</p>
<p>&#8230;Because there is no mandate requiring the sale of E15, it remains to be determined how quickly retailers across the nation will move to sell E15 once infrastructure compatibility issues are resolved. However, in some Midwest states, retail stations that have installed blender pumps are expected to begin offering E15 to customers driving 2001 and newer vehicles any day. Blender pumps are approved for use with any ethanol blend up to E85 and so are not constrained by the same compatibility issues facing owners of conventional retail dispensers.  <a href="http://ethanolproducer.com/articles/8762/refiners-worry-lack-of-e15-stations-will-cause-rfs-non-compliance">READ MORE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/refiners-worry-lack-of-e15-stations-will-cause-rfs-non-compliance/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biodiesel Wants Its Tax Break Back</title>
		<link>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/biodiesel-wants-its-tax-break-back</link>
		<comments>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/biodiesel-wants-its-tax-break-back#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 16:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BioRefineries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business News/Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biofuel tax credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation Fuels Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/?p=32402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Dan Piller  (Des Moines Register)  The National Biodiesel Board (NBB) Thursday asked Congress to reinstate the $1 per gallon biodiesel tax incentive “to avoid further disruption to an emerging American industry that is creating ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by Dan Piller  (Des Moines Register)  The National Biodiesel Board (NBB) Thursday asked Congress to reinstate the $1 per gallon biodiesel tax incentive “to avoid further disruption to an emerging American industry that is creating jobs across the country while diversifying U.S. energy supplies.”</p>
<p>In written testimony submitted to the House Ways and Means Committee&#8217;s Subcommittee on Select Revenue Measures for a hearing on expiring tax provisions, NBB Vice President Anne Steckel emphasized that the biodiesel industry achieved record production of nearly 1.1 billion gallons last year before the $1-per-gallon tax incentive expired on Dec. 31. She urged lawmakers to pass an extension as quickly as possible to prevent a drop in production and potential layoffs.  <a href="http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20120426/NEWS/120426028/Biodiesel-Wants-its-Tax-Break-Back">READ MORE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/biodiesel-wants-its-tax-break-back/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RFA Answers Anti-Ethanol Speculation from Joint Economic Committee Hearing</title>
		<link>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/rfa-answers-anti-ethanol-speculation-from-joint-economic-committee-hearing</link>
		<comments>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/rfa-answers-anti-ethanol-speculation-from-joint-economic-committee-hearing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 16:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business News/Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethanol prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil refineries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refineries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Fuel Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFS2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation Fuels Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Ethanol Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/?p=32397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Renewable Fuels Association/BioFuelsChat.com)  &#8230;Specifically, (Renewable Fuels Association President and CEO Bob) Dinneen noted two driving factors that have led to refinery shutterings on the East Coast:
First, most East Coast refineries cannot process the lower-cost types of ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Renewable Fuels Association/BioFuelsChat.com)  &#8230;Specifically, (Renewable Fuels Association President and CEO Bob) Dinneen noted two driving factors that have led to refinery shutterings on the East Coast:</p>
<p>First, most East Coast refineries cannot process the lower-cost types of crude oil that are increasing in supply in North America. As a result, oil acquisition costs for East Coast refineries are substantially higher than for refineries in other regions.</p>
<p>Second, due to record high crude oil prices in recent years, demand for gasoline and other finished refinery products has fallen precipitously. Consumers have responded to record high oil and gasoline prices by driving less and purchasing more fuel efficient vehicles. Lower demand for refined products has led to significant refinery overcapacity in the East Coast region.</p>
<p>As reported recently by CNN Money, refineries in the Northeast “…are losing money because they are old and cannot process the cheaper, heavier types of oil that are increasingly in supply from Canada’s oil sands, Saudi Arabia, Venezuela and elsewhere.”</p>
<p>Dinneen also pointed to the fact the companies closing the refineries did not mention ethanol or the RFS. “It is telling that the owners of the shuttered refineries themselves—Sunoco and ConocoPhillips—didn’t mention ethanol or the RFS as precipitating causes of their economic difficulties when they announced the closures,” wrote Dinneen.</p>
<p>&#8230;  “Despite Mr. O’Malley’s false assertion that ethanol is ‘more expensive than the product coming from refineries,’ data from the Chicago Mercantile Exchange clearly show that ethanol is selling for $1 per gallon less than gasoline at the wholesale level today.” <a href="http://biofuelschat.com/topics/rfa-answers-anti-ethanol-speculation-joint-economic-committee-hearing?utm_campaign=Biofuels&amp;utm_medium=twitter&amp;utm_source=twitter"> READ MORE</a> and <a href="http://www.ethanolrfa.org/exchange/entry/answering-crocodile-tears/">MORE</a> (Renewable Fuels Association) and <a href="http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx?id=/article-xml/avd_05_03_2012_p05-01-453982.xml&amp;p=1">MORE</a> (Aviation Week on Delta&#8217;s purchase of PA refiinery)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/rfa-answers-anti-ethanol-speculation-from-joint-economic-committee-hearing/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E15 Gas Brings Conflict to Pumps</title>
		<link>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/e15-gas-brings-conflict-to-pumps</link>
		<comments>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/e15-gas-brings-conflict-to-pumps#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biofuels Engine Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business News/Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deliver Dispense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing and Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E15 pumps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engine Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Ethanol Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/?p=32341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by David Shaffer (Star Tribune)  A new blend of ethanol and gasoline may soon show up at the gas station pumps &#8212; along with mixed messages on whether it&#8217;s safe to put it in your ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by David Shaffer (Star Tribune)  A new blend of ethanol and gasoline may soon show up at the gas station pumps &#8212; along with mixed messages on whether it&#8217;s safe to put it in your vehicle.</p>
<p>Motorists driving up to pumps for the new, higher-ethanol &#8220;E15&#8243; will see government-mandated orange-and-black signs that say the new fuel blend is approved for use in all 2001 and newer cars and light trucks.</p>
<p>Two of the biggest carmakers offer puzzling or contrary messages, right on their gasoline caps. Toyota warns on its 2012 model gas caps not to use E15. Ford offers less-explicit advice.</p>
<p>&#8230;Most automakers, including General Motors and Chrysler, have not placed explicit E15 warnings on their gas caps. Still, the auto industry is part of a broad legal challenge to stop E15.</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8221;Our vehicles aren&#8217;t backward compatible with E15, and we didn&#8217;t know when it was going to hit the market,&#8221; said Toyota spokeswoman Cindy Knight. &#8220;We don&#8217;t want customers to damage their vehicles. It would not be covered under warranty.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ford&#8217;s ethanol message on its gas portal &#8212; its vehicles don&#8217;t have caps &#8212; dates to 2006. The idea was to warn motorists not to fill up with high-ethanol blends of E20 to E85 at pumps meant for flexible-fuel vehicles, said Cynthia Williams, Ford&#8217;s environmental policy manger.</p>
<p>&#8230;Earlier this month, a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., heard arguments by the oil industry, carmakers and others that have challenged the EPA&#8217;s E15 decision. If the court rules against the EPA, it could derail the introduction of E15.   <a href="http://www.startribune.com/local/149444025.html?page=all&amp;prepage=2&amp;c=y#continue">READ MORE</a> and <a href="http://www.greeleytribune.com/article/20120421/BUSINESS/704219950">MORE</a> (Greeley Tribune) and <a href="http://www.columbiamissourian.com/stories/2012/04/27/federal-agency-approves-e15-opponents-concerned/">MORE</a> (Missourian)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/e15-gas-brings-conflict-to-pumps/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Ag Committee OK’s $800M for Farm Bill Energy Programs; DOE OK’d to Move $100M for Advanced Biofuels</title>
		<link>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/senate-ag-committee-oks-800m-for-farm-bill-energy-programs-doe-okd-to-move-100m-for-advanced-biofuels</link>
		<comments>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/senate-ag-committee-oks-800m-for-farm-bill-energy-programs-doe-okd-to-move-100m-for-advanced-biofuels#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business News/Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funding/Financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agricultural Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farm Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation Fuels Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USDA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/?p=32300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Jim Lane (Biofuels Digest)  In Washington, the Senate Agriculture Committee has approved $800 million in mandatory biofuels-related funding for the proposed energy title in the upcoming Farm Bill.
&#8230;Yesterday, Senators Kent Conrad of North Dakota ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by Jim Lane (Biofuels Digest)  In Washington, the Senate Agriculture Committee has approved $800 million in mandatory biofuels-related funding for the proposed energy title in the upcoming Farm Bill.</p>
<p>&#8230;Yesterday, Senators Kent Conrad of North Dakota and Richard Lugar of Indiana led the way in carrying an amendment that put the mandatory funding into the bill. According the Advanced Biofuels Association president Michael McAdams, they were part of a broad, bipartisan coalition that has come together to support biofuels and the Farm Bill, including Republican Senators Grassley of Iowa, Thune of South Dakota, Cochran of Mississippi and Hoeven of North Dakota, and Democratic Senators Harkin of Iowa, Klobuchar of Minnesota, Casey of Pennsylvania, Brown of Ohio, Bennet of Colorado, and Stabenow of Michigan.</p>
<p>&#8230;In other Capitol Hill news, the Department of Energy is now receiving Senate approval to move $100 million in previously authorized funding to support its advanced biofuels partnership with the US Navy, and the US Department of Agriculture, which pledged $510 million last year under the Defense Production Act to invest directly in commercial-scale biofuels facilities to assure a supply of military biofuels at affordable prices.</p>
<p>&#8230;There is still considerable doubt as to whether a Farm Bill will proceed forward, during the 2012 election season. Reportedly, Senate Agriculture chair Debbie Stabenow is working with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to schedule time for the Farm Bill before the July 4th recess.  <a href="http://www.biofuelsdigest.com/bdigest/2012/04/27/senate-ag-committee-oks-835m-for-farm-bill-energy-programs-doe-okd-to-move-100m-for-advanced-biofuels/">READ MORE</a> and <a href="http://www.governorsbiofuelscoalition.org/?p=2443">MORE</a> (Governors&#8217; Biofuels Coalition) and <a href="http://lugar.enews.senate.gov/mail/util.cfm?gpiv=2100087654.53901.75&amp;gen=1">MORE</a> (Senator Richard Lugar)    <a href="http://lugar.senate.gov/energy/legislation/ConradLugarEnergyAmendment.pdf">Download Lugar/Conrad amendment</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/senate-ag-committee-oks-800m-for-farm-bill-energy-programs-doe-okd-to-move-100m-for-advanced-biofuels/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s Biofuel Industry Moves From The Beaker To Barrel, ABFA President Testifies To Congress</title>
		<link>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/americas-biofuel-industry-moves-from-the-beaker-to-barrel-abfa-president-testifies-to-congress</link>
		<comments>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/americas-biofuel-industry-moves-from-the-beaker-to-barrel-abfa-president-testifies-to-congress#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation Fuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BioRefineries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business News/Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aviation biofuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable diesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFS2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation Fuels Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Energy Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/?p=32242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Advanced Biofuels Association)  Testifying today before the U.S. House Small Business Committee&#8217;s Subcommittee on Agriculture, Energy and Trade, Michael McAdams, president, Advanced Biofuels Association – ABFA, said he is, &#8220;proud to report to this Committee and ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Advanced Biofuels Association)  Testifying today before the U.S. House Small Business Committee&#8217;s Subcommittee on Agriculture, Energy and Trade, Michael McAdams, president, Advanced Biofuels Association – ABFA, said he is, &#8220;proud to report to this Committee and to this Congress that America&#8217;s domestic advanced biofuels industry has moved from the beaker to the barrel, all in record time. And like most parts of our nation&#8217;s economy, small business and American ingenuity are proving to be the engine driving our success.&#8221;</p>
<p>McAdams began his testimony, &#8220;Let me start today by sharing some of the biggest success stories which have occurred over the last year. The Air Force has flown the F-16/Thunderbirds on a mixture of advanced biofuels, the navy has tested advanced biofuels in ships and vehicles, and the commercial sector has flown the first cross country flight on a blend of renewable jet fuel.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;We have one member, Dynamic Fuels, producing a million gallons of renewable jet and renewable diesel a week, and have five members who have gone public. In addition, two Colorado member companies are preparing to deploy their innovative technologies in the near term.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Gevo, which will produce an isobutanol, a drop in, fungible fuel, will commission its 18 million gallon plant in June of this year in Luverne, Minnesota. While Sundrop Fuels is on target to break ground to build a 50 million gallon cellulosic gasoline plant in Louisiana this year.&#8221;</p>
<p>McAdams also noted, &#8220;the single most important policy component is the Renewable Fuels Standard, passed overwhelmingly in 2007 by a bipartisan Congress and signed into law by President Bush. Although it is not perfect, it is fundamentally important that the Congress continue to send a strong bipartisan signal of support for this policy if we wish to continue the remarkable progress and grow an advanced biofuels industry.&#8221;</p>
<p>He concluded his testimony, &#8220;We believe we can and should be a fundamental part of an American energy policy that adopts a portfolio approach. As I have shared with you this morning, we are already starting to see advanced biofuels delivering on its promise of creating new jobs, and helping to strengthen our nation&#8217;s economic and energy security.&#8221;  <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/26/idUS241501+26-Apr-2012+PRN20120426">READ MORE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/americas-biofuel-industry-moves-from-the-beaker-to-barrel-abfa-president-testifies-to-congress/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Groups Call On U.S. Senate to Authorize Funding for Military Biofuel</title>
		<link>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/groups-call-on-u-s-senate-to-authorize-funding-for-military-biofuel</link>
		<comments>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/groups-call-on-u-s-senate-to-authorize-funding-for-military-biofuel#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation Fuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BioChemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business News/Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aviation biofuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Production Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military use of biofuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Energy Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/?p=32233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Advanced Biofuels Association)  Energy security is a vital part of national security; we can improve energy security with advanced biofuel production in the U.S. The Biotechnology Industry Organization, the Advanced BioFuel Association, the Algal Biomass Organization, ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Advanced Biofuels Association)  Energy security is a vital part of national security; we can improve energy security with advanced biofuel production in the U.S. The Biotechnology Industry Organization, the Advanced BioFuel Association, the Algal Biomass Organization, Airlines for America, and the National Farm Bureau Federation today wrote leaders of the Senate Appropriations Committee asking them to include authorization for the U.S. Department of Energy to transfer funds to the Defense Production Act necessary for an interagency project to ramp up production of military aviation and diesel fuels.</p>
<p>The letter follows:</p>
<p>The Honorable Daniel K. Inouye</p>
<p>Chairman</p>
<p>Senate Committee on Appropriations</p>
<p>U.S. Senate</p>
<p>Washington, DC 20510</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The Honorable Thad Cochran</p>
<p>Ranking Member</p>
<p>Senate Committee on Appropriations</p>
<p>U.S. Senate</p>
<p>Washington, DC 20510</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Dear Chairman Inouye and Ranking Member Cochran:</p>
<p>In advance of the scheduled mark up of the Fiscal Year 2013 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act on Thursday, the members of the Advanced Biofuels Association (ABFA), Algal Biomass Organization (ABO), Airlines for America (A4A), the American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF), and the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) urge you to support the inclusion of language to allow for the transfer of funds from the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) accounts to the Defense Production Act (DPA) fund. This transfer that would further DOE’s mission is a top priority for our industries because it would serve as a catalyst to the development of a commercial supply of alternative fuels and reduce our nation’s dependence on foreign oil and a volatile global oil market.</p>
<p>The language, requested by DOE, would support an interagency initiative to ramp up commercial production of domestic renewable fuels for commercial and military use in ground, maritime and aviation systems. Advanced, drop-in biofuels offer a viable alternative to conventional petroleum-based fuels for defense applications and have been demonstrated in myriad weapon systems. The U.S. Air Force has already completed certifying its entire aircraft fleet to operate on a blend of 50 percent synthetic jet fuel and is moving to certify other alternatives. The U.S. Navy is in the process of approving hydrotreated renewable jet fuels, synthetics and other alternatives.</p>
<p>As these certifications have shown, advanced biofuels and other alternatives can replace military fuels derived from crude oil without disruptions or changes to existing equipment or infrastructure while reducing dependence upon oil imports. DOE’s ability to direct funds to this initiative will further its mission to “ensure America’s security and prosperity by addressing its energy, environmental and nuclear challenges through transformative science and technology solutions.” It will also build on past DPA successes that have resulted in domestic production capacity for valued defense materials, such as silicon carbide ceramics (used in nuclear reactors), indium phosphide and gallium arsenide (used in lasers and semiconductors), as well as aluminum and titanium, which are ubiquitous in nearly all major weapons systems.</p>
<p>Thank you for your consideration of this request. Please feel free to contact us with any questions and please know that the members of our organizations stand ready to do their part to increase our nation’s energy independence and security.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Michael J. McAdams</p>
<p>President</p>
<p>Advanced Biofuels Association</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Sharon L. Pinkerton</p>
<p>Senior Vice President Legislative and Regulatory Policy</p>
<p>Airlines for America</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Mary Rosenthal Executive</p>
<p>Director</p>
<p>Algal Biomass Organization</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Bob Stallman</p>
<p>President</p>
<p>American Farm Bureau Federation</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>James C. Greenwood</p>
<p>President and CEO</p>
<p>Biotechnology Industry Organization   <a href="http://www.advancedbiofuelsassociation.com/news.php?id=185">READ MORE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/groups-call-on-u-s-senate-to-authorize-funding-for-military-biofuel/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Energy Coalition Disappointed in Farm Bill Draft</title>
		<link>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/energy-coalition-disappointed-in-farm-bill-draft</link>
		<comments>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/energy-coalition-disappointed-in-farm-bill-draft#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agricultural Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biomass Crop Assistance Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farm Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Energy Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/?p=32192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Cindy Zimmerman (DomesticFuel.com)  A coalition of trade groups and organizations representing renewable energy, energy efficiency, farm and environmental interests is disappointed in a 2012 Farm Bill draft out of the Senate Agriculture Committee that ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by Cindy Zimmerman (DomesticFuel.com)  A coalition of trade groups and organizations representing renewable energy, energy efficiency, farm and environmental interests is disappointed in a 2012 Farm Bill draft out of the Senate Agriculture Committee that they say provides “no real funding for energy programs.”</p>
<p>&#8230; “These programs have unlocked private capital for construction of biorefineries, put more than 150,000 acres of underutilized farmland into production of next-generation energy crops, and ignited an explosion of biomanufacturing innovation, demonstration and early commercialization,” said (Brent) Erickson (of the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO)). “In the short time that these programs have operated, they’ve achieved a high rate of return in supporting the start up of renewable chemical, advanced biofuel and biomanufacturing companies, as a timeline of the programs demonstrates.”  <a href="http://domesticfuel.com/2012/04/23/energy-coalition-disappointed-in-farm-bill-draft/">READ MORE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/energy-coalition-disappointed-in-farm-bill-draft/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RFA’s Dinneen Tells House Committee to Support Domestic Fuels Protection Act</title>
		<link>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/rfas-dinneen-tells-house-committee-to-support-domestic-fuels-protection-act</link>
		<comments>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/rfas-dinneen-tells-house-committee-to-support-domestic-fuels-protection-act#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business News/Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deliver Dispense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing and Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFS2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation Fuels Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Energy Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Ethanol Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/?p=32098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Renewable Fuels Association)  Providing flexibility to fuel retailers will be key to the continued growth in availability of higher level ethanol blends like E15 and other renewable fuels, according to Renewable Fuels Association President and ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Renewable Fuels Association)  Providing flexibility to fuel retailers will be key to the continued growth in availability of higher level ethanol blends like E15 and other renewable fuels, according to Renewable Fuels Association President and CEO Bob Dinneen in <a href="http://ethanolrfa.org/page/-/objects/pdf/PublicPolicy/OfficialStatements/Dinneen%20E%26C%20Subcmte%20Testimony%204-19-12.pdf?nocdn=1">written testimony</a> before the House Energy and Commerce Committee Subcommittee on Environment and Economy.</p>
<p>Dinneen is testifying in support of the Domestic Fuels Protection Act, a bill designed to help ease the regulatory burden on fuel retailers seeking to offer consumers a wider range of fuel choices beyond petroleum-based fuels.</p>
<p>“[T]he current regulatory structure provides no pathway to certify existing equipment for anything other than fossil fuels, even when test data demonstrates its safety,” Dinneen testified. “The Domestic Fuels Protection Act allows EPA to create such a process, thereby providing new fuels access to the marketplace without having to expend time and resources on new infrastructure unnecessarily.”</p>
<p>The Domestic Fuels Protection Act rests on a simple premise: if a new fuel has been approved by EPA, if equipment used by retailers to store and dispense a new fuel meets specifications, and if retailers properly inform customers regarding the approved uses of a new fuel, then retailers, fuel producers, and other stakeholders should not have to be concerned about defending meritless lawsuits. The legislation is narrowly tailored to achieve this goal. It addresses only liability protection and does not alter the Renewable Fuel Standard or otherwise impact fuels that have been sanctioned by EPA as legal to offer for sale. Importantly, the legislation is not a prerequisite to the introduction into commerce of E15, which was approved by EPA after rigorous testing by the U.S. Department of Energy and others and which was recently registered as a legal fuel under the Clean Air Act.</p>
<p>Expanding market access for ethanol and other renewable fuels is critical to both expanding America’s renewable fuel industry and achieving the goals of the RFS. “I can say without hyperbole or reservation that the RFS has been the most successful energy policy this nation has ever implemented. It should be vigorously defended and maintained, and allowed to reach its full potential of 36 billion gallons of clean burning, renewable fuel,” said Dinneen.</p>
<p>Dinneen continued, “The RFS is entering a critical period, however. The volumes of renewable fuel refiners are required to meet can no longer be met by just 10% ethanol. Greater volumes of ethanol and a greater diversity of biofuels and feedstocks will be necessary to meet the increasing volumes required by the RFS. Critically, these fuels will be attempting to enter the marketplace amidst a complicated regulatory structure that favors incumbent technologies and discourages market access. Gasoline marketers deserve the certainty that they will not be penalized for utilizing a new fuel or fuel blend that has been approved for use by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).”</p>
<p>Earlier this week, the RFA released poll results showing that 61% of American adults support the RFS and 58% of Americans would use more domestically-produced renewable fuel when available.</p>
<p>The Domestic Fuels Protection Act was introduced in the House by Representatives John Shimkus (R-IL), Mike Ross (D-AR), John Sullivan (R-OK) and Collin Peterson (D-MN). A Senate counterpart, the Domestic Fuels Act, has also been introduced by Senators John Hoeven (R-ND), Roy Blunt (R-MO), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), and Mike Crapo (R-ID).</p>
<p>Dinneen’s full testimony is available <a href="http://ethanolrfa.org/page/-/objects/pdf/PublicPolicy/OfficialStatements/Dinneen%20E%26C%20Subcmte%20Testimony%204-19-12.pdf?nocdn=1">here</a>.  <a href="http://www.ethanolrfa.org/news/entry/rfas-dinneen-tells-house-committee-to-support-domestic-fuels-protection-act/">READ MORE</a> and <a href="http://domesticfuel.com/2012/04/21/dinneen-asks-for-support-of-biofuels-during-hearing/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+DomesticFuel+%28Domestic+Fuel%29">MORE</a> (DomesticFuel.com)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/rfas-dinneen-tells-house-committee-to-support-domestic-fuels-protection-act/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

